Posted by The Taint on 3/16/2019 2:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by all3 on 3/16/2019 1:22:00 PM (view original):
Posted by The Taint on 3/16/2019 12:28:00 PM (view original):
lol
Even with 1000s of people trying to dig-up proof against Trump for over 2 years, what exactly has been proven?
Even though nobody, including her Party, gives a sheit about HRC, we're still getting new facts about her and her supporters. Just days ago we found out HRC's people coerced the DOJ into limiting FBI access to Clinton Foundation records. Why? What's in those records? Can't imagine the depths of HRC and "friends" we'd be hearing about if the same 1000s had been digging-up dirt o them for the last 2+ years.
Both Parties are corrupt, self-serving, liars, regardless of what you need to try telling yourself.
How many years have people been digging up **** on the Clintons?
2 years. ...lol.
we've got a blow job folks!
how many campaign managers, cabinet members, and Trump associates going to jail does it take before you start thinking there is probably something amiss?
how many indictments?
I'm positive there's corruption in both parties but that wasn't what your initial dumbassery was about
You hate Trump. I get it. Many do. That hatred doesn't make things he's accused of true. Why can't all those people looking find any hard proof? How many "smoking guns" have the Libs gone through in 2 years? Again, I don't think anyone can be that good about hiding/covering-up their activities, in this day and age.
Like I said, you can keep telling yourself one Party is "better" and less corrupt than the other, but most sensible people are willing to accept the truth, that that just isn't so, and yes, an "interesting" choice of when to vote on Obama care is one small example, as are many things HRC did.
You can also keep kidding yourself that there has ever been a POTUS (and family) scrutinized and researched the way Trump has been, but again, that just isn't true.
I just can't understand why the hurry or insistence or whatever anyone wants to call it, to keep trying to ruin someone BEFORE they find any evidence. All I've ever said is wait until there is evidence, THEN act. That just follows the basic American policy of Innocent until PROVEN Guilty. Shouldn't the Leader of the Country be afforded that?