Posted by cccp1014 on 11/16/2017 2:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/16/2017 2:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/16/2017 8:10:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/15/2017 9:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/15/2017 9:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/15/2017 4:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/15/2017 8:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/14/2017 7:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 1:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 11:39:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 11:37:00 AM (view original):
He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

The only other realistic option was trump and...well...we all see how that's going. Clinton would have been a MUCH better choice.

Explain why

Explain what? That Trump's incompetent? Or corrupt? Or compromised?

It's very evident that Trump is 100% incapable of doing this job. He isn't smart or tough or a good negotiator. He isn't a good manager or decision maker. He's circus showman...a guy who can leverage emotions and use them to his advantage. That's it. That's the extent of his skill set.

That doesn't make a good president.

Clinton, on the other hand was bad at leveraging emotions. She wasn't terribly likable. But she was very capable and qualified for the job.

I mean how has your life become worse since Trump has been in office? Economy struggling? How has your life changed?

I have to deal with out in the open racists and bigots much more often now. They have become much more emboldened since the Trumpster's reign started. Hate crimes are up right along with the stock market.

I've been doing just fine since Obama took over and righted the ship. Financially nothing has changed since 2009. My 401k is looking PHAT and that's nothing new in just 2017. Definitely more robust than the **** Bush left me.

Racism was always there just because it was more closeted doesn't mean it wasn't there. That is an idiotic statement, which I expect coming from you. Obama artificially grew the stock market because the interest rates were so low for so long that institutions and pension funds had to invest somewhere but that was also why there was stagnation in wage growth. And increasing the minimum wage will never be the answer, actually that is a terrible idea.

Bush was a terrible president and I did not vote for him so we at least agree there. So your wages have not gone up since 2009?

I would agree. I am against raising the minimum wage.

LOL.

I'm also against raising the minimum wage much higher than to 10 bucks or so. Not even sure why that was brought into the conversation. I'd rather see more affordable housing built.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Define "affordable housing". Is it housing for a mother of two, unmarried, doesn't "work" but really works under the table. He boyfriend has a full time job. She drives a KIA SUV, he drives a mustang. They have cable TV, two smart phones a playstation and go to Disney annually but pay $100/month for rent because on paper she is "poor". I would like more oversight over families such as this to determine who really is or is not poor.

Define "needs a tax cut." Is it for a business owner who writes down his income with building depreciation and who pays employees by 1099 to avoid payroll taxes and workers compensation premium? He makes millions. His wife drives a Range Rover, he drives a Porsche. They have a yacht, two vacation homes, a butler, and go to the Bahamas annually but pay a lower rate in taxes than a lot of blue collar workers because on paper, their actual income is low. I would like more oversight over families such as this to determine who really does or does not need a tax cut.

I think that is 100% fair.

this may be a fair point but it is also ridiculous. cccp's example is of wide spread abuse going on in this country by the millions, while B L's example is of a 1 in a million occurrence now maybe if B L hadn't exaggerated his example so much his point would of been more relevant.

Posted by wylie715 on 11/16/2017 12:22:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/15/2017 9:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 11/15/2017 12:29:00 PM (view original):
Yes, racism has always been there, but our esteemed president has made it okay to show you are a racist, sexist buffoon, so it is more out in the open now.

I'd like to know who hates me rather than have them closeted.

we all hate you, dude

Cccp1014 is the biggest ******* on here.

Posted by rjj4191 on 11/16/2017 7:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/16/2017 2:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/16/2017 2:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/16/2017 8:10:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/15/2017 9:48:00 PM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/15/2017 9:44:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 11/15/2017 4:54:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/15/2017 8:50:00 AM (view original):

Posted by The Taint on 11/14/2017 7:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 2:56:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 1:58:00 PM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 1:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 11/14/2017 11:39:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 11/14/2017 11:37:00 AM (view original):
He voted for HRC....let those actions speak for themselves.

The only other realistic option was trump and...well...we all see how that's going. Clinton would have been a MUCH better choice.

Explain why

Explain what? That Trump's incompetent? Or corrupt? Or compromised?

It's very evident that Trump is 100% incapable of doing this job. He isn't smart or tough or a good negotiator. He isn't a good manager or decision maker. He's circus showman...a guy who can leverage emotions and use them to his advantage. That's it. That's the extent of his skill set.

That doesn't make a good president.

Clinton, on the other hand was bad at leveraging emotions. She wasn't terribly likable. But she was very capable and qualified for the job.

I mean how has your life become worse since Trump has been in office? Economy struggling? How has your life changed?

I have to deal with out in the open racists and bigots much more often now. They have become much more emboldened since the Trumpster's reign started. Hate crimes are up right along with the stock market.

I've been doing just fine since Obama took over and righted the ship. Financially nothing has changed since 2009. My 401k is looking PHAT and that's nothing new in just 2017. Definitely more robust than the **** Bush left me.

Racism was always there just because it was more closeted doesn't mean it wasn't there. That is an idiotic statement, which I expect coming from you. Obama artificially grew the stock market because the interest rates were so low for so long that institutions and pension funds had to invest somewhere but that was also why there was stagnation in wage growth. And increasing the minimum wage will never be the answer, actually that is a terrible idea.

Bush was a terrible president and I did not vote for him so we at least agree there. So your wages have not gone up since 2009?

I would agree. I am against raising the minimum wage.

LOL.

I'm also against raising the minimum wage much higher than to 10 bucks or so. Not even sure why that was brought into the conversation. I'd rather see more affordable housing built.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Define "affordable housing". Is it housing for a mother of two, unmarried, doesn't "work" but really works under the table. He boyfriend has a full time job. She drives a KIA SUV, he drives a mustang. They have cable TV, two smart phones a playstation and go to Disney annually but pay $100/month for rent because on paper she is "poor". I would like more oversight over families such as this to determine who really is or is not poor.

Define "needs a tax cut." Is it for a business owner who writes down his income with building depreciation and who pays employees by 1099 to avoid payroll taxes and workers compensation premium? He makes millions. His wife drives a Range Rover, he drives a Porsche. They have a yacht, two vacation homes, a butler, and go to the Bahamas annually but pay a lower rate in taxes than a lot of blue collar workers because on paper, their actual income is low. I would like more oversight over families such as this to determine who really does or does not need a tax cut.

I think that is 100% fair.

this may be a fair point but it is also ridiculous. cccp's example is of wide spread abuse going on in this country by the millions, while B L's example is of a 1 in a million occurrence now maybe if B L hadn't exaggerated his example so much his point would of been more relevant.

lol. you are delusional sir

Keep dodging, Taint. You do that best. You and bad_luck. When you lose a debate you just move on.

Posted by The Taint on 11/16/2017 2:30:00 PM (view original):

Posted by holdaway on 11/15/2017 10:03:00 PM (view original):
What exactly were HRC qualifications?

For president?

Well, she was able to convince the DNC to commit crimes against it's own candidates and contributors. She also was able to commit treason and avoid jail. Those things have to qualify her for something, right?

Yea, and she ate all her other chillen except that one with the kinky hair (probably something in the woodpile there, right?), and she's actually nocturnal and flies around after dark sucking blood out of the necks of goofy repugnican marshmellows who believe in weirder still conspiracy theories headed up by an old, old, tired woman! Rock on patriot.......... or should I say Parrot.

Posted by laramiebob on 11/17/2017 10:59:00 AM (view original):
Yea, and she ate all her other chillen except that one with the kinky hair (probably something in the woodpile there, right?), and she's actually nocturnal and flies around after dark sucking blood out of the necks of goofy repugnican marshmellows who believe in weirder still conspiracy theories headed up by an old, old, tired woman! Rock on patriot.......... or should I say Parrot.

I know that when the Clintons left the WH they were not millionaires then suddenly post the Clinton Foundation they are worth over $100MM. Your aforementioned kinky haired daughter was taking a huge salary and now the foundation is closing? Their donors were pay for play entities. I don't really care all that much as this is done many times over by other so called charities but she is a hypocrite that everyone can agree on.

She also called women sheep. Pretty tough to get the female vote that way.

Please, I'm no apologist for HRC. Can't stomach her or her husband.......... but I just get tired of all the conspiracy garbage and ranting about Shrillary when it's all behind us now......... or should be. We have bigger concerns......... like whether, or not, the doofus in the WH is actually in "bed" with the Russian government who have the "goods" on him and could blackmail him at any time. Seems to me we should focus on the present not fishy odors emanating from dead political mackarals most folks would like to ignore.

There is more Russia contact with HRC than with DJT. Come on now. I think his ego is too big for him to be blackmailable. Is that a word?

who cares about Hilary? She is not the POTUS. Trump is.

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

Posted by wylie715 on 11/17/2017 1:36:00 PM (view original):
who cares about Hilary? She is not the POTUS. Trump is.

Many people fail to understand that. Especially those living in Cali...:)

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

As far as Franken is concerned, if he was just joking around on a radio show, let him apologize and move on. If he actually groped her, that's a different deal entirely. For those guilty, let them have what's coming. For those wrongfully accused, and there are some, the accusers should be punished. Especially in Washington, there are those that would concoct a story to smear someone. Unfortunately it is a difficult thing to know who is and who is not guilty.

Posted by tangplay on 11/17/2017 3:40:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DoctorKz on 11/17/2017 2:02:00 PM (view original):
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/cortneyobrien/2017/11/17/wapo-catches-senate-dems-lying-again-n2410383

As far as Felonia Von Pantsuit, the argument that why is it important to investigate potential wrongdoing? Because if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck...

She is not above the law. If found innocent, so be it. You can't investigate Trump's inner circle, yet give Dems a pass...

No one is giving Dems a pass.

The liberal press hasn't spent nearly as much time on HRC's situation as they have on Trump's admin regarding improprieties. ..

For instance, Brazile's statements regarding the shenanigans at the DNC got very little attention from most of the network news. Yet they continue to beat the Trump/Russia drum constantly, despite the lack of evidence of collusion involving The Donald...