Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:38:00 AM (view original):
I'll use capital letters.

IF A PERP SHOOTS AT A POLICE OFFICER AND THE OFFICER SHOOTS BACK AND KILLS HIM, IS THAT DUE PROCESS?

To answer your questions:

#1) I am tougher than you because I can gauge by your rhetoric that you are fairly weak minded. Fact that you laud your athletic skills aka Al Bundy, I played high school football is laughable.

#2) I am a better parent because I don't teach my kids drivel such as white privilege and institutional racism. I teach them to treat each person and situation on an individual basis and don't ever bring home a freaking Yankees fan.

#3) I believe we need changes on the border. You don't. But then you complain about how the illegals are treated. Is that not the definition of "idiot"? I never said my suggestions were not radical. I said they were logical.

You are like the ACLU. You would rather live to the letter of the law and see a million people die than use logic and save them.

No, that's self defense. The police officer has a right to defend his own life, he isn't administratively waiving due process.

1) Weird.
2) Like how you hope they marry someone of the same race?
3) Wanting changes at the border doesn't require waiving due process.

So the border agent cannot defend the country from these persons and send them back? Maybe he is defending my life because those people may shoot me? So we DO give the police some wiggle room. Correct?

#1) But True
#2) I never said that. I said my parents wanted me to marry someone Jewish. I didn't for the record. But nice try.
#3) We established that we are not waving it but we are giving border agents more authority.

When I say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what due process it, this is what I mean. The border patrol agent does defend the country by arresting suspected illegal immigrants. He doesn't get to act as judge.

1) I'm pretty sure the whole "who is a better athlete" thing was started by you.
2) You said "even the least racist people want their kids to marry someone of the same race."
3) Due process is binary. It's either there or it isn't.

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:56:00 AM (view original):
BTW, the 'defending from someone potentially shooting you' isn't an argument against illegal immigration, it's an argument against everyone. Maybe we should deport Bracco, he could potentially shoot you, CCCP! Maybe we should deport all3! He could potentially cause danger to some of us!

They are citizens and have citizens rights. People who come here illegally do not. Stepping foot on our soil illegally should not give them equal rights to people who are here legally. In my opinion.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:38:00 AM (view original):
I'll use capital letters.

IF A PERP SHOOTS AT A POLICE OFFICER AND THE OFFICER SHOOTS BACK AND KILLS HIM, IS THAT DUE PROCESS?

To answer your questions:

#1) I am tougher than you because I can gauge by your rhetoric that you are fairly weak minded. Fact that you laud your athletic skills aka Al Bundy, I played high school football is laughable.

#2) I am a better parent because I don't teach my kids drivel such as white privilege and institutional racism. I teach them to treat each person and situation on an individual basis and don't ever bring home a freaking Yankees fan.

#3) I believe we need changes on the border. You don't. But then you complain about how the illegals are treated. Is that not the definition of "idiot"? I never said my suggestions were not radical. I said they were logical.

You are like the ACLU. You would rather live to the letter of the law and see a million people die than use logic and save them.

No, that's self defense. The police officer has a right to defend his own life, he isn't administratively waiving due process.

1) Weird.
2) Like how you hope they marry someone of the same race?
3) Wanting changes at the border doesn't require waiving due process.

So the border agent cannot defend the country from these persons and send them back? Maybe he is defending my life because those people may shoot me? So we DO give the police some wiggle room. Correct?

#1) But True
#2) I never said that. I said my parents wanted me to marry someone Jewish. I didn't for the record. But nice try.
#3) We established that we are not waving it but we are giving border agents more authority.

When I say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what due process it, this is what I mean. The border patrol agent does defend the country by arresting suspected illegal immigrants. He doesn't get to act as judge.

1) I'm pretty sure the whole "who is a better athlete" thing was started by you.
2) You said "even the least racist people want their kids to marry someone of the same race."
3) Due process is binary. It's either there or it isn't.

Wooooooow....no no no you guys don't want them arrested because then in your words "they make toddlers cry". I am all for allowing arrests but you don't want that. If you agree to arrests I am fine with that. 100%.

#1) Nope. I said from my personal experience, African Americans toast me in sports. You said you would too.
#2) Yes. But I never said that about me. I don't care who they marry so long as they aren't Yankees or Jets fans. Actually they have to be taller than them too. Sorry, a father's right. Oh and they can't be liberals. :)
#3) Only the Sith deal in absolutes.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:47:00 AM (view original):
CCCP, if due process goes, what stops the government from arresting you, me, or anyone else without trial?

Strawman. I said give agents more authority at the border only. I never said eliminate due process and certainly not for people here legally. LOL. Listen to the podcast and then talk to me.

When someone is arrested by a border patrol agent, is the person in custody a suspect?

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:38:00 AM (view original):
I'll use capital letters.

IF A PERP SHOOTS AT A POLICE OFFICER AND THE OFFICER SHOOTS BACK AND KILLS HIM, IS THAT DUE PROCESS?

To answer your questions:

#1) I am tougher than you because I can gauge by your rhetoric that you are fairly weak minded. Fact that you laud your athletic skills aka Al Bundy, I played high school football is laughable.

#2) I am a better parent because I don't teach my kids drivel such as white privilege and institutional racism. I teach them to treat each person and situation on an individual basis and don't ever bring home a freaking Yankees fan.

#3) I believe we need changes on the border. You don't. But then you complain about how the illegals are treated. Is that not the definition of "idiot"? I never said my suggestions were not radical. I said they were logical.

You are like the ACLU. You would rather live to the letter of the law and see a million people die than use logic and save them.

No, that's self defense. The police officer has a right to defend his own life, he isn't administratively waiving due process.

1) Weird.
2) Like how you hope they marry someone of the same race?
3) Wanting changes at the border doesn't require waiving due process.

So the border agent cannot defend the country from these persons and send them back? Maybe he is defending my life because those people may shoot me? So we DO give the police some wiggle room. Correct?

#1) But True
#2) I never said that. I said my parents wanted me to marry someone Jewish. I didn't for the record. But nice try.
#3) We established that we are not waving it but we are giving border agents more authority.

When I say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what due process it, this is what I mean. The border patrol agent does defend the country by arresting suspected illegal immigrants. He doesn't get to act as judge.

1) I'm pretty sure the whole "who is a better athlete" thing was started by you.
2) You said "even the least racist people want their kids to marry someone of the same race."
3) Due process is binary. It's either there or it isn't.

Wooooooow....no no no you guys don't want them arrested because then in your words "they make toddlers cry". I am all for allowing arrests but you don't want that. If you agree to arrests I am fine with that. 100%.

#1) Nope. I said from my personal experience, African Americans toast me in sports. You said you would too.
#2) Yes. But I never said that about me. I don't care who they marry so long as they aren't Yankees or Jets fans. Actually they have to be taller than them too. Sorry, a father's right. Oh and they can't be liberals. :)
#3) Only the Sith deal in absolutes.

What? I'm fine with arresting illegal immigrants. I'm not ok with detaining families beyond the arrest because the crime they were arrested for is a misdemeanor. Cite people with children and release them pending trial.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:38:00 AM (view original):
I'll use capital letters.

IF A PERP SHOOTS AT A POLICE OFFICER AND THE OFFICER SHOOTS BACK AND KILLS HIM, IS THAT DUE PROCESS?

To answer your questions:

#1) I am tougher than you because I can gauge by your rhetoric that you are fairly weak minded. Fact that you laud your athletic skills aka Al Bundy, I played high school football is laughable.

#2) I am a better parent because I don't teach my kids drivel such as white privilege and institutional racism. I teach them to treat each person and situation on an individual basis and don't ever bring home a freaking Yankees fan.

#3) I believe we need changes on the border. You don't. But then you complain about how the illegals are treated. Is that not the definition of "idiot"? I never said my suggestions were not radical. I said they were logical.

You are like the ACLU. You would rather live to the letter of the law and see a million people die than use logic and save them.

No, that's self defense. The police officer has a right to defend his own life, he isn't administratively waiving due process.

1) Weird.
2) Like how you hope they marry someone of the same race?
3) Wanting changes at the border doesn't require waiving due process.

So the border agent cannot defend the country from these persons and send them back? Maybe he is defending my life because those people may shoot me? So we DO give the police some wiggle room. Correct?

#1) But True
#2) I never said that. I said my parents wanted me to marry someone Jewish. I didn't for the record. But nice try.
#3) We established that we are not waving it but we are giving border agents more authority.

When I say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what due process it, this is what I mean. The border patrol agent does defend the country by arresting suspected illegal immigrants. He doesn't get to act as judge.

1) I'm pretty sure the whole "who is a better athlete" thing was started by you.
2) You said "even the least racist people want their kids to marry someone of the same race."
3) Due process is binary. It's either there or it isn't.

Wooooooow....no no no you guys don't want them arrested because then in your words "they make toddlers cry". I am all for allowing arrests but you don't want that. If you agree to arrests I am fine with that. 100%.

#1) Nope. I said from my personal experience, African Americans toast me in sports. You said you would too.
#2) Yes. But I never said that about me. I don't care who they marry so long as they aren't Yankees or Jets fans. Actually they have to be taller than them too. Sorry, a father's right. Oh and they can't be liberals. :)
#3) Only the Sith deal in absolutes.

What? I'm fine with arresting illegal immigrants. I'm not ok with detaining families beyond the arrest because the crime they were arrested for is a misdemeanor. Cite people with children and release them pending trial.

Wait. Whaaaat?

REWIND

If you allow arrests at the border then kids will be separated from the parents. You cried afoul. I said OK keep em together but deport them immediately if caught red handed. You cried afoul because that is not allowing them due process. So which is it?

Do they stay together and get sent back or stay here waiting for their trial, aka due process but get separated?

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 12:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 12:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 12:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:49:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 11:42:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:38:00 AM (view original):
I'll use capital letters.

IF A PERP SHOOTS AT A POLICE OFFICER AND THE OFFICER SHOOTS BACK AND KILLS HIM, IS THAT DUE PROCESS?

To answer your questions:

#1) I am tougher than you because I can gauge by your rhetoric that you are fairly weak minded. Fact that you laud your athletic skills aka Al Bundy, I played high school football is laughable.

#2) I am a better parent because I don't teach my kids drivel such as white privilege and institutional racism. I teach them to treat each person and situation on an individual basis and don't ever bring home a freaking Yankees fan.

#3) I believe we need changes on the border. You don't. But then you complain about how the illegals are treated. Is that not the definition of "idiot"? I never said my suggestions were not radical. I said they were logical.

You are like the ACLU. You would rather live to the letter of the law and see a million people die than use logic and save them.

No, that's self defense. The police officer has a right to defend his own life, he isn't administratively waiving due process.

1) Weird.
2) Like how you hope they marry someone of the same race?
3) Wanting changes at the border doesn't require waiving due process.

So the border agent cannot defend the country from these persons and send them back? Maybe he is defending my life because those people may shoot me? So we DO give the police some wiggle room. Correct?

#1) But True
#2) I never said that. I said my parents wanted me to marry someone Jewish. I didn't for the record. But nice try.
#3) We established that we are not waving it but we are giving border agents more authority.

When I say you have a fundamental misunderstanding of what due process it, this is what I mean. The border patrol agent does defend the country by arresting suspected illegal immigrants. He doesn't get to act as judge.

1) I'm pretty sure the whole "who is a better athlete" thing was started by you.
2) You said "even the least racist people want their kids to marry someone of the same race."
3) Due process is binary. It's either there or it isn't.

Wooooooow....no no no you guys don't want them arrested because then in your words "they make toddlers cry". I am all for allowing arrests but you don't want that. If you agree to arrests I am fine with that. 100%.

#1) Nope. I said from my personal experience, African Americans toast me in sports. You said you would too.
#2) Yes. But I never said that about me. I don't care who they marry so long as they aren't Yankees or Jets fans. Actually they have to be taller than them too. Sorry, a father's right. Oh and they can't be liberals. :)
#3) Only the Sith deal in absolutes.

What? I'm fine with arresting illegal immigrants. I'm not ok with detaining families beyond the arrest because the crime they were arrested for is a misdemeanor. Cite people with children and release them pending trial.

Wait. Whaaaat?

REWIND

If you allow arrests at the border then kids will be separated from the parents. You cried afoul. I said OK keep em together but deport them immediately if caught red handed. You cried afoul because that is not allowing them due process. So which is it?

Do they stay together and get sent back or stay here waiting for their trial, aka due process but get separated?

Families can be arrested, cited for the misdemeanor, and released pending trial. It's not that complicated.

The arrest itself doesn't require separation. It's the detention that requires separation.

Released where? To whom?

If they are arrested on June 1st and the trial is scheduled for June 15th, where do they stay for those two weeks?

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 12:11:00 PM (view original):
The arrest itself doesn't require separation. It's the detention that requires separation.

Correct

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 12:12:00 PM (view original):
Released where? To whom?

If they are arrested on June 1st and the trial is scheduled for June 15th, where do they stay for those two weeks?

Wherever they want. Wherever they were going to go before they were arrested.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/26/2018 12:03:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:47:00 AM (view original):
CCCP, if due process goes, what stops the government from arresting you, me, or anyone else without trial?

Strawman. I said give agents more authority at the border only. I never said eliminate due process and certainly not for people here legally. LOL. Listen to the podcast and then talk to me.

When someone is arrested by a border patrol agent, is the person in custody a suspect?

cccp?

"In theory that is great but just not practical. Who pays for this?"

So Boris. I like you. I suspect you're a really decent guy.

But your (above) comment in regard to "due process" is beyond nuts.
It's downright subversive anti-American garbage.

The fact that a so-called Citizen of our Great Country could be so Constitutionally intellectual challenged is definitely the largest problem our Country faces. THAT being the horrendous IGNORANCE of our people.

The Constitution of this Country is WAY WAY more than just a "theory"!
It is our WAY of life........... OUR LAWS!!

AS someone else said earlier............ IF YOU or any of you other loud mouth ignoramas don't want to abide the Constitution, then (PLEASE) emigrate ANYWHERE else on Earth of your choosing. Without "due process" you may as well live in Russia........... or (better yet) Saudi Arabia.
THAT's what living without due process looks like!!

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:58:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:52:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:45:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:16:00 AM (view original):
Wow. CCCP has gone insane. It's funny how he disregards me for wanting to change the electoral college, but now he argues against due process, a basic right in the constitution. Bonkers.

False equivalency yet again. Thanks for playing. When a perp shoots a police officer and he shoots back, is that due process? Y or N?

Answer. Because bad luck refuses to.

I'll give you some sage advice. You want to be a reporter. Listen to the Sunday podcast of Ben Shapiro and Jason Whitlock and let me know your thoughts.

How is that false equivalency? Both due process and the electoral college are core elements of our republic. To answer your question, no, that is not due process, that is a strawman.

To correct you, I AM a reporter, but I still like hearing differing perspectives. Give me a link to the podcast. IDK what Jason Whitlock has to do with it.

I just wish you would balance out Shapiro with something else in your ear. You are far too one sided and naive on this issue.

#1) False equivalency because I don't want to eliminate due process. I want to give the border patrol more rights to implement it. Sort of how a police officer shoots back at a perp when they try to shoot you. They don't ask for permission they make a call.

#2) https://www.iheart.com/podcast/404-The-Ben-Shapiro-Show-28178102/episode/sunday-special-ep-7-jason-whitlock-29505607/

#3) I listen to ALL perspectives. I actually disagree with Ben on two major points. a) Gun Control b) His Pro Life thinking.

My point is if an illegal is caught red handed crossing the border then they should be sent back immediately.

It is a radical change but the current deterrents are not working. I am happy to hear your thoughts on what changes you would make if any. To me its pretty obvious that currently this is a costly nightmare.

#1) Specifically what rights?

#2) OK I will take a listen at some point this week. I have a long car drive in 2 days so I will probably do it there.

#3) Yeah but on most other ones you defer to Ben even when you acknowledge that his viewpoint is extremely biased.

I don't see what good that brings. BL and I could list tons of bad things that would happen if your plan was implemented. What does 'caught red handed' mean to you?

I agree with BL. Eliminating DP isn't a deterrent. I don't know a ton about the situation (neither do you) so I don't have all the answers. One thing we could consider is monitoring VISAs to guard against overstays. I disagree that a wall is the answer, although I am not as vehemently against it as others are. I don't think we have to change the constitution or be needlessly cruel to solve the problem.

#1) If they see people crossing aka caught red handed they can send them back and document via video. That is all.

#2) Great. Its an hour and goes by quickly. You will enjoy it I think.

#3) Thats because we share those views. I admit I am biased. I don't hide it.

Whats wrong with the wall then? Mex is certainly not helping in keeping the situation in check.

#1) I disagree that they should be allowed to do that.

#3) On the Iran deal? When you heard what BS said, you completely flipped your opinion.

It is a waste of time, resources, and money IMO. Many better alternatives that are cheaper and stop more illegal immigration.

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/26/2018 11:59:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 6/26/2018 11:56:00 AM (view original):
BTW, the 'defending from someone potentially shooting you' isn't an argument against illegal immigration, it's an argument against everyone. Maybe we should deport Bracco, he could potentially shoot you, CCCP! Maybe we should deport all3! He could potentially cause danger to some of us!

They are citizens and have citizens rights. People who come here illegally do not. Stepping foot on our soil illegally should not give them equal rights to people who are here legally. In my opinion.

The constitution disagrees. Sorry.