Quote: Originally Posted By seble on 5/11/2009The position listings come directly from our official stat source. While they are important, position effectiveness is more important. It would be very helpful if someone could compile a list of the questionable players
Thanks for the opening, seble, and for getting the new player listings done by the indicated timetable.
Just a handful of thoughts from the top 50 (in terms of salary):
- 93% at SF seems pretty low for Kobe Bryant.
- Antawn Jamison really should be 100% at PF, given that he plays there almost all the time for the Wizards. I don't care so much about the primary position listing, but 90% at PF is pretty inexplicable.
- It seems really odd that Andre Iguodala would be more effective at PG than at SF, since he swings between SG and SF and would virtually never play PG (at least on offense).
- It's hard to see why Vince Carter isn't 100% at SF. There's no reason I can see to believe he would be less capable than in the past of playing at the position he started his NBA career at.
- 90% at SG seems awfully low for Derrick Rose. If these position ratings are based purely on quantitative data - what percentage of real-life minutes were actually logged at a given position - then I can understand giving him a low rating at the 2 spot, but in that case then Ray Felton should be 100% at SG.
Thanks for the consideration.