Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

every senator has lied at some point. It comes with the territory. None of them should get a pass

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 4:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

The liberal press hasn't spent nearly as much time on HRC's situation as they have on Trump's admin regarding improprieties. ..

For instance, Brazile's statements regarding the shenanigans at the DNC got very little attention from most of the network news. Yet they continue to beat the Trump/Russia drum constantly, despite the lack of evidence of collusion involving The Donald...

I mean, obviously. First, Trump is president. Hillary is not. Second, yes, there is lots of evidence of collusion involving Trump.

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 7:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 4:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

The liberal press hasn't spent nearly as much time on HRC's situation as they have on Trump's admin regarding improprieties. ..

For instance, Brazile's statements regarding the shenanigans at the DNC got very little attention from most of the network news. Yet they continue to beat the Trump/Russia drum constantly, despite the lack of evidence of collusion involving The Donald...

I mean, obviously. First, Trump is president. Hillary is not. Second, yes, there is lots of evidence of collusion involving Trump.

Real, hard evidence? The kind that would stand-up in a court? Please tell us what that is.

Posted by all3 on 11/17/2017 7:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 7:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 4:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

The liberal press hasn't spent nearly as much time on HRC's situation as they have on Trump's admin regarding improprieties. ..

For instance, Brazile's statements regarding the shenanigans at the DNC got very little attention from most of the network news. Yet they continue to beat the Trump/Russia drum constantly, despite the lack of evidence of collusion involving The Donald...

I mean, obviously. First, Trump is president. Hillary is not. Second, yes, there is lots of evidence of collusion involving Trump.

Real, hard evidence? The kind that would stand-up in a court? Please tell us what that is.

Maybe if you would watch something other then the cartoon channel you would know the answer to that question

Yes, please inform those of us not capable of grasping the obvious...even Dem Sen. Dianne Feinstein, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has said there is none.

If you refer to those involved with Trump, then you could perhaps make a case. But evidence linking Trump, it hasn't materialized in more than a year of investigations.

Posted by DougOut on 11/17/2017 9:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 11/17/2017 7:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/17/2017 7:11:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 7:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 4:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

The liberal press hasn't spent nearly as much time on HRC's situation as they have on Trump's admin regarding improprieties. ..

For instance, Brazile's statements regarding the shenanigans at the DNC got very little attention from most of the network news. Yet they continue to beat the Trump/Russia drum constantly, despite the lack of evidence of collusion involving The Donald...

I mean, obviously. First, Trump is president. Hillary is not. Second, yes, there is lots of evidence of collusion involving Trump.

Real, hard evidence? The kind that would stand-up in a court? Please tell us what that is.

Maybe if you would watch something other then the cartoon channel you would know the answer to that question

We're waiting. BRACCO.

Hold your breath.........PLEASE! I will get back to you in a couple of years

I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Getting rid of Trump will better this country.

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Jailing Trump WOULD be making this a better country.

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 3:07:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/18/2017 2:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 11/18/2017 2:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/18/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
I mean, we don't have a 'smoking gun' on TRUMP himself, necessarily, but we do know that people in his campaign were linked and he and his family had the direct means to get info from Russia. So it's very likely that he colluded. Right now, he will not be convicted. Later? We will see.

So, the answer the question is, despite all the Libs / Dems doing all the digging they possibly can, into everything and anything they possibly can, they have NOTHING AT ALL linking Trump to any type of crime. Thanks for clearing that up for us.

Obstruction is a crime right? Trump admitted himself that he fired Comey because of the Russian investigation. Be patient padawan. It's coming.

Well, I will agree that there is a better chance of Trump being charged of something than there is of me ever being your student.

That doesn't change the fact that as of now, the answer is still NO. (Nor is anything remotely imminent.) Make all the "brilliant" forecasts you like, but none of those ever seem to work-out for people touting Trump's demise.

Maybe all that time, effort and money would be better spent on trying to better this Country.

Getting rid of Trump will better this country.

Maybe the Dems should make sure to offer a better option. HRC sure as h*ll wasn't a better option. Seems the Party has no idea what direction they are, or should be, headed, so I wouldn't count on it.

You really think she wasnt a better option? Why?