Posted by AlekTX2020 on 12/10/2023 2:02:00 PM (view original):
My philosophy going into that battle was most likely having to spend $100k on the DB and having $80k to land 2 more recruits after signing period, which would be cheaper to land players after the big East signs who they want and some quality leftovers would be available for me. I’ve never spent $180,000 on a player so didn’t think it could reach that high. When I reached $150,000 invested I thought about stopping and signing 2 players with $30,000 left. But at that point I made a decision to let Penn State bleed more, with the possibility that I win the recruit. If the recruit was somewhere else in West Virginia I would have let it go. But my motto has always been to be fierce, Morgantown player or die. I died. But with underlying “rule” that if you come anywhere near Morgantown prepare to sink a lot of $$ into that player. OSU and PSU will have to be more conservative bc everyone knows if they’re in a battle with WV, other big money teams will attack.
I don't coach at D1, don't fully know how recruiting functions there, and have no dog in this hunt.
That said i have a question for you Alek(or any other D1 coaches):
Shouldn't your primary goal in recruiting
always be getting the best possible classes possible to build your own program? Why are you so focused on making PSU bleed more, or making OSU/PSU more conservative? Those things seem like secondary considerations at best only after you have secured the best class possible to build your own program. It seems like you have your priorities backwards and have made decisions that sabotage your own program's well-being in order to send a "message" to other coaches.
From the outside, that does not seem like a winning tradeoff.
I may move to D1 at some point so I'm genuinely interested in the thoughts of D1 coaches on this: Why would it be ever worth sacrificing your own class and your own program's well-being to send a "message" (of dubious value?) to another coach?
12/10/2023 8:26 PM (edited)