Posted by Uofa2 on 9/12/2020 12:51:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 9/12/2020 11:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 9/12/2020 10:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/12/2020 8:25:00 AM (view original):
Trump:

"Pelosi and Schumer want Trillions of Dollars of BAILOUT money for Blue States that are doing badly, both economically and in terms of high crime, as a condition to making a deal on stimulus - But the USA is coming back strong!"

Anyone wanna point out the obvious and ******* scary problem with this tweet?

So the Repubs want to give money to the people, while Dems want to give money to the Governments, and you're complaining? Got it.
Which Party do you and others claim is "For the people" again?

Oh my god, you're actually this stupid.

It's amazing, really.

You are one very insulting jerk. Try an new experience. Grow UP.. Typical snowflake

lol "snowflake"

You've been looking to be oppressed this whole time. Christianity isn't under attack.

It was that Trump considers blue states and the USA to be two different things, btw.

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/12/2020 6:59:00 PM (view original):
It was that Trump considers blue states and the USA to be two different things, btw.

Please, please, please tell me where you got this tidbit, as I've read 6 articles on the Dems rejecting it and haven't seen this mentioned.

"Pelosi and Schumer want Trillions of Dollars of BAILOUT money for Blue States that are doing badly, both economically and in terms of high crime, as a condition to making a deal on stimulus - But the USA is coming back strong!"

Posted by wylie715 on 9/12/2020 12:48:00 AM (view original):
The reaction is now predictable: Argue for treating undocumented immigrants humanely on American soil and you’ll find yourself accused of believing in “open borders.” As if it’s a binary, either/or position. You either believe in building Trump’s “Great Wall.” You believe in separating children from their parents at the U.S. border. You believe in removing undocumented immigrants from the country who have lived here for decades. Or you believe in “open borders.” It’s a blunt rhetorical trick. It’s crass. But it works. So it’s employed by everyone from the current president down to the many supporters and trolls who carry his water on social media.Fear mongering, of course, lies at the heart of this accusation. The implication being that critics of Trump’s policies, Democrats in particular, don’t care about safety. They don’t mind who comes into the country. And in turn, that accusation comes coupled with insinuations that those immigrants sneaking across our borders are scary, violent people. What-the-latest-immigration-polls-do-and-dont-say"the vast majority of Americans—including most Democrats—don’t believe in so-called “open borders.” That’s not to say that no one believes in open borders. Certainly, there are people who do. But most don’t. And open borders is not a policy the Democratic party supports; it’s not part of their platform. Regardless of how many times Trump and his supporters may claim otherwise.

who wrote this

it can't be wiley, its not talking up the impossibility of epistemology

poor richard maybe

anyway, i give it a A

Posted by all3 on 9/12/2020 10:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/12/2020 6:59:00 PM (view original):
It was that Trump considers blue states and the USA to be two different things, btw.

Please, please, please tell me where you got this tidbit, as I've read 6 articles on the Dems rejecting it and haven't seen this mentioned.

The....the ******* tweet? Trump’s ******* tweet that I posted? That you responded to? Seriously?

You do know the House passed a bill in May that the Senate didn’t get around to at all and couldn’t come up with their own bill until now and that it’s less than a third of what the house offered, right? That the house is offering another round of direct payments to people, which the White House would want because it’d be good for trump (classic political democrats, trying to help trump by helping the people), but that wasn’t even in the senate bill? And that’s one of the reasons the democrats oppose the senate bill? The lack of direct payments to people? I...I just can’t.

At this point, all I can do is recommend that "google" thing I have recommended to you before, because once again you are talking out your azz (or are really, really, really bad at reading comprehension).
As for that tweet being the source, it's no wonder I didn't recognize it, since you twisted it so bad. Typical for you, but don't expect people to follow along when you're doing it.

Posted by all3 on 9/13/2020 9:00:00 AM (view original):
At this point, all I can do is recommend that "google" thing I have recommended to you before, because once again you are talking out your azz (or are really, really, really bad at reading comprehension).
As for that tweet being the source, it's no wonder I didn't recognize it, since you twisted it so bad. Typical for you, but don't expect people to follow along when you're doing it.

What are you talking about???? Dude
-The house passed a bill in May that the Senate never got to while letting the unemployment benefits expire at the end of July
-The bill the Senate introduced is more than 3x less than what the house passed
-The Senate bill does not include direct payments, which makes Trump's tweet even more bs

what exactly do I need to Google here?

How do you "twist" a tweet that you quoted directly?

How do you "twist" a tweet that you quoted directly?

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/13/2020 9:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 9/13/2020 9:00:00 AM (view original):
At this point, all I can do is recommend that "google" thing I have recommended to you before, because once again you are talking out your azz (or are really, really, really bad at reading comprehension).
As for that tweet being the source, it's no wonder I didn't recognize it, since you twisted it so bad. Typical for you, but don't expect people to follow along when you're doing it.

What are you talking about???? Dude
-The house passed a bill in May that the Senate never got to while letting the unemployment benefits expire at the end of July
-The bill the Senate introduced is more than 3x less than what the house passed
-The Senate bill does not include direct payments, which makes Trump's tweet even more bs

what exactly do I need to Google here?

Every article I can find on the subject says something similar to this:

The failed GOP bill would have authorized new money for small businesses, coronavirus testing and schools, and $300 in enhanced weekly enhanced unemployment benefits. The measure included roughly $650 billion in total spending, but it would repurpose roughly $350 billion in previously approved spending, bringing the tally of new funding to around $300 billion.

The measure did not include a second round of $1,200 stimulus checks for individual Americans, even though that’s something the White House supports. It also excluded any new money for cities and states, a top Democratic priority as municipal governments face the prospect of mass layoffs because of plunging tax revenue.

Repubs want money for things that benefit people and small businesses, while the Dems want money to go to smaller Governments. Exactly what I said before, and totally different than you are trying to represent. Either look it up, or learn how to read.

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/13/2020 9:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 9/13/2020 9:00:00 AM (view original):
At this point, all I can do is recommend that "google" thing I have recommended to you before, because once again you are talking out your azz (or are really, really, really bad at reading comprehension).
As for that tweet being the source, it's no wonder I didn't recognize it, since you twisted it so bad. Typical for you, but don't expect people to follow along when you're doing it.

What are you talking about???? Dude
-The house passed a bill in May that the Senate never got to while letting the unemployment benefits expire at the end of July
-The bill the Senate introduced is more than 3x less than what the house passed
-The Senate bill does not include direct payments, which makes Trump's tweet even more bs

what exactly do I need to Google here?

Again, insane person who doesn't live in reality3, what exactly is wrong about those 3 points? Please go on so we can all see just how brainwashed you are.

Posted by all3 on 9/13/2020 12:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 9/13/2020 9:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 9/13/2020 9:00:00 AM (view original):
At this point, all I can do is recommend that "google" thing I have recommended to you before, because once again you are talking out your azz (or are really, really, really bad at reading comprehension).
As for that tweet being the source, it's no wonder I didn't recognize it, since you twisted it so bad. Typical for you, but don't expect people to follow along when you're doing it.

What are you talking about???? Dude
-The house passed a bill in May that the Senate never got to while letting the unemployment benefits expire at the end of July
-The bill the Senate introduced is more than 3x less than what the house passed
-The Senate bill does not include direct payments, which makes Trump's tweet even more bs

what exactly do I need to Google here?

Every article I can find on the subject says something similar to this:

The failed GOP bill would have authorized new money for small businesses, coronavirus testing and schools, and $300 in enhanced weekly enhanced unemployment benefits. The measure included roughly $650 billion in total spending, but it would repurpose roughly $350 billion in previously approved spending, bringing the tally of new funding to around $300 billion.

The measure did not include a second round of $1,200 stimulus checks for individual Americans, even though that’s something the White House supports. It also excluded any new money for cities and states, a top Democratic priority as municipal governments face the prospect of mass layoffs because of plunging tax revenue.

Repubs want money for things that benefit people and small businesses, while the Dems want money to go to smaller Governments. Exactly what I said before, and totally different than you are trying to represent. Either look it up, or learn how to read.

Holy ****.

That money to small - state actually, state - governments goes to...workers. You get that right? People that work for the state, you see that part about massive layoffs? You see that it's only 300b with nothing directly to People? And you're saying it's the Senate bill that's benefiting people, unreal. "Every article I find on this", you realize this bill doesn't exist in a vacuum, that the Senate has done nothing since May and this bill is less than a 3rd what the house passed? Seriously, are you just trolling? The house offered to compromise halfway at 2 trillion and the Senate cut their initial offer instead.

And again the Senate still offers no direct payments and you read that as "benefiting people". This is delusional.