Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Took 2 years to get Nixon.

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

NOTICE how he never mentions her capability as a leader or her policy.

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

You think Trump lies less frequently than Hillary? And they are less severe?

Trump's ripping off of small businesses sits better with you? He's stiffed hundreds of private contractors and then ties them up in court. His charity was busted for self dealing, not the clinton's. Trump is fake charity.

You think Trump doesn't think he's above the rules? He's the one that said he could shoot someone on 5th avenue and get away with it.

Trump commenting on Franken...or really anyone, when he's had over a dozen allegations himself, isn't hypocrisy?

Trump was caught on tape saying he just grabs women by the *****. He kisses them without their permission. That's not vile enough for you?

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

This doesn't really make HRC a worse candidate than Trump since it can all be applied to Trump as well. They were and are both rotten candidates.

Posted by wylie715 on 11/18/2017 10:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

This doesn't really make HRC a worse candidate than Trump since it can all be applied to Trump as well. They were and are both rotten candidates.

They definitely both were bad candidates, but HRC was definitely the worse candidate of the two. She is proven to be a poor public official. Trump was and still is a wild card. I didn't follow her career at all as a senator as I was in the 9th grade when she was first elected and a senator across the country was of no interest to me, but her record as Secretary of State was very poor. Little was known about Trump's abilities in elected office. Economically, it appears that the right candidate was elected. It is still early, but we are on pace in Trump's first year to double Obama's best year in GDP growth. It's all speculatory whether there is a correlation between our renewed economic prosperity and Trump, but the one thing you can't argue are the stats. Reagan, great economy. Bush 1, average economy. Clinton, great economy (arguably better than Reagan's). Bush 2, atrocious economy. Obama, worst post recession economy in our country's history. Trump, on pace to match Reagan/Clinton economy.

Posted by strikeout26 on 11/18/2017 11:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 11/18/2017 10:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

This doesn't really make HRC a worse candidate than Trump since it can all be applied to Trump as well. They were and are both rotten candidates.

They definitely both were bad candidates, but HRC was definitely the worse candidate of the two. She is proven to be a poor public official. Trump was and still is a wild card. I didn't follow her career at all as a senator as I was in the 9th grade when she was first elected and a senator across the country was of no interest to me, but her record as Secretary of State was very poor. Little was known about Trump's abilities in elected office. Economically, it appears that the right candidate was elected. It is still early, but we are on pace in Trump's first year to double Obama's best year in GDP growth. It's all speculatory whether there is a correlation between our renewed economic prosperity and Trump, but the one thing you can't argue are the stats. Reagan, great economy. Bush 1, average economy. Clinton, great economy (arguably better than Reagan's). Bush 2, atrocious economy. Obama, worst post recession economy in our country's history. Trump, on pace to match Reagan/Clinton economy.

Thank you for a sensible, factual post. Sure you want to waste it here?
Seriously though, I, like millions upon millions of other Americans, voted against HRC and the status quo, at least as much as we voted for Trump.
I've got to admit I do love Trump's stance on illegal immigrants though. (They are NOT undocumented, they ARE illegal.)

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Getting rid of Trump will better this country.

Explain how

I think getting rid of people like you would make this country better. Please move. ASAP.

Many loud-mouth Liberal whiners, including at least one frequent poster on this site, promised they'd move to Canada if Trump won. The rest of us are still waiting. Unfortunately, I guess that was just more lying and broken promises.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/19/2017 11:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Getting rid of Trump will better this country.

Explain how

I think getting rid of people like you would make this country better. Please move. ASAP.

Boris. I'm afraid I've got to object here. You're better than this, aren't you? Your comment goes way over the line. Every citizen has a right to live FREELY here, and that extends to their right to express their opinions........... even IF their opinions might make you look, well..... less intelligent in comparison.

Posted by all3 on 11/19/2017 9:41:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 11/18/2017 11:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 11/18/2017 10:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

This doesn't really make HRC a worse candidate than Trump since it can all be applied to Trump as well. They were and are both rotten candidates.

They definitely both were bad candidates, but HRC was definitely the worse candidate of the two. She is proven to be a poor public official. Trump was and still is a wild card. I didn't follow her career at all as a senator as I was in the 9th grade when she was first elected and a senator across the country was of no interest to me, but her record as Secretary of State was very poor. Little was known about Trump's abilities in elected office. Economically, it appears that the right candidate was elected. It is still early, but we are on pace in Trump's first year to double Obama's best year in GDP growth. It's all speculatory whether there is a correlation between our renewed economic prosperity and Trump, but the one thing you can't argue are the stats. Reagan, great economy. Bush 1, average economy. Clinton, great economy (arguably better than Reagan's). Bush 2, atrocious economy. Obama, worst post recession economy in our country's history. Trump, on pace to match Reagan/Clinton economy.

Thank you for a sensible, factual post. Sure you want to waste it here?
Seriously though, I, like millions upon millions of other Americans, voted against HRC and the status quo, at least as much as we voted for Trump.
I've got to admit I do love Trump's stance on illegal immigrants though. (They are NOT undocumented, they ARE illegal.)

I think it is too early to judge Trump's impact on the economy. However, as I have said before I care more about foreign policy than internal affairs.

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/19/2017 11:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Getting rid of Trump will better this country.

Explain how

I think getting rid of people like you would make this country better. Please move. ASAP.

that is what most Trump supporters say. If you don't like it here, leave. My response would be "If you don't like it here, work to improve things."

Posted by tangplay on 11/19/2017 3:01:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/19/2017 9:41:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 11/18/2017 11:06:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 11/18/2017 10:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 6:52:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 6:08:00 PM (view original):
You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?

The lies - yes, all politicians do, but I believe her's are more frequent and more severe
The cheating - see DNC funds and rigged Democratic Primary
The thievery - just what did happen to all the Clinton Foundation money and how did the Clintons get their huge increase in wealth
The elitist attitude - far too many comments to list that show she feels she's above the rules that apply to everyone else
The hypocrisy - try to discredit Trump over events and comments far less severe than those of her own husband

How's that for starters?

This doesn't really make HRC a worse candidate than Trump since it can all be applied to Trump as well. They were and are both rotten candidates.

They definitely both were bad candidates, but HRC was definitely the worse candidate of the two. She is proven to be a poor public official. Trump was and still is a wild card. I didn't follow her career at all as a senator as I was in the 9th grade when she was first elected and a senator across the country was of no interest to me, but her record as Secretary of State was very poor. Little was known about Trump's abilities in elected office. Economically, it appears that the right candidate was elected. It is still early, but we are on pace in Trump's first year to double Obama's best year in GDP growth. It's all speculatory whether there is a correlation between our renewed economic prosperity and Trump, but the one thing you can't argue are the stats. Reagan, great economy. Bush 1, average economy. Clinton, great economy (arguably better than Reagan's). Bush 2, atrocious economy. Obama, worst post recession economy in our country's history. Trump, on pace to match Reagan/Clinton economy.

Thank you for a sensible, factual post. Sure you want to waste it here?
Seriously though, I, like millions upon millions of other Americans, voted against HRC and the status quo, at least as much as we voted for Trump.
I've got to admit I do love Trump's stance on illegal immigrants though. (They are NOT undocumented, they ARE illegal.)

I think it is too early to judge Trump's impact on the economy. However, as I have said before I care more about foreign policy than internal affairs.

It's definitely too early and I said in the original post there is no way to be certain that the growing economy is because of Trump. The credit could very easily go to Obama, but the reality is that the sitting president is going to take credit or blame. It has been like that for as long as I can remember. What makes it tough to give Obama any credit is that his record in years 5-8 was so poor. Like I said, it was mathematically the weakest post-recession economy our country has ever seen.

My problem with weighting foreign affairs over internal affairs is that if we're broke we have can have very little impact overseas. Also, clarify which aspect of foreign affairs you are referring to. You have said many times that the environment and foreign affairs are more important to you than economic issues. Environment is self explanatory, but "foreign affairs" is very broad. I'm just curious which aspect you're referring to.