You listed the offense stats.

Posted by zubinsum on 3/7/2017 12:12:00 AM (view original):
MLB117707

I feel like a newbie, where can I go and put this league # in and see the stats?

Use the following link, withe the league number added for the X's...

https://www.whatifsports.com/mlb-l/view.asp?lid=XXXXXXX

This league is no longer visable.

229 + plays (including 29 from Maddux's)
.

Regular Season Fielding SimStats (Totals)
Player	SN	Pos	G	GS	Inn	PO	A	E	DP	+	-	Fld%	RF
Childs, Cupid	1896	2B	163	163	1,473.7	369	635	36	74	46	2	.965	6.13
Baker, Frank	1912	3B	163	163	1,473.7	103	301	19	16	19	0	.955	2.47
Combs, Earle	1927	RF	163	163	1,471.7	334	3	7	0	30	0	.980	2.06
Speaker, Tris	1914	1B	158	158	1,428.7	1784	155	10	101	30	2	.995	12.21
Musial, Stan	1946	LF	158	158	1,428.7	206	1	2	0	8	0	.990	1.30
Speaker, Tris	1913	CF	157	157	1,415.3	359	4	23	0	31	2	.940	2.31
Bancroft, Dave	1922	SS	163	163	1,409.7	377	497	41	84	33	0	.955	5.58
Farrell, Duke	1891	C	163	163	1,405.0	709	88	6	1	0	0	.993	5.11
Maddux, Greg	1994	P	46	0	320.7	17	28	0	0	3	0	1.000	1.26
Maddux, Greg	1995	P	60	0	264.7	17	19	0	0	7	0	1.000	1.22
Maddux, Greg	1993	P	42	0	254.3	11	18	4	1	7	0	.879	1.03
Maddux, Greg	1997	P	103	0	202.0	10	12	1	0	2	0	.957	.98
Maddux, Greg	1992	P	51	0	179.3	6	18	2	0	3	0	.923	1.20
Maddux, Greg	1996	P	42	0	153.0	8	10	2	1	7	0	.900	1.06
Rothrock, Jack	1925	SS	34	0	64.0	14	20	2	1	0	2	.944	4.78
Lapp, Jack	1909	C	31	0	62.7	24	5	0	1	0	0	1.000	4.16
Speaker, Tris	1914	CF	5	5	45.0	10	0	0	0	2	0	1.000	2.00
Venable, Max	1989	LF	5	5	45.0	4	0	1	0	0	0	.800	.80
Musial, Stan	1946	1B	5	5	45.0	53	5	0	1	1	0	1.000	11.60
Maddux, Greg	1998	P	18	0	44.0	2	4	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.23
Maddux, Greg	2000	P	26	0	35.3	1	4	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.27
Maddux, Greg	2001	P	14	0	20.3	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.00
Jackson, Joe	1918	CF	1	1	13.3	2	0	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.35
Hargreaves, Charlie	1923	C	4	0	6.0	1	0	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.50
Jackson, Joe	1918	RF	1	0	2.0	0	0	0	0	0	0	.000	.00
TEAM TOTALS	--	--	1776	1304	13,263.0	4421	1827	156	281	229	8	.976	-

Posted by duece_duece on 3/6/2017 11:38:00 PM (view original):
Well I'm going to call that one the RECORD for now zub, can you post a link to the team page? If anyone can beat 267 post it here and claim the title!!

Player	SN	Pos	G	GS	Inn	PO	A	E	DP	+	-	Fld%	RF
Erstad, Darin	2002	1B	162	162	1,432.3	1816	152	0	144	40	0	1.000	12.37
Welch, Curt	1887	2B	162	162	1,432.3	427	530	50	95	55	0	.950	6.01
Wagner, Honus	1901	SS	162	162	1,432.3	381	599	64	122	48	1	.939	6.16
Douthit, Taylor	1928	RF	162	162	1,432.3	344	8	10	1	40	1	.972	2.21
Ashburn, Richie	1951	LF	162	162	1,432.3	351	7	4	0	37	0	.989	2.25
Cameron, Mike	2003	CF	160	160	1,402.3	464	2	8	1	39	1	.983	2.99
Piazza, Mike	1997	C	160	160	1,333.3	254	100	13	5	0	0	.965	2.39
Blair, Paul	1970	3B	118	118	1,046.3	122	288	8	15	32	0	.981	3.53
Lawrie, Brett	2011	3B	44	44	386.0	45	108	6	4	8	0	.962	3.57
Wiltse, Snake	1902	P	63	0	384.3	13	28	9	1	9	0	.820	.96
Carrick, Bill	1902	P	64	0	319.0	14	13	2	2	1	1	.931	.76
Mitchell, Fred	1904	P	63	0	122.3	9	10	1	0	2	0	.950	1.40
Wheeler, George	1898	P	64	0	105.7	6	7	0	0	2	0	1.000	1.11
Sweetland, Les	1927	P	30	0	100.7	2	5	0	0	0	0	1.000	.63
Shireman, Austin (P)	2018	C	41	2	99.0	25	3	0	1	0	0	1.000	2.55
Causey, Red	1919	P	57	0	90.0	3	4	0	0	2	0	1.000	.70
Sudhoff, Willie	1899	P	36	0	74.0	3	2	0	0	1	0	1.000	.61
Escandell, Lou (P)	2018	P	51	0	73.0	2	2	0	0	0	0	1.000	.49
Hoza, Minnie (P)	2018	P	45	0	64.7	5	6	0	0	0	0	1.000	1.53
Aker, Jack	1972	P	59	0	64.7	2	7	1	0	1	0	.900	1.25
Young, Chris	2017	P	15	0	34.0	2	0	1	0	0	1	.667	.53
Blair, Paul	1970	CF	9	2	30.0	7	0	0	0	1	0	1.000	2.10
TEAM TOTALS	--	--	1889	1296	12,891.0	4297	1881	177	391	318	5	.972	-

Was an attempt to set an all time record, so spent $60 million on hitting in an open league. somehow won 67 games with an obscenely bad pitching staff. My goal was 300 and it looked for a while like I'd come up short, but went on a huge run near the end of the season.

^ A team like that has an advantage too. A bad pitching staff means more balls in play

yes that was a key part of the strategy. i tried to draft bad pitchers who gave up a ton of hits but didn't give up too many walks or home runs, to give the great fielders more potential hits to take away. also got a few really good range pitchers on the roster, although with that little money to spend, there wasn't much choice.

https://www.whatifsports.com/mlb-l/playerstats.asp?teamid=1422106

256 +plays. Team finished 80-82, lost regular season match-ups with all 3 play-off opponents but won the World Series

Not an OL but made a team for this.

LF 1914 Tris Speaker 3.37 RRF
CF 1951 Richie Ashburn 3.40 RRF
RF 1920 Edd Roush 3.27 RRF
1B 1897 Bill Joyce 11.62 RRF
2B 1912 Bill Sweeney 6.44 RRF
3B 1929 Jimmy ***** 3.90 RRF
SS 2017 Elvis Andrus 6.24 RRF
C 1887 John Kerins 10.11 RRF

This team will probably suck on offense but whatever. I got two deadball pitchers (08 Walsh, 88 Buffinton) and I play at Municipal. Hopefully I can get some monster stats

Edit: I’ll give updates when I have time

Thru 56 games I have 63 plus plays. But I can’t help but feel disappointed. Bill Joyce has 6 + plays and Jimmy ***** only has 2!!! Kerins has 0 but I don’t know if catchers can get plus plays.

edit: can’t figure out how to post the image without it being wayyy too ******* big.

catchers can't make + plays

there's huge variance in these, even more than HRs for hitters. you'll have a guy get 10 in 10 games and then not get one for the next 20 games.

I’m disappointed my team only finished with 179 + plays.

Also I have a question but I don’t want to make a separate thread for it.

So on this team, I drafted Bob Milacki, with the intention on saving all year, like people usually do. Well he had come in on 3 games this year, and has thrown a total of 3 innings. 34 pitches right. So postseason comes and since he was hardly used, I figured I could get 2-3 starts from him in the postseason. So I scheduled him to start game 1 in the playoffs.

He throws a 118 pitches and a CG. But now his fatigue is at 60 and after 2 more games, it hasn’t moved a bit.

Did I **** up? Or does WIS not really care about regular season usage when adding IPs for postseason


edit: he threw 365 pitches in real life. So I used 34 in the regular season. Then doesn’t WIS add 10% for the postseason?

So that’s 401 pitches I should be able to get out of him. Then he throws 118 so I should still have 249 pitches left I can get out of him.

I know it’s only been two games since his start, but it concerns me that I’ve used 32% of the pitches he can throw, with one 7 game series left in the season, and his fatigue is super low and hasn’t moved. Thought he’d be right at 100 after the next game.

Posted by d_rock97 on 9/6/2018 5:35:00 AM (view original):
I’m disappointed my team only finished with 179 + plays.

Also I have a question but I don’t want to make a separate thread for it.

So on this team, I drafted Bob Milacki, with the intention on saving all year, like people usually do. Well he had come in on 3 games this year, and has thrown a total of 3 innings. 34 pitches right. So postseason comes and since he was hardly used, I figured I could get 2-3 starts from him in the postseason. So I scheduled him to start game 1 in the playoffs.

He throws a 118 pitches and a CG. But now his fatigue is at 60 and after 2 more games, it hasn’t moved a bit.

Did I **** up? Or does WIS not really care about regular season usage when adding IPs for postseason


edit: he threw 365 pitches in real life. So I used 34 in the regular season. Then doesn’t WIS add 10% for the postseason?

So that’s 401 pitches I should be able to get out of him. Then he throws 118 so I should still have 249 pitches left I can get out of him.

I know it’s only been two games since his start, but it concerns me that I’ve used 32% of the pitches he can throw, with one 7 game series left in the season, and his fatigue is super low and hasn’t moved. Thought he’d be right at 100 after the next game.

Whatif did a fix many years ago to prevent this strategy. If I'm not mistaken they set every pitcher on a playoff roster to a minimum of 95% used up. Someone could check me on the percentage.

Edit: Pitchers who are above 95% usage do not get reset.

I haven’t been around WIS that long. What is wrong with this strategy? Why would this need to be changed?