in fairness you had a week or more to say some damn thing

Agreed, but sometimes life gets in the way of WIS.

Besides, I don't think it would have made a bit of difference.

Posted by ncih on 10/1/2010 7:48:00 PM (view original):
Don't understand why Larry Bird's base position is PF in 79-80 and 83-84, making him 100% at C instead of SF when the basic personnel on the Celtics did not change. 

Again, there really needs to be consistency over the years.

I agree on the specific observation about Bird, but not that players should necessarily have consistent PE rankings throughout their careers.  Some bulk up and/or slow down, and their capabilities shift one way or the other.  Bird certainly could have played SF full time during those seasons, but as I recall he started at PF because Maxwell was the SF.

some bulk up and slow down - precisely which is why it was always a mystery to me when they used to list the Portland Scottie Pippen 100% at SG but not the earlier more spry chicago version - there's always going to be some nonsense and we did have a shot at reviewing the product before it was issued - maybe seble will be nice and let us have a review forum and make some manual changes like he did a couple years back - I mean I wasnt around then but that's what I heard happened

There is a 72-73 Leroy Ellis that is listed as a SF for his position but is not 100 at that spot.

There may be more like this, but I thought I would point that out and maybe get people looking at that.