I don't remember anything from when I was 4. Doesn't mean that I didn't have rights. I would expect a more intelligent argument out you, tang.

And who are you to say it's okay to murder innocent children.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 8:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 8:34:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 8:31:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 8:29:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 8:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 8:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 8:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jmcraven74 on 10/10/2017 7:10:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 7:04:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 10/10/2017 5:35:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 3:01:00 PM (view original):
The left has lost any semblance of a moral compass. Hate religion, kill babies, enslave the indigent.

Hold on... what? We don't hate religion, we only support abortion in special cases, and it is the right who hates the poor.

What's with the "we?"

I support abortion in almost any case when the woman wants to have an abortion. It's her body, she has the right to decide whether or not she has kids.

Should a mother be forced against her will to feed her one week old baby, or is she within her rights to walk off and let it starve? Maybe she wants to go out and protest the anthem instead of staying home and feeding the baby.

A one week old baby can be cared for by anyone. It doesn't require a host body to survive, it's a separate person.

Just because a baby in the womb requires a host body, doesn't make it any less human.

But it makes it not a separate person. The mom's rights supersede the fetus' rights.

According to our founding fathers, everyone has equal rights. Nobody's rights supersede another's. A fetus is a human. I have a sonogram to prove it.

If the fetus wants equal rights it has to be able to live outside the mom. Otherwise it's just a guest.

That's your opinion. God and the Declaration of Independence both disagree.

Well, no. It's the law. Abortion is legal.

Sadly, you are correct. Some left wing judges said that women have more rights than children. It's a travesty that millions of unborn children are murdered a year because of these losers.

Just because a form of murder was decided to be legal doesn't make it anymore right.

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 9:03:00 PM (view original):
Just because a form of murder was decided to be legal doesn't make it anymore right.

Murder is a legal term. Abortion isn't murder.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 9:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 9:03:00 PM (view original):
Just because a form of murder was decided to be legal doesn't make it anymore right.

Murder is a legal term. Abortion isn't murder.

Once again, technically you are right. Lets try again. Just because the slaying of innocent, beautiful children is legal doesn't make it right.

It's the correct option though. The reality is that the mom gets to decide if a fetus gets to live inside her.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 9:27:00 PM (view original):
It's the correct option though. The reality is that the mom gets to decide if a fetus gets to live inside her.

You keep saying this, but why do you believe it's right? I'm talking morally speaking, not legally. If a fetus has a heart beat, eats, and breathes, why is it okay to kill that child. I'm not being rhetorical. I am seriously curious. I hear all the time from the left that a woman has rights and a fetus doesn't, but why do you guys feel that way?

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 9:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 9:27:00 PM (view original):
It's the correct option though. The reality is that the mom gets to decide if a fetus gets to live inside her.

You keep saying this, but why do you believe it's right? I'm talking morally speaking, not legally. If a fetus has a heart beat, eats, and breathes, why is it okay to kill that child. I'm not being rhetorical. I am seriously curious. I hear all the time from the left that a woman has rights and a fetus doesn't, but why do you guys feel that way?

Because the fetus is living inside the mom. It's not ideal, but if she doesn't want to bear children, she has the right to end the pregnancy. It's her body.

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 9:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 10/10/2017 9:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 10/10/2017 9:27:00 PM (view original):
It's the correct option though. The reality is that the mom gets to decide if a fetus gets to live inside her.

You keep saying this, but why do you believe it's right? I'm talking morally speaking, not legally. If a fetus has a heart beat, eats, and breathes, why is it okay to kill that child. I'm not being rhetorical. I am seriously curious. I hear all the time from the left that a woman has rights and a fetus doesn't, but why do you guys feel that way?

Because the fetus is living inside the mom. It's not ideal, but if she doesn't want to bear children, she has the right to end the pregnancy. It's her body.

Do you consider the fetus to be alive?

Of course.

I guess it will never make sense to me. I look at my son and it brings me close to tears at the thought that someone could do that. They have the legal right to do it and I can't change that yet, so.

BL advocates for minorities yet he has no problem with over 400,000 minority fetus executions. African Americans and Hispanics make up 29% of the US population yet they account for a disproportionate amount of all abortions (55%).

BL also advocates for the poor... yet he stands by as 75% of all abortions are from women with low income or below the poverty line. I guess the good news for republicans is that's almost 700,000 fetus' that won't live long enough to collect a welfare check.

And moy is a troll.

Guys sometimes not committing abortion is suicide.