I don't see why that option should not be available, but no I wouldn't want to be that aggressive. That extreme counter example is misrepresenting my position, although I see no reason why a user shouldn't be afforded that option. In an ideal world, I would want detailed options that could be modified based on distance to go, field position, and if possible score and time to go. While that would be fun, really all I'm asking for are more aggressive options on the slider than is allowed below. Below is the outline of the "very aggressive" slider option.
Outside the opp 38, on 4th and 3 or worse, I'm forced to punt. This is a 18-30 yard punt most often. I'm not going to share the math on all the situations here, and I've already shared too much from a competitive strategy standpoint. However, the option should exist for people to be too aggressive, but right now, the most aggressive option is just mathematically dumb in a lot of spots. It seems like the most aggressive option should be too aggressive in some spots and it's definitely too still too conservative. Inside the opponents 40 it's not crazy to consider going for it on 4th and long, and certainly not 4th and manageable like 4th and 5. Another issue is that inside the opp 27, I'm forced to kick a fg on 4th and 3 or worse, sometimes people may want to forgo the fg to try for 7, especially if failing could pin the opponents deep in their own territory.
This is in a vacuum, before adjusting for wanting to be extra aggressive certain spots such as trailing by 14 with 10 minutes left in the 4th. I've probably said too much, but there's a lot of smart and experimental users here and it seems like 4th down strategy is something coaches would want the option to tweak. At worst throwing a couple more aggressive options on the slider probably would be a huge upgrade. Heck, if I had to choose between go for it all the time versus the current very aggressive option, I'd have to at least think about it in certain matchups.
I certainly can't speak for the programming effort involved but even taking the existing options and just shifting the 4th and x to 4th and x+4, or moving the yardage break points back 15 yards would be welcomed as a great improvement.
Thanks for listening and your consideration. If there's a more relevant thread to post a request for model change, let me know. I just posted here to see if I was just overlooking an option somewhere since I'm relatively new and the conservatism here is startling. I can't imagine I'm the first to want to be more aggressive on 4th down than what is offered.
Very Aggressive
4th and 1 OWN 41 - OPP 1
4th and 2 OPP 42 - OPP 24, OPP 14 - OPP 1
4th and 3 OPP 38 - OPP 27
4th and 4 OPP 35 - OPP 29
4th and 5 OPP 34 - OPP 30
12/15/2015 10:50 AM (edited)