Posted by tangplay on 9/27/2019 11:56:00 AM (view original):
Posted by gomiami1972 on 9/27/2019 9:57:00 AM (view original):
Posted by laramiebob on 9/27/2019 8:33:00 AM (view original):
IF she can't which Dem. can? In your opinion, of course. I will NOT vote for Trump, but I will NOT vote for a dem that is NOT a quality candidate for POTUS.
Just like HRC in 2016. Does it take a repeat for the Dems. to get it?? Biden is a sure loser. Way way too much baggage. He's even in the way on the current Trump scandal. All Trumpsters have to do is keep saying 50 Grand a month for what??
This latest "Trump scandal" is probably engineered to drive Biden's numbers down rather than to cause Trump any damage. The DNC seems comfortable with a Warren/Sanders type to get the nomination. It's really strange because Warren/Sanders is more of a stone cold loss than Biden.
Weird take. The DNC likes Sanders over Biden?
Well, I don't know if the word "like" is appropriate. I said the DNC would be comfortable. The vibes I am getting from the primary (just my opinion, mind you) is that the Democrat donor class wants Biden out of the lead position. Warren is probably the preferred choice because she has the correct genitalia, although I don't see any idological difference between her platform and Sanders' (which is why I said Warren/Sanders type.) I think I read somewhere that they have a pact not to go after each other in hopes of moving the socialist agenda forward. So, he can function as a very useful wingman for her nomination.
Unless the donor class fully endorses one of the lesser candidates soon, the DNC is in a tough spot for 2020. In the long term, strategically, a Warren/young ideologue VP candidacy (even if it results in a loss) does more for the Party than a Biden/anyone VP candidacy (even if it results in a loss.) To me, it makes sense...although I may not be explaining myself very clearly at the moment. I literaly just had chemo on Wednesday so I'm not at my best.