trying to take a stand on settlements and possible money to be used for reprisals is a political position not in any way whatsoever tantamount to antisemitism........i think it is not a good idea to equate a good faith political stands as anti-jewish.....it waters down true antisemitism.........money for violent settlers was the reason for the circumspection.

cccp = circumcised citizens & concerned people...cccp

Ha ha

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 2:37:00 PM (view original):
UN law? The US is the $$ and power behind the UN. If we are going by UN law then there is no Israel. Are you part of the BDS movement?

Lol. If there is no UN law then Israel would not exist. And just because we help the UN doesn't mean that our needs outweigh everyone elses.

No, I am not.

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 12:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 10:32:00 AM (view original):
Within weeks of President Obama’s inauguration, IRS and State Department officials began considering whether they could deny or revoke tax-exempt status for organizations that provided material support to Jews living across the Green Line—the nonborder that delineates pre-1967 Israel from the territories Israel acquired in the Six Day War. The theory was that a Jewish presence in those areas is inconsistent with U.S. policy. The IRS drew up lists of such organizations based on information from anti-Israel websites such as Electronic Intifada and MondoWeiss.


While no formal policy was released barring U.S. tax-exempt entities from supporting Jewish activity over the Green Line, Obama IRS officials tried three times between 2009 and 2012 to create such a policy, and IRS employees made sure the effort wasn’t documented. One emailed her supervisor saying that she would answer his questions about IRS policy relating to Israeli settlements only orally. “Not doing email on this,” she explained.

1. Nothing to do with Obama
2. Makes perfect sense. Why would those companies get tax-exempt status for breaking UN law?

So it was a coincidence?

Yup. Not everything that happens under the president is a direct result of the president.

that too.

i hope they trick trump into eating dog.

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 3:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 12:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 10:32:00 AM (view original):
Within weeks of President Obama’s inauguration, IRS and State Department officials began considering whether they could deny or revoke tax-exempt status for organizations that provided material support to Jews living across the Green Line—the nonborder that delineates pre-1967 Israel from the territories Israel acquired in the Six Day War. The theory was that a Jewish presence in those areas is inconsistent with U.S. policy. The IRS drew up lists of such organizations based on information from anti-Israel websites such as Electronic Intifada and MondoWeiss.


While no formal policy was released barring U.S. tax-exempt entities from supporting Jewish activity over the Green Line, Obama IRS officials tried three times between 2009 and 2012 to create such a policy, and IRS employees made sure the effort wasn’t documented. One emailed her supervisor saying that she would answer his questions about IRS policy relating to Israeli settlements only orally. “Not doing email on this,” she explained.

1. Nothing to do with Obama
2. Makes perfect sense. Why would those companies get tax-exempt status for breaking UN law?

So it was a coincidence?

Yup. Not everything that happens under the president is a direct result of the president.

Man. I don't know what you do for work but I hope its not law enforcement. It would be unsolved crime central.

russia a couple of days ago poisoned a russian spy who had flipped to mi6.......they poisoned his daughter also and thats important.
steele went underground for about 3 months after buzzfeed.......fake dossier ?
i think manafort will only flip if he can go into witness protection.

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):
You are allowed to have the opinion that Obama is antisemitic. Just don't go calling others antisemitic and terrible because they disagree. Also, you can be up to scrutiny because your logic is clearly faulted.

He can be of the opinion that Obama is anti-Semitic. He can also have the opinion that anyone who doesn't agree with him is anti-Semitic. Doesn't make either opinion correct.

An opinion cant be wrong

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 5:09:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 3:41:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 12:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 10:32:00 AM (view original):
Within weeks of President Obama’s inauguration, IRS and State Department officials began considering whether they could deny or revoke tax-exempt status for organizations that provided material support to Jews living across the Green Line—the nonborder that delineates pre-1967 Israel from the territories Israel acquired in the Six Day War. The theory was that a Jewish presence in those areas is inconsistent with U.S. policy. The IRS drew up lists of such organizations based on information from anti-Israel websites such as Electronic Intifada and MondoWeiss.


While no formal policy was released barring U.S. tax-exempt entities from supporting Jewish activity over the Green Line, Obama IRS officials tried three times between 2009 and 2012 to create such a policy, and IRS employees made sure the effort wasn’t documented. One emailed her supervisor saying that she would answer his questions about IRS policy relating to Israeli settlements only orally. “Not doing email on this,” she explained.

1. Nothing to do with Obama
2. Makes perfect sense. Why would those companies get tax-exempt status for breaking UN law?

So it was a coincidence?

Yup. Not everything that happens under the president is a direct result of the president.

Man. I don't know what you do for work but I hope its not law enforcement. It would be unsolved crime central.

Innocent until proven guilty. Nothing in that article showed that Obama was involved in any way. Did the FBI look into this? Did anyone?

And I already told you. Journalist, specifically in athletics.

Posted by wylie715 on 3/9/2018 6:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 3/9/2018 12:23:00 PM (view original):
You are allowed to have the opinion that Obama is antisemitic. Just don't go calling others antisemitic and terrible because they disagree. Also, you can be up to scrutiny because your logic is clearly faulted.

He can be of the opinion that Obama is anti-Semitic. He can also have the opinion that anyone who doesn't agree with him is anti-Semitic. Doesn't make either opinion correct.

He is allowed to have that opinion, but my opinion is that his opinion is something that he shouldn't have, because it won't help him. Got it?

Posted by dino27 on 3/9/2018 3:32:00 PM (view original):
trying to take a stand on settlements and possible money to be used for reprisals is a political position not in any way whatsoever tantamount to antisemitism........i think it is not a good idea to equate a good faith political stands as anti-jewish.....it waters down true antisemitism.........money for violent settlers was the reason for the circumspection.

even before obama took office bush was getting frustrated over new settlements and violent settlers...it was a political issue as at that time the us was trying to be good faith broker.
it was a political issue about settlers.

Posted by cccp1014 on 3/9/2018 7:38:00 PM (view original):
An opinion cant be wrong

did I say either opinion was wrong? An opinion can't be right, either.