Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Posted by jwelsh1023 on 5/15/2012 5:11:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 5:00:00 PM (view original):
And, yes, I do think there has to be guidelines for marriage. 

A successful society has to have rules.  
Guidelines for something that is pointless without the religious background?
This.  If it is pointless and not necessary, why are guidelines needed?
5/15/2012 5:14 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/14/2012 4:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 1:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/13/2012 7:09:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:24:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/12/2012 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/11/2012 9:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 9:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Sorry, I'm not up on the sodomy laws.   Let's get back to immorality.  Many people think incest is immoral.  Many people think homosexuality is immoral.  Why is one legal?

Maybe morality isn't the only criteria for legality
If gengxcon and hissis, both consenting adults, are willing to risk pregnancy/deformed babies, how is that different than two dudes, consenting adults, willing to risk AIDS?
Do you actually want to sign your name to such a dumb question? I'll answer if you like, but I'll give you chance to take it back first, considering how multi-layered with stupidity that question is.
Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.  

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?
That didn't even make sense. How many mulligans do I have to give you?
Sure it did.   You're screwing your sister, you had planned on getting married and it's illegal.  

Explain, in 500 words or less, how that situation is different than two men wishing to be married.    And "The law says it's illegal" isn't going to cut it. 
Hello?
This still makes no sense. Can anyone translate from Mike to English? Tec? Padna? Anyone?

I'll take that as "I don't like the question.   Two strangers who meet and fall in love would be the same as two strangers who meet and fall in love from a moral standpoint(assuming you don't object to homosexuality) so I'd going to pretend I don't understand." 

We're done here.

You're asking a completely irrelevant question. I can play that game, too:


Some people think eaing meat is immoral. Some people think rooting for the Yankees is immoral. What's the difference?


Now, pay attention.









Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:59:00 AM:
To give this some direction, quit telling me that many people think X or Y is immoral. Tell me why you do.






Until you quit evading this question, you are wasting my time with pointless drivel.
5/15/2012 5:31 PM
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/15/2012 5:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/14/2012 4:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 1:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/13/2012 7:09:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:24:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/12/2012 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/11/2012 9:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 9:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Sorry, I'm not up on the sodomy laws.   Let's get back to immorality.  Many people think incest is immoral.  Many people think homosexuality is immoral.  Why is one legal?

Maybe morality isn't the only criteria for legality
If gengxcon and hissis, both consenting adults, are willing to risk pregnancy/deformed babies, how is that different than two dudes, consenting adults, willing to risk AIDS?
Do you actually want to sign your name to such a dumb question? I'll answer if you like, but I'll give you chance to take it back first, considering how multi-layered with stupidity that question is.
Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.  

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?
That didn't even make sense. How many mulligans do I have to give you?
Sure it did.   You're screwing your sister, you had planned on getting married and it's illegal.  

Explain, in 500 words or less, how that situation is different than two men wishing to be married.    And "The law says it's illegal" isn't going to cut it. 
Hello?
This still makes no sense. Can anyone translate from Mike to English? Tec? Padna? Anyone?

I'll take that as "I don't like the question.   Two strangers who meet and fall in love would be the same as two strangers who meet and fall in love from a moral standpoint(assuming you don't object to homosexuality) so I'd going to pretend I don't understand." 

We're done here.

You're asking a completely irrelevant question. I can play that game, too:


Some people think eaing meat is immoral. Some people think rooting for the Yankees is immoral. What's the difference?


Now, pay attention.









Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:59:00 AM:
To give this some direction, quit telling me that many people think X or Y is immoral. Tell me why you do.






Until you quit evading this question, you are wasting my time with pointless drivel.
I just wanted to see how skinny the paragraphs would get.
5/15/2012 5:46 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/15/2012 4:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 4:50:00 PM (view original):
You'd have to convince me that marriage is a right.   I don't think it is.   You're required to get a license.   Much like you're required to get a gun license, register to vote or get a driver's license.    If there are guidelines for your inclusion in an activity, seems like it's a privilege.
Voting is a right, not a privilege.  Gun ownership too, for the most part.
If this is your fundamental stance, then you don't understand what a "right" is.

Especially given your reliance on "the founding fathers", who wouldn't let women, blacks, or internet debaters vote.
5/15/2012 5:48 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 5/15/2012 5:48:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/15/2012 4:54:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 4:50:00 PM (view original):
You'd have to convince me that marriage is a right.   I don't think it is.   You're required to get a license.   Much like you're required to get a gun license, register to vote or get a driver's license.    If there are guidelines for your inclusion in an activity, seems like it's a privilege.
Voting is a right, not a privilege.  Gun ownership too, for the most part.
If this is your fundamental stance, then you don't understand what a "right" is.

Especially given your reliance on "the founding fathers", who wouldn't let women, blacks, or internet debaters vote.
The 15th Amendment, while dealing specifically with former slaves, says this:

"The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude"



5/15/2012 6:08 PM
So, you're claiming that all of our "rights" only count if they are granted by old white dudes?
5/15/2012 6:43 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 5/15/2012 5:46:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/15/2012 5:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/14/2012 4:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 1:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/13/2012 7:09:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:24:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/12/2012 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/11/2012 9:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 9:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Sorry, I'm not up on the sodomy laws.   Let's get back to immorality.  Many people think incest is immoral.  Many people think homosexuality is immoral.  Why is one legal?

Maybe morality isn't the only criteria for legality
If gengxcon and hissis, both consenting adults, are willing to risk pregnancy/deformed babies, how is that different than two dudes, consenting adults, willing to risk AIDS?
Do you actually want to sign your name to such a dumb question? I'll answer if you like, but I'll give you chance to take it back first, considering how multi-layered with stupidity that question is.
Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.  

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?
That didn't even make sense. How many mulligans do I have to give you?
Sure it did.   You're screwing your sister, you had planned on getting married and it's illegal.  

Explain, in 500 words or less, how that situation is different than two men wishing to be married.    And "The law says it's illegal" isn't going to cut it. 
Hello?
This still makes no sense. Can anyone translate from Mike to English? Tec? Padna? Anyone?

I'll take that as "I don't like the question.   Two strangers who meet and fall in love would be the same as two strangers who meet and fall in love from a moral standpoint(assuming you don't object to homosexuality) so I'd going to pretend I don't understand." 

We're done here.

You're asking a completely irrelevant question. I can play that game, too:


Some people think eaing meat is immoral. Some people think rooting for the Yankees is immoral. What's the difference?


Now, pay attention.









Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:59:00 AM:
To give this some direction, quit telling me that many people think X or Y is immoral. Tell me why you do.






Until you quit evading this question, you are wasting my time with pointless drivel.
I just wanted to see how skinny the paragraphs would get.
Pretty impressive.
5/15/2012 6:46 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 5/15/2012 6:43:00 PM (view original):
So, you're claiming that all of our "rights" only count if they are granted by old white dudes?
Never said that.

5/15/2012 6:54 PM
Posted by tecwrg2 on 5/15/2012 2:23:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg2 on 5/15/2012 1:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/15/2012 1:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg2 on 5/15/2012 1:42:00 PM (view original):
Sorry, that's deflecting the question again.

Why do YOU think that same-sex marriage is an inalienable right?
Yes, same sex marriage is a right.  As is heterosexual marriage.

Do you think marriage itself is a right?
I didn't ask if you thought same-sex marriage was a right.  You've been arguing that for 20+ pages, so obviously you do.

I asked WHY you think same-sex marriage is a right.
Still waiting for an answer to this.
Have you given a direct answer to this, or are still still continuing to ignore/evade a direct question?
5/15/2012 7:49 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/15/2012 5:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 5:08:00 PM (view original):
If your right can be revoked or denied, it doesn't feel like a right.    If you've been paying attention, you'd know that I've said, repeatedly, that your "rights" are what the governing body says they are when they say they are.   You can't just scream "I KNOW MY RIGHTS" and think anyone cares. 

I don't care if you think it  doesn't "feel" like a right.  Voting is a right.

I don't care what you think.  If it can be revoked or denied, I don't care if you think it's your right or not.    It's your right until someone with more authority says it isn't.
5/15/2012 7:53 PM
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/15/2012 5:31:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 4:30:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/14/2012 4:28:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/14/2012 1:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/13/2012 7:09:00 AM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:24:00 AM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/12/2012 4:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by genghisxcon on 5/11/2012 9:08:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 9:02:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 9:00:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 8:57:00 PM (view original):

Sorry, I'm not up on the sodomy laws.   Let's get back to immorality.  Many people think incest is immoral.  Many people think homosexuality is immoral.  Why is one legal?

Maybe morality isn't the only criteria for legality
If gengxcon and hissis, both consenting adults, are willing to risk pregnancy/deformed babies, how is that different than two dudes, consenting adults, willing to risk AIDS?
Do you actually want to sign your name to such a dumb question? I'll answer if you like, but I'll give you chance to take it back first, considering how multi-layered with stupidity that question is.
Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.  

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?
That didn't even make sense. How many mulligans do I have to give you?
Sure it did.   You're screwing your sister, you had planned on getting married and it's illegal.  

Explain, in 500 words or less, how that situation is different than two men wishing to be married.    And "The law says it's illegal" isn't going to cut it. 
Hello?
This still makes no sense. Can anyone translate from Mike to English? Tec? Padna? Anyone?

I'll take that as "I don't like the question.   Two strangers who meet and fall in love would be the same as two strangers who meet and fall in love from a moral standpoint(assuming you don't object to homosexuality) so I'd going to pretend I don't understand." 

We're done here.

You're asking a completely irrelevant question. I can play that game, too:


Some people think eaing meat is immoral. Some people think rooting for the Yankees is immoral. What's the difference?


Now, pay attention.









Posted by genghisxcon on 5/13/2012 12:59:00 AM:
To give this some direction, quit telling me that many people think X or Y is immoral. Tell me why you do.






Until you quit evading this question, you are wasting my time with pointless drivel.
I don't make judgements on lifestyle choices.   I don't care about the lifestyle choices when it doesn't affect me.

Now, if you would answer the question.   I'll tighten it up for you:

Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.  

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?

5/15/2012 7:57 PM
Gee, I'm not sure. But I'd say it's the same difference as if the example stipulated a dude and a girl instead of two dudes, morally speaking. Unless you can offer some reason to think otherwise.
5/15/2012 8:20 PM
The example stipulated exactly what I typed.   Two strangers met and fell in love.   You seem to believe one set is cool to get married yet there's a problem with the other set.   I want to understand why you think there's a difference. 
5/15/2012 8:23 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 7:53:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/15/2012 5:14:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/15/2012 5:08:00 PM (view original):
If your right can be revoked or denied, it doesn't feel like a right.    If you've been paying attention, you'd know that I've said, repeatedly, that your "rights" are what the governing body says they are when they say they are.   You can't just scream "I KNOW MY RIGHTS" and think anyone cares. 

I don't care if you think it  doesn't "feel" like a right.  Voting is a right.

I don't care what you think.  If it can be revoked or denied, I don't care if you think it's your right or not.    It's your right until someone with more authority says it isn't.
That's EVERYTHING.  By your definition there are no rights.  You have the right to life until someone with more authority decides to end yours.
5/15/2012 8:41 PM
I don't make judgements on lifestyle choices.   I don't care about the lifestyle choices when it doesn't affect me.

Now, if you would answer the question.   I'll tighten it up for you:

Sure.  I'll lay out a scenario for you.  You tell me the problem.

Your mother puts you in a trash can when you're an infant because you're an annoying bastard.   The trashman finds you and raises you as his own.  He never mentions finding you in a smelly trash can.

25 years later, you meet a girl.   You date, you fall in love.   Turns out, your mother and father decided to try to make a better baby after you were discarded.   You're now dating, and nailing, your sister.     Incest is illegal.   

What's the difference between you and your sis in this situation and two dudes in love, morally speaking?

Children from incestual relationships often have massive birth defects.  The government has an interest in preventing that.  That concern is obviously not present with regard to same sex relationships.  So incest is illegal, homosexuality isn't.
5/15/2012 8:49 PM
◂ Prev 1...37|38|39|40|41...462 Next ▸
Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.