Sebel how hard is it to incorporate a scale like this posted in another thread by Stanford:
Keep in mind that its more difficult to receive a high rating under my model. If I had to break it down, I'd break it down like this:
95+: All-Time Level Defense
87-94: Great Defense (All-Defensive 1st Caliber)
75-86: Good Defense (All-Defensive 2nd Caliber)
60-74: Solid Defense
45-59: Average Defense
37-44: Below Average Defense
Less than 36: Liability
Is the above scale usable? From here it looks pretty accurate, saving only the best def seasons for the 95+ rating, maybe if a guy was unanimous 1st team and DPOY he gets a 95+ rating, if a player received 1st team votes but wasn't unanimous then they would drop into the 87-94 range etc etc. Is this doable??