Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

You take the one thing he did, not the intention. The point was that he tried to **** a married woman, and admitted to kissing and he 'don't even wait'. That is sexual harrassment. SHE. WAS. MARRIED. It also gives credibility to the other accusations against Trump.

Kissing a woman without consent is harrassment.

My point was you draw yourself into a corner to talk about 'explicit proof' with Franken but not with Trump.

Hitting on a married women is NOT sexual harassment, even if the intention is to get laid. Not even close. Trump took this married woman shopping for high end furniture (she went willingly, correct? Why do you think that was?) and when it didn't end up with sex he admits he gave up on it rather than force the issue.

You're suggesting that every woman who leaves her husband for another man was sexually harassed?

As for your next paragraph... When did Trump admit he kissed anyone, specifically? With no proof of any individuals Trump could be simply embellishing... You would agree Trump embellishes pretty much everything, right?

No, I am not. But trying to go in hard on a married woman when you are married is pretty scandalous.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

That's literally saying that he kisses woman without consent. You know, the thing that lots of women have accused him of?

Did he kiss her?

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Thats because the Dems are the good guys.

If they are so "good", why are so many being busted for sexual harassment? I'm not just talking politics.

Also, I will never consider anyone who condones slaughtering unborn children a good guy. All pro-abortion people are scum to me.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

You take the one thing he did, not the intention. The point was that he tried to **** a married woman, and admitted to kissing and he 'don't even wait'. That is sexual harrassment. SHE. WAS. MARRIED. It also gives credibility to the other accusations against Trump.

Kissing a woman without consent is harrassment.

My point was you draw yourself into a corner to talk about 'explicit proof' with Franken but not with Trump.

Hitting on a married women is NOT sexual harassment, even if the intention is to get laid. Not even close. Trump took this married woman shopping for high end furniture (she went willingly, correct? Why do you think that was?) and when it didn't end up with sex he admits he gave up on it rather than force the issue.

You're suggesting that every woman who leaves her husband for another man was sexually harassed?

As for your next paragraph... When did Trump admit he kissed anyone, specifically? With no proof of any individuals Trump could be simply embellishing... You would agree Trump embellishes pretty much everything, right?

No, I am not. But trying to go in hard on a married woman when you are married is pretty scandalous.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

That's literally saying that he kisses woman without consent. You know, the thing that lots of women have accused him of?

Scandalous is not necessarily sexual harassment... And it sounds to me like he's joking. Thus the tic tac line and the 'you know' line. Only 2 women have sued Trump for sexual harassment in some 50+ years.... One withdrew her lawsuit citing lack of evidence. The other is pending, and he's not guilty until proven so.

All right wing fascists are scum to me. Guess where you fall strikeout? What a stupid piece of crap!

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:38:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

You take the one thing he did, not the intention. The point was that he tried to **** a married woman, and admitted to kissing and he 'don't even wait'. That is sexual harrassment. SHE. WAS. MARRIED. It also gives credibility to the other accusations against Trump.

Kissing a woman without consent is harrassment.

My point was you draw yourself into a corner to talk about 'explicit proof' with Franken but not with Trump.

Hitting on a married women is NOT sexual harassment, even if the intention is to get laid. Not even close. Trump took this married woman shopping for high end furniture (she went willingly, correct? Why do you think that was?) and when it didn't end up with sex he admits he gave up on it rather than force the issue.

You're suggesting that every woman who leaves her husband for another man was sexually harassed?

As for your next paragraph... When did Trump admit he kissed anyone, specifically? With no proof of any individuals Trump could be simply embellishing... You would agree Trump embellishes pretty much everything, right?

No, I am not. But trying to go in hard on a married woman when you are married is pretty scandalous.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.

That's literally saying that he kisses woman without consent. You know, the thing that lots of women have accused him of?

Scandalous is not necessarily sexual harassment... And it sounds to me like he's joking. Thus the tic tac line and the 'you know' line. Only 2 women have sued Trump for sexual harassment in some 50+ years.... One withdrew her lawsuit citing lack of evidence. The other is pending, and he's not guilty until proven so.

I don't think he is joking.

This, along with the list of people who have accused him (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/trump-sexual-assault-allegations-claims-women-how-many-groping-accused-us-president-a8091581.html)

And everything else he said.

And Billy Bush.

Shows that he was not joking.

BUT REMEMBER IT WAS NOT EVEN HIM IN THE TAPE OHOHOHOHOH

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Thats because the Dems are the good guys.

If they are so "good", why are so many being busted for sexual harassment? I'm not just talking politics.

Also, I will never consider anyone who condones slaughtering unborn children a good guy. All pro-abortion people are scum to me.

'slaughtering unborn children' pah. I like to think of it as using powers of American and economic freedom!

I agree that people who do abortion are morally questionable, but then again we are, I assume, white men discussing this so it would be best not to.

I truly do think Dems have turned a corner, they will remove anyone accused of harrassment by multiple people.

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2017 2:41:00 PM (view original):
AND poor little Nancy Odell (my spell) never said Donald Trump tried to **** her.

This beautiful looking woman has a life.

She has long ago found her life mate and continues to enjoy American lifestyle.

There are no pictures or FAKE yearbooks.

She simply heard the tape and was dismayed.

Because trump said he tried to **** her and never got the opportunity to.

It's trump's voice.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 3:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Thats because the Dems are the good guys.

If they are so "good", why are so many being busted for sexual harassment? I'm not just talking politics.

Also, I will never consider anyone who condones slaughtering unborn children a good guy. All pro-abortion people are scum to me.

'slaughtering unborn children' pah. I like to think of it as using powers of American and economic freedom!

I agree that people who do abortion are morally questionable, but then again we are, I assume, white men discussing this so it would be best not to.

I truly do think Dems have turned a corner, they will remove anyone accused of harrassment by multiple people.

I have and will always have zero respect for anyone who condones these travesties. It is legal murder. It is not "questionably moral." It is immoral and disgusting.

And abortion is not an "American Freedom" despite what some perverted judges said. Freedom in America guarantees the right to life.

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 3:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 3:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Thats because the Dems are the good guys.

If they are so "good", why are so many being busted for sexual harassment? I'm not just talking politics.

Also, I will never consider anyone who condones slaughtering unborn children a good guy. All pro-abortion people are scum to me.

'slaughtering unborn children' pah. I like to think of it as using powers of American and economic freedom!

I agree that people who do abortion are morally questionable, but then again we are, I assume, white men discussing this so it would be best not to.

I truly do think Dems have turned a corner, they will remove anyone accused of harrassment by multiple people.

I have and will always have zero respect for anyone who condones these travesties. It is legal murder. It is not "questionably moral." It is immoral and disgusting.

What if the woman is gonna die if she has the baby?

What if she has been raped?

What if she is a teen who is not ready to financially handle a baby?

I am in the middle on this. Allow first trimester abortion and that is it.

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 3:22:00 PM (view original):
And abortion is not an "American Freedom" despite what some perverted judges said. Freedom in America guarantees the right to life.

OK, here is my problem with that ideology. In my mind, making abortion illegal perpetuates the idea that women's only job is to have a kid. If a woman does not have a kid, they are taking away a baby's life, right? So let's force all women to have a baby, and if they don't, then they get put to jail.

Abortion is murder.

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2017 3:36:00 PM (view original):
Abortion is murder.

you are murder

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 3:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2017 3:36:00 PM (view original):
Abortion is murder.

you are murder

I am not a gun owner.

I am not a doctor.

I am not a politician.

I am not a preacher.

I am not your neighbor.

I am not your daddy.

I am not pregnant.

I did not impregnate you.

I will not pay for your mistakes.

I will not murder for your comfort.

I will not submit to your will.

I will not work with you until you get to work.

So get up and work with me. Or don't. Nothing changes.

Abortion is murder.