Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 10:06:00 PM (view original):
Yes, the pattern is that all of the countries you listed have MUCH smaller populations.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 10:10:00 PM (view original):
Population makes a huge difference.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 9:50:00 PM (view original):
Gomiami,

you just thoroughly offended every marxist by comparing Marxism to socialism. I have found out that is no-no.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 10:13:00 PM (view original):
You do realize that raising taxes on the top 1% doesn't even come close to covering that $13 Trillion. That's assuming his figures are correct. I'm guessing they are low as well.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 10:19:00 PM (view original):
The increased tax base doesn't make up for the much greater number of indigent.

Posted by strikeout26 on 7/4/2018 10:23:00 PM (view original):
Also, remember that democratic socialism is a step towards Marxism. Read das capital and you will understand this.

Posted by tangplay on 7/4/2018 9:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 7/4/2018 1:56:00 PM (view original):
What Socialists propose would place a huge burden on taxpayers.

Most Americans want choices in Healthcare. They don't want to be waiting months for surgeries, or to be told that Grandma is too old or not a worthy candidate for care. They don't want the government making those decisions. Rationed Healthcare sucks.

Free education? Once again, there is a price. Do the math.

That is true.
You have two options to pay for both free healthcare AND free education, which at max cost 100 bn dollars over 10 years.

1: Increase the top 1% of people's taxes slightly.

2: Cut the military budget by 10 bn