Posted by Arfy on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):
It felt to me like Polabonez was leading the charge for this whole Nyaggie thing. 

Posted by polabonez on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by csudak on 7/16/2012 5:23:00 PM (view original):
I agree with pola that the doctor and cop need to hook up, but the whole "godfather" role screws up me, whoops, I mean the cop investigating people and assuming they are innocent.  There is no certain innocent in this game.  The only certain thing for the cop is knowing who is just a mafia if they get a guilty.  

 

As far as you pointing the finger at me mudda, thinking that I'm suspicious if I told everyone casey was the cop... That makes no sense either.  I'd have to look back, but I don't think I told ANYONE casey was the cop.... Except for you.

In the above quote, taken from page 5, Casey basically said (or at least bluffed) cop right in the open.  The only person I even talked about this to was Casey himself, when I told him that if he was in fact the cop he really shouldn't put it out there for everyone to see in the open....  

In fact, he never even openly admitted to me he was the cop.  The only person he supossedly admitted it to was iamthetwo, and he waited to come forward until after casey was dead.

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by iamthetwo__2 on 7/18/2012 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Check out my previous post.

I still don't get it.  Why vote for someone you feel is safe rather than either vote for who you think is guilty or trying to convince the rest of us to vote for who you think is guilty?  Maybe I'm missing something, so you'll need to explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.  What's the logic behind voting to lynch someone you think is safe?

Posted by caesari on 7/18/2012 11:19:00 AM (view original):

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by iamthetwo__2 on 7/18/2012 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Check out my previous post.

I still don't get it.  Why vote for someone you feel is safe rather than either vote for who you think is guilty or trying to convince the rest of us to vote for who you think is guilty?  Maybe I'm missing something, so you'll need to explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.  What's the logic behind voting to lynch someone you think is safe?

I've spent the past 10 minutes looking for the Office clip "explain it to me like I am a five year old."

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:14:00 AM (view original):

Posted by polabonez on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by csudak on 7/16/2012 5:23:00 PM (view original):
I agree with pola that the doctor and cop need to hook up, but the whole "godfather" role screws up me, whoops, I mean the cop investigating people and assuming they are innocent.  There is no certain innocent in this game.  The only certain thing for the cop is knowing who is just a mafia if they get a guilty.  

 

As far as you pointing the finger at me mudda, thinking that I'm suspicious if I told everyone casey was the cop... That makes no sense either.  I'd have to look back, but I don't think I told ANYONE casey was the cop.... Except for you.

In the above quote, taken from page 5, Casey basically said (or at least bluffed) cop right in the open.  The only person I even talked about this to was Casey himself, when I told him that if he was in fact the cop he really shouldn't put it out there for everyone to see in the open....  

In fact, he never even openly admitted to me he was the cop.  The only person he supossedly admitted it to was iamthetwo, and he waited to come forward until after casey was dead.

I'm pointing fingers at everyone.  I'm not saying you told everyone.  I'm asking if anyone else left discussed it with you in sitemails.

Just because someone BLUFFS cop doesn't mean that person IS cop.

If iamthe2 knew he was the cop, I think he would've killed him or voted to lynch him.

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by caesari on 7/18/2012 11:19:00 AM (view original):

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by iamthetwo__2 on 7/18/2012 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Check out my previous post.

I still don't get it.  Why vote for someone you feel is safe rather than either vote for who you think is guilty or trying to convince the rest of us to vote for who you think is guilty?  Maybe I'm missing something, so you'll need to explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.  What's the logic behind voting to lynch someone you think is safe?

I've spent the past 10 minutes looking for the Office clip "explain it to me like I am a five year old."

I believe that was first used by Denzel's lawyer character in Philadelphia.

Posted by csudak on 7/16/2012 9:27:00 PM (view original):
I'll give it a shot.  I haven't really reached out to anyone, as is my nature in the these games, but I do have some info from what other people have sent me and responded to on group emails.

1. yoijames - Dead.
2. babcick - Don't know anything about him, except he takes great offense to people messing with his username.  Mafia take great pride in their nicknames... a coincidence? Hmmm... something to look into
3. iamthetwo_2 - No contact with him, but I think if he was mafia he would have gone after baby chick, rrr, babcick.
4. Polabonez - Wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him. 
5. nyaggie98 - No contact, top suspect to be the godfather.
6. Arfy - Let's just lynch him, we are really just delaying the inevitable
7. Csudak - Arrogant *****,ahh, I mean don't lynch me.  Trust me.  I swear.  I'm trustworthy.  
8. Muddapucka - I believe he is a townie, really no other reason than i like his name
9. Ffbplayergod - similar to pola's thoughts in that he is the true wildcard

I will leave you with this, I know something you don't know.

Posted by caesari on 7/18/2012 11:22:00 AM (view original):

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:20:00 AM (view original):

Posted by caesari on 7/18/2012 11:19:00 AM (view original):

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:11:00 AM (view original):

Posted by iamthetwo__2 on 7/18/2012 11:05:00 AM (view original):
Check out my previous post.

I still don't get it.  Why vote for someone you feel is safe rather than either vote for who you think is guilty or trying to convince the rest of us to vote for who you think is guilty?  Maybe I'm missing something, so you'll need to explain it to me like I'm 5 years old.  What's the logic behind voting to lynch someone you think is safe?

I've spent the past 10 minutes looking for the Office clip "explain it to me like I am a five year old."

I believe that was first used by Denzel's lawyer character in Philadelphia.

You would be correct. But I like the office clip better.

but alas, you will just have to imagine I posted it.

Posted by polabonez on 7/18/2012 11:26:00 AM (view original):
Here is what I don't like:

ffb and babcick are not in the conversation... and haven't really said **** on the forums.  That is suspicious.

mudda and iamthetwo's whole situation that is developing here.

arfy.

So yeah, I have no freaking clue....  

But in my mind unless iamthetwo can come up with some sound reasoning in wtf he is talking about than I don't know what to say other than he is the front runner in my mind.... 

I will say this, I would like the vote today to go in a certain order.  And I would like iamthetwo to vote first.

The most important thing is that we don't lynch the cop or the doctor.  That is why I vote to lynch Nyaggie.  He seems to be playing the 'I'm a doctor now, don't hurt me" card.  Seems pretty fishy to me.   Especially for Nyaggie. I know since I am one of the other targets that what I have to say doesn't really mean much.  But it is pretty much my word against his.  I'm willing to change my vote if  something else transpires, but you better do it quick as I have a very limited window between now and the cut off time.

I also encourage the cop to investigate me tonight, so we can work together to figure this thing out!

Posted by muddapucka on 7/18/2012 11:36:00 AM (view original):

Posted by polabonez on 7/18/2012 11:26:00 AM (view original):
Here is what I don't like:

ffb and babcick are not in the conversation... and haven't really said **** on the forums.  That is suspicious.

mudda and iamthetwo's whole situation that is developing here.

arfy.

So yeah, I have no freaking clue....  

But in my mind unless iamthetwo can come up with some sound reasoning in wtf he is talking about than I don't know what to say other than he is the front runner in my mind.... 

I will say this, I would like the vote today to go in a certain order.  And I would like iamthetwo to vote first.

Spoken like someone in charge, a Godfather.

Sorry, couldn't resist.