Quote: Originally Posted By doubletruck on 5/14/2008
Most of us have experienced the kind of weird variation that John's example invokes.
On my current teams, the same Bobby Abreu is playing on two very similar teams, both in $80m leagues in RFK Stadium.
One of them has 174 PA, 3 HR, 15 RBI, a .215 BA and .322 OBP.
The other one is 113 PA, 4 HR, 22 RBI, a .337 BA and .398 OBP.
Given the same talent and similar context, the rest is just luck.
What drives must of us stir crazy is when bad luck sticks to one player -- or one lineup spot or roster position -- and won't go away.
I've used both Sandy Koufax and Joe Wood in their best years in the same rotation spot on one high-cap team that is in first place just barely. If either Sandy or Joe came anywhere close to expectations, the team would have a sizeable lead. Instead, Koufax went 2-7 and Wood is 1-8. Two other Joe Wood '12 iterations on other teams in the league are 7-5 and 7-7.
And then I get to wondering how much luck is involved in real life: when Barry Zito can't live up to his high-value contract or when a Walt Dropo comes along and has one sensational season and then falls into mediocrity. Luck in the form of random outcomes must be more of a factor in the sim than in life, but I wonder if luck isn't a much larger factor in real life than most of us are accustomed to thinking that it is.
excerpts from my now extinct
" Does the SIM insert drama intentionally? " thread If doubletruck's Every - Player - Is - An - All - Star - Theory applies, would this mean themes and progressive leagues which have a small, more similar to Real Life population of players have significantly less drama.
I do not accept the Every - Player - Is - An - All - Star - Theory as an explanation for the drama. I anticipated hearing it, but do not think that is the reason for how the SIM works.
The first year I was on the site I tried out many types of leagues, only a handful of open leagues, and now am currently only in Year by Year Progressive Leagues and/or Historical era Leagues, progressing at two or six seasons at a time.
And my problem is it is much more likely to see Dal Maxvil, Duane Kuiper, or picher Bill Hands slug his team to victory then baseball history would lead us to believe.
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 5:01 am
doubletruck
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 2934 Dal Maxvill was a stick. That's history...
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 9:16 am
JohnGPF
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 19150 ...assuming a given owner is neither an idiot nor a genius, the salary cap keeps the talent levels of the various teams much, much closer than they are in real life...
...the only drama in the game is the drama we impose upon it...
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 10:12 pm
harnclan
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 353 In addition to John's comment, couldnt it just be as simple as the fact that during the season there are only 16 games a night and "stranger than fiction" things still happen occasionally
(how 'bout an 0-11 streak in the middle of a 30 game hitting streak) ...
but seem to happen much more often here where there are literally hundreds (thousands?) of games played each night?
Maybe just sheer volume of games combined with (in most cases) far more closely matched talent levels?
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 10:14 pm
billyho1515
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 41963 The online poker:bad beat argument.
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 10:23 pm
harnclan
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 353 I'm afraid I'd have to agree with that argument too. Have taken my share of bad beats at the poker tables in Vegas ... but the pure volume of hands that I've played online hugely outnumber the 20 or so hands per hour at the table.
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 10:38 pm
JohnGPF
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 19150 ...there were 42 MLB games from 9/28-9/30 with 11 decided in the last 2 at bats for each team...the last 3 games for the first 14 of teams in my TMC have 10 decided in the last 2 at bats...
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 10:41 pm
JohnGPF
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 19150 ...same # from 9/26-9/28 with 10 late decisions...
...same # from 9/18-9/20 with 10 late decisions...
----------------------------------------------------------------
10/09/2006 at 11:02 pm
harnclan
Hall of Famer
Forum Posts: 353 wow, thats pretty consistent
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
new thread