Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

You just said Obama improved the economy? LOL. Trump is also fairly polarizing. We'll see how he does in 2020. Thanks for admitting that under Trump the economy is flourishing and that you don't care.

Posted by all3 on 11/7/2018 2:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 10:16:00 AM (view original):
Favorite part of last night: Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania realizing they ****** up in 2016 and trying to make up for it by electing Dem governors.

Eat a dick, Scott Walker.

b_l spreading lies again. PA RE-elected the same Democratic Governor they already had.
I wish this idiot would just once get something totally true.

BL is an idiot. That we can all agree on.

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 11/7/2018 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

Even though I'm not a fan of Trump, the Democrats will have a tough time beating him in 2020 if the economy stays as it is now. Who do you think should run against him?

I'd run a war vet and a moderate. Which neither Biden nor O'Rourke are.

They need a moderate female minority war vet.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 11/7/2018 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

Even though I'm not a fan of Trump, the Democrats will have a tough time beating him in 2020 if the economy stays as it is now. Who do you think should run against him?

I'd run a war vet and a moderate. Which neither Biden nor O'Rourke are.

What tf are you talking about? Biden is a moderate.

Posted by all3 on 11/7/2018 2:25:00 PM (view original):
They need a moderate female minority war vet.

LOL - I think if they ran Sinema as a VP they may be OK. She is not bad looking, a centrist, swings both ways and well spoken. As far as President I am not sure who they should run with her but it would need to be someone charismatic and a war vet. If they run Harris, Booker, Biden, Sanders, Warren....they will lose IMO. As I said, Beto IMO is awkward and lost to Cruz in his debate and badly. To me Cruz is a C- debater so Beto cannot beat him, he will get crushed by Trump and or Pence.

Posted by tangplay on 11/7/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 11/7/2018 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

Even though I'm not a fan of Trump, the Democrats will have a tough time beating him in 2020 if the economy stays as it is now. Who do you think should run against him?

I'd run a war vet and a moderate. Which neither Biden nor O'Rourke are.

What tf are you talking about? Biden is a moderate.

Biden said Romney would put black people back in chains. That is your definition of Moderate??!?!?! Are you kidding me.

If I were the Dems I'd run Jimmy Panneta as POTUS and Sinema as VP. They'd have a shot against Trump / Pence IMO.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

You just said Obama improved the economy? LOL. Trump is also fairly polarizing. We'll see how he does in 2020. Thanks for admitting that under Trump the economy is flourishing and that you don't care.

What? Obama did improve the economy but unemployment didn't get below 7% until 2014. A lot of people were going through really hard times when Obama's approval was so low in 2010.

Of course the economy is strong right now. No one has argued otherwise.

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

You just said Obama improved the economy? LOL. Trump is also fairly polarizing. We'll see how he does in 2020. Thanks for admitting that under Trump the economy is flourishing and that you don't care.

What? Obama did improve the economy but unemployment didn't get below 7% until 2014. A lot of people were going through really hard times when Obama's approval was so low in 2010.

Of course the economy is strong right now. No one has argued otherwise.

And you also know that the economy is usually the #1 predictor of POTUS re-election.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/7/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 11/7/2018 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

Even though I'm not a fan of Trump, the Democrats will have a tough time beating him in 2020 if the economy stays as it is now. Who do you think should run against him?

I'd run a war vet and a moderate. Which neither Biden nor O'Rourke are.

What tf are you talking about? Biden is a moderate.

Biden said Romney would put black people back in chains. That is your definition of Moderate??!?!?! Are you kidding me.

One comment like that doesn't preclude him from being moderate. But he wouldn't be a great choice.

There will be a handful of Senators going for it---Harris, Booker, Brown, Gillibrand, Klobuchar. I like Klobuchar abut she's probably too moderate to really have a chance. Harris would slay in debates but might have issues in the mid-west because, well...racism.

Governor Inslee is probably a good dark horse right now.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

You just said Obama improved the economy? LOL. Trump is also fairly polarizing. We'll see how he does in 2020. Thanks for admitting that under Trump the economy is flourishing and that you don't care.

What? Obama did improve the economy but unemployment didn't get below 7% until 2014. A lot of people were going through really hard times when Obama's approval was so low in 2010.

Of course the economy is strong right now. No one has argued otherwise.

And you also know that the economy is usually the #1 predictor of POTUS re-election.

Normally.

But normally the president isn't constantly stepping on his own dick and worrying about impeachment. That the economy is so strong and his approval is so low says a lot.

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 2:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/7/2018 2:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:21:00 PM (view original):

Posted by ncmusician_7 on 11/7/2018 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

Even though I'm not a fan of Trump, the Democrats will have a tough time beating him in 2020 if the economy stays as it is now. Who do you think should run against him?

I'd run a war vet and a moderate. Which neither Biden nor O'Rourke are.

What tf are you talking about? Biden is a moderate.

Biden said Romney would put black people back in chains. That is your definition of Moderate??!?!?! Are you kidding me.

One comment like that doesn't preclude him from being moderate. But he wouldn't be a great choice.

There will be a handful of Senators going for it---Harris, Booker, Brown, Gillibrand, Klobuchar. I like Klobuchar abut she's probably too moderate to really have a chance. Harris would slay in debates but might have issues in the mid-west because, well...racism.

Governor Inslee is probably a good dark horse right now.

LOL - OK....back to racism for Leftist bad luck. Nothing to do with the fact that Harris is utterly detestable. If the Dems run Panetta and Sinema they'd have a great shot IMO. If they run your people they will lose IMO. Although the debates between Trump and Spartacus would be entertaining.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/7/2018 2:25:00 PM (view original):
They need a moderate female minority war vet.

LOL - I think if they ran Sinema as a VP they may be OK. She is not bad looking, a centrist, swings both ways and well spoken. As far as President I am not sure who they should run with her but it would need to be someone charismatic and a war vet. If they run Harris, Booker, Biden, Sanders, Warren....they will lose IMO. As I said, Beto IMO is awkward and lost to Cruz in his debate and badly. To me Cruz is a C- debater so Beto cannot beat him, he will get crushed by Trump and or Pence.

Sinema has to win to be seriously talked about at all. That ain't happened (yet) and it's doubtful IMO.
AZ voted over overwhelmingly (as usual) Repug.

It BETTER NOT be Biden (too OLD, too many drinks, likes to talk too much), Or Booker (he ain't Obama and black man Beta won't work), Sanders (see Biden minus the drinks), or Po.Warren or K. Harris (needs more seasoning), NONE of those will go anywhere with me (and Most of the) Independents around thew Country. Needs to be a fresh new face with some actual gravitas (preferably male!) some real Intellect and charisma to "catch" folks interest, and Flake to run as a 3rd Party candidate. With those things a ___________/Sinema ticket could work.

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 2:45:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 2:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 2:19:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/7/2018 12:14:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/7/2018 11:40:00 AM (view original):
Trumps approval rating on par to BHOs and WJCs after their first two years and he lost a lot fewer seats in Congress than they did after their first midterms and both got re-elected....interesting right?

Interesting that you're leaving a whole lot of context out of Obama's low approval rating.

The economy is basically as strong as it can be. It's not like unemployment can ever get to actual zero and Trump's approval is still in the shitter.

You just said Obama improved the economy? LOL. Trump is also fairly polarizing. We'll see how he does in 2020. Thanks for admitting that under Trump the economy is flourishing and that you don't care.

What? Obama did improve the economy but unemployment didn't get below 7% until 2014. A lot of people were going through really hard times when Obama's approval was so low in 2010.

Of course the economy is strong right now. No one has argued otherwise.

And you also know that the economy is usually the #1 predictor of POTUS re-election.

Normally.

But normally the president isn't constantly stepping on his own dick and worrying about impeachment. That the economy is so strong and his approval is so low says a lot.

He is polarizing. That is both his appeal and his weakness. Economy under WJC was pretty good too and his rating was low. People are finicky. If Trump cured cancer you'd still despise him. The economy is irrelevant to you and there are millions in the US just like you. Cannot get over the 2016 loss and embarrassment.