I see Moy is still a mindless idiot. You really think it's that simple buddy? Have another drink.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 8:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 4/20/2017 12:22:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/19/2017 11:58:00 PM (view original):
I never said you should riot if you don't like a law.

The ends justify the means buddy. You said it. Because businesses have insurance it's ok to riot in Ferguson. You supported BLM and the burn this ***** down movement. It is known.


Do you disagree with secretary Kelly's comment?

Sometimes the ends justify the means. But it wasn't a law being protested.

I still support BLM.

"Protested"?

That's a loose definition of the word.

What were they "protesting"?

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/20/2017 12:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 8:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 4/20/2017 12:22:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/19/2017 11:58:00 PM (view original):
I never said you should riot if you don't like a law.

The ends justify the means buddy. You said it. Because businesses have insurance it's ok to riot in Ferguson. You supported BLM and the burn this ***** down movement. It is known.


Do you disagree with secretary Kelly's comment?

Sometimes the ends justify the means. But it wasn't a law being protested.

I still support BLM.

"Protested"?

That's a loose definition of the word.

What were they "protesting"?

Well, to start, we should distinguish between people protesting and rioting out of genuine anger and frustration and people rioting and looting because they were taking advantage of an opportunity.

Rioting out of anger and frustration isn't a good option, but sometimes it's an understandable means to an end. They were not protesting a law, they were protesting unjust treatment by law enforcement.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 1:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/20/2017 12:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 8:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 4/20/2017 12:22:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/19/2017 11:58:00 PM (view original):
I never said you should riot if you don't like a law.

The ends justify the means buddy. You said it. Because businesses have insurance it's ok to riot in Ferguson. You supported BLM and the burn this ***** down movement. It is known.


Do you disagree with secretary Kelly's comment?

Sometimes the ends justify the means. But it wasn't a law being protested.

I still support BLM.

"Protested"?

That's a loose definition of the word.

What were they "protesting"?

Well, to start, we should distinguish between people protesting and rioting out of genuine anger and frustration and people rioting and looting because they were taking advantage of an opportunity.

Rioting out of anger and frustration isn't a good option, but sometimes it's an understandable means to an end. They were not protesting a law, they were protesting unjust treatment by law enforcement.

Weren't those accused of unjust treatment being investigated by the authorities as the LAW requires?

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/20/2017 1:25:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 1:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/20/2017 12:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/20/2017 8:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 4/20/2017 12:22:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/19/2017 11:58:00 PM (view original):
I never said you should riot if you don't like a law.

The ends justify the means buddy. You said it. Because businesses have insurance it's ok to riot in Ferguson. You supported BLM and the burn this ***** down movement. It is known.


Do you disagree with secretary Kelly's comment?

Sometimes the ends justify the means. But it wasn't a law being protested.

I still support BLM.

"Protested"?

That's a loose definition of the word.

What were they "protesting"?

Well, to start, we should distinguish between people protesting and rioting out of genuine anger and frustration and people rioting and looting because they were taking advantage of an opportunity.

Rioting out of anger and frustration isn't a good option, but sometimes it's an understandable means to an end. They were not protesting a law, they were protesting unjust treatment by law enforcement.

Weren't those accused of unjust treatment being investigated by the authorities as the LAW requires?

Ferguson was just the straw that broke the camel's back. It's not a secret that black people get a raw deal in the US justice system.

So you're not disagreeing with me?

BTW, did you know of those being investigated, it appears that only one is having trouble with exoneration?

I look at it this way:

The same cop pulls over two identical white hondas. The driver of car A is black and the driver of car B is white. Both drivers behave exactly the same way. If the cop is more afraid of the black driver and therefore more likely to shoot the black driver, that's a problem, even if the shooting is justified.

It's the unsolvable problem. The racism isn't explicit. The cop isn't a KKK member, that would be easy to deal with. It's subliminaly entrenched.

Do you think seeing hundreds/thousands of blacks "protesting" and screaming "Burn this mother down" perpetuates the problem?

No

Really? Seeing people of a certain race burning down businesses, trashing cop cars, looting, etc, etc, makes you feel more comfortable around that specific race?

Posted by MikeT23 on 4/20/2017 2:07:00 PM (view original):
Really? Seeing people of a certain race burning down businesses, trashing cop cars, looting, etc, etc, makes you feel more comfortable around that specific race?

It does not make me uncomfortable around that race. Does it make you uncomfortable?