Notice how Moy avoids the truth about his hero?

I love it when the cons have nothing to say!

Holocaust. Centers.

Posted by bad_luck on 4/11/2017 12:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/11/2017 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/11/2017 10:53:00 AM (view original):
Does it really matter what b_l replies? In two days he'll deny it, then try to twist things when proven wrong.

Does it really mater what Trump does? Moy will say its the best thing since sliced bread no matter what it is.

Not sure why all3 hangs around. I don't know him, never had more than a brief exchange with him, but he has a raging hard-on for me.

I do have a strange lure to your posts. It's kind of like a bad accident along the highway. You know something terrible has happened, yet you just "have to" look. You post so much truly stupid sheit (see MLB and other threads too), take so much abuse for it, then try to amend and/or retract it so frequently, that I just can't believe you continue. Morbid curiosity keeps me wondering what idiocy or denial you'll post next. Anything more you create in your twisted little mind really needs to stay in your twisted little mind. Now get back to entertaining us.

Posted by RCBracco on 4/11/2017 2:35:00 PM (view original):
I love it when the cons have nothing to say!

Why say anything, when nothing needs said? Events of the last few days make it pretty clear there is no Trump - Russia connection. Only the most extreme liberal jack@ss would still be beating that dead horse.

Posted by all3 on 4/11/2017 3:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/11/2017 12:33:00 PM (view original):

Posted by wylie715 on 4/11/2017 12:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 4/11/2017 10:53:00 AM (view original):
Does it really matter what b_l replies? In two days he'll deny it, then try to twist things when proven wrong.

Does it really mater what Trump does? Moy will say its the best thing since sliced bread no matter what it is.

Not sure why all3 hangs around. I don't know him, never had more than a brief exchange with him, but he has a raging hard-on for me.

I do have a strange lure to your posts. It's kind of like a bad accident along the highway. You know something terrible has happened, yet you just "have to" look. You post so much truly stupid sheit (see MLB and other threads too), take so much abuse for it, then try to amend and/or retract it so frequently, that I just can't believe you continue. Morbid curiosity keeps me wondering what idiocy or denial you'll post next. Anything more you create in your twisted little mind really needs to stay in your twisted little mind. Now get back to entertaining us.

Stay away from my drink, Cosby.

So your ok with the conflict of interest? Well of course you are. if you acknowledged it you would have to admit how stupid you were being coned by Pres *******

Posted by moy23 on 4/11/2017 4:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 4/11/2017 2:16:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 4/11/2017 1:55:00 PM (view original):
It's sure quiet on the Russia Trump collusion front, eh Liberals?

Is it? The FBI is still investigating. Other things being in the news doesn't magically make the investigation go away.

I see you are still dreaming. Bigly!

Ask and you shall receive

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/fbi-obtained-fisa-warrant-to-monitor-former-trump-adviser-carter-page/2017/04/11/620192ea-1e0e-11e7-ad74-3a742a6e93a7_story.html?utm_term=.87ea7a3ddfab

"The FBI and the Justice Department obtained the warrant targeting Carter Page’s communications after convincing a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court judge that there was probable cause to believe Page was acting as an agent of a foreign power, in this case Russia, according to the officials.

This is the clearest evidence so far that the FBI had reason to believe during the 2016 presidential campaign that a Trump campaign adviser was in touch with Russian agents. Such contacts are now at the center of an investigation into whether the campaign coordinated with the Russian government to swing the election in Trump’s favor."

Washington (CNN)After a review of the same intelligence reports brought to light by House Intelligence Chairman Devin Nunes, both Republican and Democratic lawmakers and aides have so far found no evidence that Obama administration officials did anything unusual or illegal, multiple sources in both parties tell CNN.

Their private assessment contradicts President Donald Trump's allegations that former Obama national security adviser Susan Rice broke the law by requesting the "unmasking" of US individuals' identities. Trump had claimed the matter was a "massive story."
However, over the last week, several members and staff of the House and Senate intelligence committees have reviewed intelligence reports related to those requests at NSA headquarters in Fort Meade, Maryland.

One congressional intelligence source described the requests made by Rice as "normal and appropriate" for officials who serve in that role to the president.
And another source said there's "absolutely" no smoking gun in the reports, urging the White House to declassify them to make clear there was nothing alarming in the documents.

CNN)A federal court judge ruled that a Texas voter ID law was passed with the intent to discriminate against minorities, violating the Voting Rights Act.

The state's voter ID law has been under legal challenge since it passed in 2011 and went into effect in 2013. The Texas law requires voters to present government-issued photo IDs such as a state driver's license, a Texas election identification certificate, a US passport or a military identification card.
Proponents of the law say requiring photo IDs before casting a vote prevents voter fraud.

Critics of the voter ID law say such requirements disenfranchise poor and minority voters, who face difficulties obtaining IDs. They also point out that while Texas accepts a license to carry a handgun as a permissible form of voter ID, it doesn't accept federal or state government IDs or a student ID.
"The terms of the bill were unduly strict," wrote Judge Nelva Gonzales Ramos for the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas. "Many categories of acceptable photo IDs permitted by other states were omitted from the Texas bill."
She also concluded in Monday's ruling that the law "had a discriminatory impact" and that there had been a "pattern of conduct unexplainable on grounds other than (the) race factor."

President Trump says he has created 600,000 jobs so far. It's a false statement.

"We've created over 600,000 jobs already over a very short period of time and it's going to really start catching on now," Trump said Tuesday at the White House, flanked by his top advisers and the CEOs who are members of his Business Advisory Council.

He repeated the statement later at a press conference: "Already we've created more than almost [sic] 600,000 jobs."


"more than almost 600,000 jobs" hahahahahaha. What the **** does that even mean?

Official government data does not back up that claim.

According to CNNMoney's Trump Jobs Tracker, 317,000 jobs have been created since Trump took office. The president is trying to take credit for nearly double that number of jobs.

The ultimate authority on how many jobs are created (or lost) each month is the US Labor Department. CNNMoney's 317,000 figure includes how many jobs the Labor Department reported were created in February (219,000) and March (98,000).

A White House spokesman said Trump is including all the job added in January as well (216,000). Trump was only in office for 11.5 days that month.

But even if you give him all of the gains for January, that still only brings the tally to 533,000 jobs created so far in 2017.

The math doesn't quite add up to 600,000.

Trump vs. Obama

The bottom line is: Yes, business and consumer optimism has picked up since Trump won the election. That is likely a factor in some hiring decisions by businesses. But the reality is the economy has added an average of 178,000 jobs a month so far this year. That's very close to, and even slightly lower than, the average last year (187,000 a month) when President Obama was in office.