Iverson's not 100% at SG?
Rip Hamilton's not 100% at SF?
huh?

Josh Howard was already mentioned, but he really should be 100% at SF since he starts at and plays mostly SF for the Mavs.

Rudy Fernandez should be sg/sf 100% not pg/sg 100%.

There are some issues with the Bobcats. Larry Brown likes to use Augustin & Felton in the backcourt at the same time but they are both 90% at SG. Felton really should be 100% at SG. Diaw's 96% at PF should be 100% PF. Who's the PF when it's Diaw (96% at PF) & Radmanovic (92% at PF) as the forwards?

It's very odd that Peja hasn't been above 96% at SG for his entire career (normally 91-94%) but becomes 100% at SG as a 31 year old with SG as his official position. Why is Shawn Marion 100% at SG? Shawn Marion couldn't play SG IRL to save his life. He's never been above 92% at SG before. Jeff Green should be 100% at PF instead of 91%. He's like Rashard Lewis in that he is better suited at SF but gets minutes at PF with his team.

Quote: Originally posted by ashamael on 5/12/2009Rondo
House
Ray Allen
Big Baby
Perkins

That's been a common line-up for the Celtics. How come Ray Allen isn't 100% at SF?

Eddie House should be at 100% SG and is not.

I went through the Portland roster and noted numeous errors. I mean Batum started all year at SF and never once played SG. But the SIM has him at 100% SG and 98% SF ??? Are the guys who set this up fans with any special knowlege or expertise ?

Quote: Originally Posted By vancem on 5/12/2009 Are the guys who set this up fans with any special knowlege or expertise ?

not at all

well, depends on what you mean by "special"

I'm generally a WIS apolgist, I think the site is better than most but it is unreal how bad this is.

Check the position effectiveness thread for discussion on positions.

is there going to be a defensive rating thread as well because you know, looney tunes

Quote: Originally posted by scudmissle on 5/11/2009i've checked 11 seasons (what i perceive as the best ones) and i'd put forth that the 08-09 season is the greatest wisnba one in the data base. across the board, there's no other season to beat it... and the salaries are cheaper.

def is off the charts, not to mention 3's made. wow!

Have to agree. Also lots of good shooting and usage. Defense seems very high. The only downside would be minutes played, lots of partial seasons.
I can see a LOT of people using these guys. In fact the entire 08-09 season could become the new cookie cutters IMO.

How come JR Smith is listed at ast% 17 on basketballreference.com but 13% here?

bbr does ast% differently. If you notice, cp3 has like 50+ there and only 39 here.

I'm not sure how wis does it, though... seems odd to be that big of disparity.

Quote: Originally Posted By ashamael on 5/12/2009bbr does ast% differently. If you notice, cp3 has like 50+ there and only 39 here.

I'm not sure how wis does it, though... seems odd to be that big of disparity

and to link to the site to boot