1886 Jim Lillie is by far the most used player in the ultra low cap leagues ($30-40M). With a salary of $1,467,402 and 572 PA/162, he is by far the lowest $/PA players with over 500 PA’s. And he comes with B- range in the OF which is on the higher end in these low cap leagues. But, his performance can vary. His RL numbers:
GP |
PA/162 |
AB/162 |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
RS |
SO |
BB |
SB |
CS |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
114 |
572 |
557 |
73 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
22 |
37 |
80 |
11 |
13 |
31 |
0.175 |
0.197 |
0.197 |
0.394 |
The seasons I have used him:
Sea |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
BB |
SO |
HBP |
SB |
CS |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
6 |
161 |
616 |
62 |
166 |
17 |
1 |
4 |
78 |
24 |
69 |
2 |
8 |
14 |
0.269 |
0.297 |
0.320 |
0.617 |
7 |
162 |
650 |
62 |
166 |
19 |
0 |
6 |
54 |
13 |
109 |
5 |
16 |
21 |
0.255 |
0.275 |
0.312 |
0.587 |
6 |
161 |
607 |
44 |
129 |
16 |
2 |
5 |
47 |
21 |
88 |
1 |
5 |
18 |
0.213 |
0.240 |
0.270 |
0.510 |
5 |
162 |
674 |
55 |
136 |
11 |
1 |
1 |
37 |
21 |
91 |
1 |
8 |
13 |
0.202 |
0.227 |
0.226 |
0.452 |
All of the seasons above were played at Safeco but the variation is huge, a whopping .165 difference in OPS. Luckily, overall team performance is not largely affected as his two worst seasons were also his only two playoff appearances.
Other top performers for me have been:
Sea |
Player |
SN |
G |
AB |
R |
H |
2B |
3B |
HR |
RBI |
BB |
SO |
SB |
AVG |
OBP |
SLG |
OPS |
STRK |
L STRK |
5 |
Workman, Chuck |
1944 |
145 |
526 |
86 |
147 |
22 |
5 |
33 |
109 |
53 |
47 |
0 |
0.279 |
0.346 |
0.529 |
0.874 |
8 |
8 |
3 |
Greene, Todd |
1999 |
101 |
437 |
68 |
132 |
27 |
0 |
24 |
109 |
14 |
64 |
0 |
0.302 |
0.325 |
0.529 |
0.854 |
0 |
12 |
5 |
Palka, Daniel |
2018 |
145 |
568 |
101 |
157 |
32 |
10 |
27 |
95 |
44 |
128 |
0 |
0.276 |
0.334 |
0.511 |
0.845 |
6 |
13 |
7 |
Motley, Darryl |
1985 |
125 |
497 |
89 |
140 |
31 |
2 |
30 |
89 |
19 |
46 |
19 |
0.282 |
0.311 |
0.533 |
0.844 |
6 |
8 |
3 |
Franco, Maikel |
2021 |
129 |
452 |
66 |
125 |
29 |
1 |
25 |
78 |
29 |
33 |
0 |
0.277 |
0.322 |
0.511 |
0.833 |
5 |
9 |
6 |
Henderson, Rickey |
2000 |
146 |
551 |
135 |
164 |
25 |
2 |
6 |
42 |
130 |
59 |
107 |
0.298 |
0.438 |
0.383 |
0.821 |
8 |
10 |
2 |
Perez, Neifi |
2006 |
110 |
437 |
74 |
150 |
29 |
3 |
4 |
61 |
11 |
17 |
0 |
0.343 |
0.358 |
0.451 |
0.808 |
0 |
9 |
7 |
McAllister, Sport |
1903 |
118 |
409 |
52 |
143 |
22 |
1 |
2 |
31 |
17 |
14 |
3 |
0.350 |
0.380 |
0.423 |
0.803 |
3 |
11 |
6 |
Ganzel, Charlie |
1888 |
147 |
572 |
80 |
195 |
24 |
4 |
2 |
63 |
27 |
19 |
18 |
0.341 |
0.373 |
0.407 |
0.780 |
0 |
23 |
4 |
Corcoran, Tim |
1978 |
128 |
425 |
54 |
141 |
22 |
1 |
0 |
48 |
34 |
18 |
4 |
0.332 |
0.387 |
0.388 |
0.775 |
1 |
8 |
6 |
Lopez, Nicky |
2022 |
146 |
550 |
84 |
177 |
17 |
9 |
3 |
40 |
41 |
45 |
34 |
0.322 |
0.372 |
0.402 |
0.774 |
10 |
10 |
6 |
Ganzel, Charlie |
1888 |
146 |
591 |
83 |
187 |
34 |
6 |
5 |
112 |
30 |
21 |
11 |
0.316 |
0.354 |
0.420 |
0.773 |
0 |
25 |
4 |
Gallagher, Al |
1973 |
119 |
408 |
65 |
133 |
13 |
2 |
0 |
44 |
50 |
23 |
1 |
0.326 |
0.403 |
0.368 |
0.771 |
0 |
11 |
4 |
Lopez, Nicky |
2022 |
145 |
536 |
90 |
168 |
20 |
11 |
1 |
69 |
29 |
32 |
39 |
0.313 |
0.354 |
0.397 |
0.751 |
2 |
10 |
2 |
Buckner, Bill |
1987 |
99 |
400 |
45 |
121 |
13 |
5 |
2 |
44 |
18 |
14 |
0 |
0.303 |
0.340 |
0.375 |
0.715 |
1 |
11 |
2 |
Kuiper, Duane |
1981 |
121 |
455 |
66 |
147 |
18 |
1 |
0 |
50 |
17 |
15 |
0 |
0.323 |
0.348 |
0.367 |
0.715 |
6 |
15 |
4 |
Alomar, Sandy |
1974 |
114 |
447 |
74 |
138 |
12 |
2 |
2 |
49 |
18 |
28 |
19 |
0.309 |
0.338 |
0.358 |
0.696 |
2 |
14 |
2 |
Keeler, Willie |
1907 |
162 |
637 |
74 |
196 |
14 |
1 |
3 |
85 |
29 |
26 |
1 |
0.308 |
0.338 |
0.347 |
0.685 |
6 |
7 |
And for pitchers:
Season |
Player |
SN |
G |
GS |
CG |
SHO |
W |
L |
SV |
SVO |
IP |
H |
R |
ER |
HR |
BB |
SO |
OAV |
OBP |
SLG |
WHIP |
ERA |
6 |
Rosenthal, Trevor |
2017 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
40 |
41 |
40.0 |
22 |
2 |
1 |
0 |
5 |
31 |
0.155 |
0.193 |
0.155 |
0.68 |
0.23 |
7 |
Gray, Josiah |
2022 |
34 |
33 |
0 |
0 |
17 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
228.7 |
150 |
74 |
60 |
20 |
55 |
216 |
0.181 |
0.239 |
0.279 |
0.90 |
2.36 |
5 |
Vazquez, Javier |
2010 |
32 |
32 |
2 |
1 |
13 |
14 |
0 |
0 |
220.7 |
163 |
74 |
59 |
16 |
54 |
159 |
0.198 |
0.250 |
0.297 |
0.98 |
2.41 |
2 |
Krukow, Mike |
1984 |
40 |
40 |
4 |
2 |
26 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
290.3 |
253 |
91 |
73 |
12 |
57 |
228 |
0.230 |
0.271 |
0.303 |
1.07 |
2.26 |
2 |
Coleman, Joe |
1975 |
41 |
41 |
2 |
1 |
21 |
12 |
0 |
0 |
293.7 |
251 |
127 |
92 |
15 |
71 |
219 |
0.224 |
0.274 |
0.314 |
1.10 |
2.82 |
4 |
Viola, Frank |
1983 |
41 |
41 |
1 |
0 |
21 |
9 |
0 |
0 |
288.0 |
255 |
96 |
76 |
20 |
73 |
203 |
0.237 |
0.290 |
0.328 |
1.14 |
2.38 |
6 |
Smiley, John |
1997 |
30 |
30 |
1 |
0 |
13 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
210.7 |
212 |
67 |
58 |
12 |
30 |
141 |
0.261 |
0.290 |
0.347 |
1.15 |
2.48 |
3 |
Astacio, Pedro |
1998 |
40 |
40 |
1 |
0 |
22 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
281.3 |
271 |
129 |
106 |
24 |
54 |
244 |
0.247 |
0.292 |
0.362 |
1.16 |
3.39 |
3 |
Viola, Frank |
1983 |
41 |
40 |
3 |
1 |
25 |
13 |
0 |
0 |
292.0 |
275 |
126 |
109 |
24 |
69 |
223 |
0.246 |
0.292 |
0.357 |
1.18 |
3.36 |
4 |
Krukow, Mike |
1984 |
42 |
40 |
1 |
1 |
20 |
10 |
0 |
0 |
262.7 |
248 |
89 |
75 |
9 |
63 |
202 |
0.246 |
0.293 |
0.305 |
1.18 |
2.57 |
6 |
De La Rosa, Jorge |
2016 |
30 |
30 |
0 |
0 |
20 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
190.3 |
172 |
57 |
48 |
14 |
53 |
149 |
0.235 |
0.292 |
0.321 |
1.18 |
2.27 |
4 |
Stoneman, Bill |
1970 |
35 |
35 |
3 |
1 |
23 |
8 |
0 |
0 |
259.0 |
236 |
101 |
89 |
15 |
89 |
252 |
0.238 |
0.309 |
0.319 |
1.25 |
3.09 |
4 |
Wood, Kerry |
2010 |
63 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
4 |
3 |
36 |
40 |
52.7 |
44 |
23 |
20 |
2 |
36 |
52 |
0.221 |
0.345 |
0.266 |
1.52 |
3.42 |
2 |
Dibble, Rob |
1993 |
71 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
7 |
36 |
40 |
62.7 |
57 |
31 |
27 |
1 |
41 |
66 |
0.241 |
0.352 |
0.266 |
1.56 |
3.88 |
Like Lillie showed above, all of these players can also have large variations in performance.
There are many other players who are successful in these leagues. Just4me, gogotoads, fillies, jpeterso, sinatra, rbow, area51man, and many others I am forgetting at the moment, put together some phenomenal teams and use completely different players than I use with high success rates. There are many winning strategies in the low caps with a large variety of players who can make an impact.