TRUMP: Best President ever Topic

“One day you will get a first hand education on National Debt.”

“One day.” Next sentence:

“Your lifetime is replete with examples.”

One day you will get a first hand education in something your lifetime is replete with examples of. Ok.

ps: a Trump supporter complaining about the national debt, woooo boy
1/20/2021 4:26 PM
Posted by DougOut on 1/20/2021 3:06:00 PM (view original):
I'm not gonna quote post 'cause they get too long.

1. TRUE
2. Copy Trumps model
3. You are SO wrong. NO COMPROMISE.
4. We will see. Adding States is end of Republic. Ending Electoral College is end of Republic. You want simple majority in Senate....Pass Constitutional amendment.
5. Colleges are a business. Many would be better off in a trade school. Many courses are useless. BIG EDUCATION is LOADED FILTHY RICH!!! Tenure is stupid. BIG EDUCATION CAN STAY OUT OF MY BACK POCKET. NO TENURE. I GOT ALOT OF PROBLEMS WITH BIG ED. Also no reason not to allow creationism and intelligent design in public school as an elective.
“Adding states is the end of the republic because changing our policies to be more electable is a bridge too far!”

no.5 there is off the rails
1/20/2021 4:29 PM
Look at 'Ole Uofa gettin' all involved. Well here's a simple question for you.

How much money should a College be allowed to accrue across the board in ALL holdings including Trust Funds etc.?
1/20/2021 4:37 PM
Posted by DougOut on 1/20/2021 4:37:00 PM (view original):
Look at 'Ole Uofa gettin' all involved. Well here's a simple question for you.

How much money should a College be allowed to accrue across the board in ALL holdings including Trust Funds etc.?
No cap
1/20/2021 4:42 PM
Posted by Uofa2 on 1/20/2021 4:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DougOut on 1/20/2021 4:37:00 PM (view original):
Look at 'Ole Uofa gettin' all involved. Well here's a simple question for you.

How much money should a College be allowed to accrue across the board in ALL holdings including Trust Funds etc.?
No cap
Good answer.

Do you think it was fair and honest for Harvard and others to apply for and receive Covid-19 relief money?
1/20/2021 4:44 PM
Posted by Uofa2 on 1/20/2021 4:21:00 PM (view original):
Posted by dino27 on 1/20/2021 3:25:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 1/20/2021 2:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by DougOut on 1/20/2021 2:50:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 1/20/2021 1:54:00 PM (view original):
Doug, what would economic indicators have to look like by 2024 for the Biden term to be a success?

What about foreign/domestic policy generally?

Just trying to set some realistic goalposts that we won't move.
Balanced budget
Fair trade CHINA
NO DEAL IRAN - NO NUKES - PERMANENT DAILY UNRESTRICTED INSPECTION
50 States 9 Justice 60 vote Senate
Strict border enforcement - Protect middle class. Fix Big Education. No handouts.
Self-sufficient energy
A balanced budget didn't happen under Trump and won't happen under Biden.

Not sure what Fair trade CHINA means, seems very vague.

The Iran Deal was fine already - if Biden's able to get back into it and resurrect a relationship with their government, it'll be a win.

There's about a 0 percent chance Democrats add states, expand justices, or end the filibuster. Adding states and ending the filibuster would be OK though. Ending the electoral college would be more important.

All of your other points are very vague. No handouts? There were handouts under Trump. He was a failure, then?
This was an excellent response and please let me add
that it is going to be rather impossible to balance the budget under the current tax structure and pandemic circumstances. Even fiscal hawks know this.
and IMO the Iran deal was great.
it took stupid idiots to dismantle it.
Took a lot to not laugh at a Trump supporter calling for self sufficient energy.
Yeah I kinda took a double take on that and figured maybe I misunderstand him. I figured he wanted to go back to more coal.
1/20/2021 4:47 PM
Are we an energy IMPORTER or EXPORTER?

Where will we be in 4 years?
1/20/2021 4:53 PM
Blaming lack of inspections after we got out of the deal.
this is the rationale of trumpers.
this the mentality that led to an insurrection.
no connection to truth or cause and effect.
no straight line thinking.
just wishful thinking and wishful blaming.
1/20/2021 4:56 PM
Where will we ever be if we don’t expand the electric car industry.
trump and gop would not do it.
biden will because he is smart.
1/20/2021 4:58 PM

Iran Inspections in 24 Days? Not Even Close

Iran can easily stretch out the inspection of suspect nuclear sites for three months or more.

The Obama administration assures Americans that the Iran deal grants access within 24 days to undeclared but suspected Iranian nuclear sites. But that’s hardly how a recalcitrant Iran is likely to interpret the deal. A close examination of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action released by the Obama administration reveals that its terms permit Iran to hold inspectors at bay for months, likely three or more.

Paragraphs 74 to 78 govern the International Atomic Energy Agency’s access to suspect sites. First, the IAEA tells Iran “the basis” of its concerns about a particular location, requesting clarification. At this point Iran will know where the IAEA is headed. Iran then provides the IAEA with “explanations” to resolve IAEA concerns. This stage has no time limit.

Opportunities for delay abound. Iran will presumably want to know what prompted the IAEA’s concern. The suspect site identified by the IAEA is likely to be remote, and Iran will no doubt say that it must gather skilled people and equipment to responsibly allay IAEA concerns. Iran may offer explanations in stages, seeking IAEA clarifications before “completing” its response. That could take a while.

Only if Iran’s “explanations do not resolve the IAEA’s concerns” may the IAEA then “request access” to the suspect site. Oddly, the agreement doesn’t specify who judges whether the explanations resolve concerns. If Iran claims that it has a say in the matter, the process may stall here. Assuming Iran grants that the IAEA can be the judge, might Iran claim that the “great Satan” improperly influenced IAEA conclusions? Let’s assume that Tehran won’t do that.

Doesn't matter. It goes on and on and on. It's a deal that is no deal.

1/20/2021 5:06 PM
Except there were inspections regularly and Iran complied until loser trump whacked the deal and then played footsie hoping and praying and kissing the *** of North Korea to get a deal half as good.
1/20/2021 5:13 PM
Are you sure? They just allow us to walk on to any military site anytime?
1/20/2021 5:53 PM
In inspectors and other countries and us inspectors all said there was compliance and they had methods to verify.
there was acclimation on this issue.
what trump did was a stupid tragedy.
1/20/2021 6:06 PM

1/20/2021 6:16 PM
Posted by DougOut on 1/20/2021 6:16:00 PM (view original):

It’s nice to see your response on how your disgraced assclown hero left Washington today to fade off into ignominy.
1/20/2021 6:50 PM
◂ Prev 1...855|856|857|858|859...936 Next ▸
TRUMP: Best President ever Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.