For example…and I don't want to rush you but…look at the first line.  The first thing you said.      vvvvvvvv

YOU SAID:  The number of Americans filing for unemployment benefits fell more than expected last week, drifting back to near 42-year lows as labor market conditions continue to tighten.

I have a few questions.
1.)  What was expected and what is the 42 year low?  You have a 42 year low number.  What is it?  Why is it so low?  How NEAR is it to the 42 year low you refer to? 
2.)  What do you mean when you say Market conditions tighten?  

  Thanks for helping me out here bronx.  I don't understand this stuff like you do.

And I also have another question about this next thing.  Here's what you said:

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits declined 12,000 to a seasonally adjusted 260,000 for the week ended Nov. 21, the Labor Department said on Wednesday.

What does that mean?  What is seasonally adjusted and who determines that?  Who makes these claims?  Is it some guys with time on their hands and they do it for nothing OR do these guys got a real job?  Who pays them?  Who do they work for?  Does it change depending on what administration is in charge?  Who checks their numbers? Do they got a name?  Will they come on television someday and tell us who they are and explain what they do and confirm their numbers each and every week on the news shows?

And I have another question.  EVERY TIME THEY GIVE OUT these numbers for the last 7 years, they come out with an adjusted figure about a week later.  WHY?


PLUSEWISE the adjusted number is always worse than the one they gave in the first place.  Why does that happen and why do they do that.  Why don't they just wait another week and give out the real true number instead of always giving a crap stupid fake shithole number?

Tell me if I'm bugging you but I just GOTTA ask about this next line.



The prior week's claims were revised to show 1,000 more applications received than previously reported. Claims have now held below the 300,000 threshold for 38 consecutive weeks, the longest stretch in years, and remain close to levels last seen in the early 1970s. Claims below this level are usually associated with a healthy jobs market.



That's what I was talking about.  Revised. And you say it right here.  1,000 more.  
Claims below 300,00 for 38 weeks.  Longest in years.  WHAT YEARS?  WHICH YEARS?  Why don't they explain it better?
ALSO they say this is close to levels last seen in the early 70's.  The early 70's sucked.  THEN it sucked even worse when Jimmy Carter became President.
WHY are they comparing this economy to the one I grew up with when I was a kid and the economy and Carter sucked?  IT SUCKED!
THEN that have to say usually.  Why do they have to say "USUALLY" associated with a healthy economy?  It almost sounds like they are liars.

WELL….we went this far so we might as well finish it.  Here's the last line you wrote:

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast claims dipping to 270,000 last week. A Labor Department analyst said there were no special factors influencing the data and only claims for Louisiana had been estimated.

NOW I'm really confused.  REUTERS?  REALLY?  REUTERS has our back on this and they only poll THEIR ECONOMISTS?  THIS IS A REUTERS STORY?

ARE YOU KIDDING ME?  NO WONDER!!!  HOLY CRAP!  I'm sorry.  I'm really sorry.  I didn't know.

I did't know it was Reuters or came from big brother white house control freak administration obama lie factory as doctored and retold by the propaganda machine.

It looked official.  And I suppose it is.  Official lies from the State. 

WOW!  I guess it pays to actually read the articles.  

YEP, REUTERS NEWS SERVICE. PICKED IT UP OFF THAT ULTRA-LIBERAL, FOX NEWS,COM. THEY USE AP TOO.

REUTERS AND ALL USE THE LABOR DEPT. NUMBERS. THEY WERE BELIEVABLE FOR YEARS AND YEARS......UNTIL THAT UPPITY DARKY SEIZED POWER.

THEIR NUMBERS WERE BELIEVABLE EVEN IN 2012, WHEN THE MITTSTER TALKED ABOUT JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. GUESS OBAMA COOKED THE BOOKS EVEN WHEN THEY HURT HIM.

ROMNEY IN A LANDSLIDE!

LOL

DARKY COOKING THE BOOKS

Posted by bronxcheer on 11/26/2015 11:59:00 AM (view original):
YEP, REUTERS NEWS SERVICE. PICKED IT UP OFF THAT ULTRA-LIBERAL, FOX NEWS,COM. THEY USE AP TOO.

REUTERS AND ALL USE THE LABOR DEPT. NUMBERS. THEY WERE BELIEVABLE FOR YEARS AND YEARS......UNTIL THAT UPPITY DARKY SEIZED POWER.

THEIR NUMBERS WERE BELIEVABLE EVEN IN 2012, WHEN THE MITTSTER TALKED ABOUT JOBS, JOBS, JOBS. GUESS OBAMA COOKED THE BOOKS EVEN WHEN THEY HURT HIM.

ROMNEY IN A LANDSLIDE!

HA!  You make us laugh.  Happy thanksgiving!  Let's clean up your dirty post. 

Reuters sucks and are left wing media.  AP sucks and is left wing media.  That means propaganda to you.  ALL your sources are lies and propaganda. Nothing you post is true because it comes from the belly of lies.  You are the acid indigestion. 

FOXNEWS.COM

SHOW ME OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!

SHOW ME OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN!