Posted by laramiebob on 4/13/2020 9:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 8:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 4/12/2020 8:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 8:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/12/2020 7:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 7:54:00 PM (view original):
And as far Yang, I'm not sure I agree with a single policy of his, but I do like him. And Tulsi.

Bernie is a dangerous person and you like Tulsi.

Ok.

What's dangerous about Tulsi? Is it dangerous that she calls out Hillary and the democratic establishment? Is it dangerous that she fought for our country? I agree that her policies could have dangerous ramifications if that's where you were going, although I don't think that's what you were talking about.

If you can't see how an apologist of dictators is dangerous, we are in trouble. I haven't had much, if any, correspondence with you as I haven't really posted much since you started posting here, but I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you're smarter than that.

Tulsi was also a huge Sanders supporter in 2016, just FYI.

I don't want to make a different post to reference what Strikeout said about Bernie, but I disagree that he is a Soviet apologist. Here's a quote from a WaPo article about Sanders' trip to Russia in the 80's:

"“I think [Sanders] saw and we all saw the downside of the Soviet system,” Seaver said. “Yes, they may have had low-cost apartments, but things were very out of whack — there were food shortages, no political freedom. I suspect that what Bernie saw in Russia probably affected his views that you see today, where he is not anti-free-enterprise or capitalism but he wants to have a safety net and give a fair shake to all, but certainly not to have a command economy we saw in the Soviet Union.”

Take a look at Bernie's actual quotes, not someone else's synopsis. He is for sure a sympathizer with the leftist dictators. As I said, this is indisputable. He hasn't even tried to dispute it. He's doubled down.

Leaving Bernie out of this.............He's nearly irrelevant now...........

We already HAVE a sympathizer for dictators in the WH at this very minute. Maybe not "leftist" dictators but the affinity for "strongmen in power" is readily apparent. He hasn't tried to dispute that either, more like double down on it to gain support from those folks you referred to as very "evil".
You gonna call him out Coach?

Actually, I've played under many a coach in my life. All of the good ones earned my respect AND made me desire to perform beyond my SELF for my team and teammates.
There was a coach or two that didn't. In both cases it was due to their own Character issues that led to them being extremely poor at leadership and organizational inspiration. In BOTH cases I left the program and went to play for someone who HAD character I could believe in.

Nobody had "R's" or "D's" after their name and thus it was easy to determine the "flaws" of the supposed "leader". You could say I had NO internal bias clouding my judgment. I just made the "call" to call out incompetence and publicly LEAVE the squad/program.

When are WE, collectively as a Nation, gonna speak truth and call out the imposter in the WH?
We ALL (deep down) know just how morally unfit this tonto is to lead us, yet nearly half of us can't put aside our OWN biases and admit we "F'd" up "bigly" and made a poor decision in 2016.

Will you call out incompetent immoral leadership from ALL sides Coach?

I know that I took a long hiatus, but if you remember I am not a Trump supporter. I have grown into a sometimes Trumper. I applaud him when he does good and chastise him when he does stupid.

As as far as 2016, I didn't vote for president as neither met my minimum qualifications. I will be voting for Trump in 2020 as you guys couldn't produce a viable option and the country has decided that moral aptitude is irrelevant.

Posted by all3 on 4/13/2020 4:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/13/2020 4:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/13/2020 3:35:00 PM (view original):
I'll NEVER be proved right or wrong, as we'll NEVER have any idea how HRC would have fared as POTUS, or what would have been found had thousands of people scoured her background 24/7 for four years. You keep HATING.

HRC, famous for not having her background investigated since Whitewater in 1992.

There was a lot more smoke surrounding HRC's past than there was surrounding Trump's during the 2016 election. That didn't stop Dems from wasting 4 years. Why do you think the Repubs would have been any different? The Dems have set such a low bar for the "minority" Party, that I honestly pity whoever our POTUS is in the future. As long as mud-slinging and making the other Party look worse than yours is the goal, instead of making this Country better, we are all scr*wed.

My God I'm being gaslighted. Do you seriously not remember the Obama administration? The Republicans broke precedent and skirted the rules to reject his SC appointment. They did everything possible to stop him passing his agenda. Did you not watch Fox News or listen to conservative radio ONCE from 2008-2016?

And the "smoke surrounding Hillary's past" compared to Trump is nothing. I'm not a Hillary defender, but that's just wrong.

This is like those buffoons who say "there wasn't any racism in America before Obama got elected. BLM caused all the racism to come back".

I dislike the Bureau of Land Management as much as anybody but I don't think they had anything to do with bringing back racism...........wait.

The racism resurfaced as a backlash because a black family actually had the gall to sleep IN the WH, not just the servant's shack!

I wasn't originally going to respond to strikeout's post, but I'm almost certain more righties think racism increased under Obama than lefties.

The racists became more vocal, but there weren't more of them.

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/13/2020 8:54:00 PM (view original):
Come on now. Don't play that postmodern, neo-marxist crap. The number of racists in America are very, very small. It's ludicrous to act like our country became more racist because Obama was president. He won the majority of the vote twice and most people that didn't vote for him didn't do so because of his ideologies, not his skin color. You know this and I know this. This is just an attempt by the left to be intentionally divisive.

TOTAL BULLSHIT. This country is at LEAST 35% racist ********. Obama was attacked mercilessly for eight years with the fact that he’s black as their base for hate. What country do you live in? Because it’s not THIS one if you’re IGNORANT enough to say, “The number of racists in America are very, very small.”

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/13/2020 4:37:00 PM (view original):

Posted by laramiebob on 4/13/2020 9:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 8:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 4/12/2020 8:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 8:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by Uofa2 on 4/12/2020 7:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/12/2020 7:54:00 PM (view original):
And as far Yang, I'm not sure I agree with a single policy of his, but I do like him. And Tulsi.

Bernie is a dangerous person and you like Tulsi.

Ok.

What's dangerous about Tulsi? Is it dangerous that she calls out Hillary and the democratic establishment? Is it dangerous that she fought for our country? I agree that her policies could have dangerous ramifications if that's where you were going, although I don't think that's what you were talking about.

If you can't see how an apologist of dictators is dangerous, we are in trouble. I haven't had much, if any, correspondence with you as I haven't really posted much since you started posting here, but I am going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you're smarter than that.

Tulsi was also a huge Sanders supporter in 2016, just FYI.

I don't want to make a different post to reference what Strikeout said about Bernie, but I disagree that he is a Soviet apologist. Here's a quote from a WaPo article about Sanders' trip to Russia in the 80's:

"“I think [Sanders] saw and we all saw the downside of the Soviet system,” Seaver said. “Yes, they may have had low-cost apartments, but things were very out of whack — there were food shortages, no political freedom. I suspect that what Bernie saw in Russia probably affected his views that you see today, where he is not anti-free-enterprise or capitalism but he wants to have a safety net and give a fair shake to all, but certainly not to have a command economy we saw in the Soviet Union.”

Take a look at Bernie's actual quotes, not someone else's synopsis. He is for sure a sympathizer with the leftist dictators. As I said, this is indisputable. He hasn't even tried to dispute it. He's doubled down.

Leaving Bernie out of this.............He's nearly irrelevant now...........

We already HAVE a sympathizer for dictators in the WH at this very minute. Maybe not "leftist" dictators but the affinity for "strongmen in power" is readily apparent. He hasn't tried to dispute that either, more like double down on it to gain support from those folks you referred to as very "evil".
You gonna call him out Coach?

Actually, I've played under many a coach in my life. All of the good ones earned my respect AND made me desire to perform beyond my SELF for my team and teammates.
There was a coach or two that didn't. In both cases it was due to their own Character issues that led to them being extremely poor at leadership and organizational inspiration. In BOTH cases I left the program and went to play for someone who HAD character I could believe in.

Nobody had "R's" or "D's" after their name and thus it was easy to determine the "flaws" of the supposed "leader". You could say I had NO internal bias clouding my judgment. I just made the "call" to call out incompetence and publicly LEAVE the squad/program.

When are WE, collectively as a Nation, gonna speak truth and call out the imposter in the WH?
We ALL (deep down) know just how morally unfit this tonto is to lead us, yet nearly half of us can't put aside our OWN biases and admit we "F'd" up "bigly" and made a poor decision in 2016.

Will you call out incompetent immoral leadership from ALL sides Coach?

I know that I took a long hiatus, but if you remember I am not a Trump supporter. I have grown into a sometimes Trumper. I applaud him when he does good and chastise him when he does stupid.

As as far as 2016, I didn't vote for president as neither met my minimum qualifications. I will be voting for Trump in 2020 as you guys couldn't produce a viable option and the country has decided that moral aptitude is irrelevant.

WOWEE! I got news for you Coach.
You've clearly lowered your standards/qualifications since 2016.
That's a shame. I hate it when Coaches and supposed leaders sacrifice their principles.
That's a sure sign that they're a poor leader and an ineffective Coach.
You can't lead young folks to personal success with a lack of personal integrity oneself--and a Coach with lowered minimum qualifications for National leadership is a poor example for our youth.
Good thing I'm not your A.D. this morning.
You'd be looking for a job tomorrow most likely!

And posting publicly that you are voting for Trump in 2020 makes you unequivocally a Trump supporter.
And that's just a shame.
And shamefully poor judgment.

bob, I quit doing it, but I bet you still read the horrible sheit that people like rsp post. It's people like him who have turned people like strikeout and I totally against the Dems. How can anyone support a Party that has so many people spreading nothing but hatred and divisiveness, while claiming to be for peace and unity?

Hey Bob. I haven't lowered my standards. I told you that I was a sometimes Trumper. You guys couldn't produce even a semblance of sanity to run against him. My issues in 2016 with Trump were that he was a swindler and womanizer. If the allegations against Biden are correct, you guys have ran a swindler and womanizer against Trump. If I'm going to have to pick between two swindlers and womanizers, I'm going to go with the one that governs at least semi-conservatively. Don't forget, I am a conservative. (Actually, I'm a classical liberal, but that aligns more with conservatism than what the Dems have turned into.)

We've seen the horrors that socialism produces and, unfortunately, you guys have become the socialist party. If you moved back towards true liberalism and away from government-controlled everything, I might sing a different tune.

Posted by rsp777 on 4/14/2020 7:39:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/13/2020 8:54:00 PM (view original):
Come on now. Don't play that postmodern, neo-marxist crap. The number of racists in America are very, very small. It's ludicrous to act like our country became more racist because Obama was president. He won the majority of the vote twice and most people that didn't vote for him didn't do so because of his ideologies, not his skin color. You know this and I know this. This is just an attempt by the left to be intentionally divisive.

TOTAL BULLSHIT. This country is at LEAST 35% racist ********. Obama was attacked mercilessly for eight years with the fact that he’s black as their base for hate. What country do you live in? Because it’s not THIS one if you’re IGNORANT enough to say, “The number of racists in America are very, very small.”

Show the evidence. I'm going to guess that you can't.

Posted by all3 on 4/14/2020 9:30:00 AM (view original):
bob, I quit doing it, but I bet you still read the horrible sheit that people like rsp post. It's people like him who have turned people like strikeout and I totally against the Dems. How can anyone support a Party that has so many people spreading nothing but hatred and divisiveness, while claiming to be for peace and unity?

And white nationalists vote Republican. So what's your point? Am I supposed to assume that Trump is pro-white ethnostate because some of his supporters are? What an asinine way to vote. Cowardly too. Just come out and tell us that you like Trump and his policies, don't hide behind this "democrats forced my hand" bullshit.

Posted by strikeout26 on 4/14/2020 10:18:00 AM (view original):
Hey Bob. I haven't lowered my standards. I told you that I was a sometimes Trumper. You guys couldn't produce even a semblance of sanity to run against him. My issues in 2016 with Trump were that he was a swindler and womanizer. If the allegations against Biden are correct, you guys have ran a swindler and womanizer against Trump. If I'm going to have to pick between two swindlers and womanizers, I'm going to go with the one that governs at least semi-conservatively. Don't forget, I am a conservative. (Actually, I'm a classical liberal, but that aligns more with conservatism than what the Dems have turned into.)

We've seen the horrors that socialism produces and, unfortunately, you guys have become the socialist party. If you moved back towards true liberalism and away from government-controlled everything, I might sing a different tune.

This isn't a gotcha; I'm legitimately curious which candidates in the Dem field you would have voted for over Trump.