I'm not arguing with you. You made a statement. I asked a question.

You're blaming 8 years of conditioning, conditioning of who/by who?

Yeah, I'm gonna pass today too. Maybe moy will argue with you.

Add it to the list of things mike says but can't back up.

And to the number of times Mike decided arguing with BL was more pointless than anything else he could possibly waste time doing.

Things can go on two lists at once.

MikeT doesn't like lists.

Posted by wylie715 on 3/21/2017 12:57:00 PM (view original):
I've noticed that when someone says something negative about Trump, his supporters always respond with, yeah, but so and so did this! For instance, when it became obvious Trump is a sexist pig with little respect for women, the response was Bill Clinton had sex with an intern!! When you say Trump is a liar, the response is "Hillary is a liar!!!" When you say Trump spends $3 million every time he goes to Florida and he goes every weekend, the response is "Obama played a lot of golf too!" Its never a defense of trump's actions, but a condemnation of someone else's actions. All the responses may (or may not)be true, but that doesn't mean its okay for Trump to do whatever the action in question is.

in short: Everyone is a hypocrite.

Posted by kermit on 3/21/2017 4:32:00 PM (view original):
MikeT doesn't like lists.

No, I don't makes lists. Except for Worst President of All-time. I list them.

How about BEST SS EVAH!!!!!!!! ?

That was not a list just a statement of fact.

Posted by kermit on 3/21/2017 4:50:00 PM (view original):
How about BEST SS EVAH!!!!!!!! ?

All about it

1 Wagner
2 Arod
3 Ripken
4 Vaughan
5 (Do we count Banks and Yount as shortstops?)
6 (If so, them at 5 & 6)
7 Smith
8 Appling
9 Jeter
10 Trammell
11 Larkin
12 Boudreau

(went 12 deep in case 5/6 are no)

None of those guys qualify for Worst President Ever. Do you even bother with the thread topic when you try to start an argument?

Posted by MikeT23 on 3/21/2017 5:05:00 PM (view original):
None of those guys qualify for Worst President Ever. Do you even bother with the thread topic when you try to start an argument?

No one would argue with that list.

Posted by bad_luck on 3/21/2017 2:19:00 PM (view original):
Things can go on two lists at once.

What if Things couldn't go on two lists at once? Are you saying Things aren't people too? If you could list Things on one list instead of two but list them twice instead of once, are you saying that is wrong? If you could save one list by listing two Things, I suppose that would make me listless? So you would rather double down on lists and ignore Things? If you can do two Things at once, can't you also do two lists at once with one list and two Things? You don't make sense.