WE WANT LEAGUES AVAILABLE WITH FEWER TEAMS THAN 24 Topic

savoybg
Posts: 2317 (0)
All Star
10 24
Prospect
Posted by riftonapple on 8/31/2024 8:20:00 PM (view original):
I am for having some variety in the number of teams required to form a league. I think its a good idea.

While the programmers are at it, I would love to see additional filters similar in wis baseball where you can sort by American League/National League, etc.
I would like to be able to sort by NBA/ABA and Eastern Conference/Western Conference.
There are literally loads of theme leagues that would have been formed if there were 8 and 12 and even 16 teams leagues available. I had a few myself that got to 8 or even 12 owners, but could not get even close to 24. I mean, it's common sense that putting 24 teams together for a theme league idea is gonna be very tough. Most have to resort to having some owners take 2 teams to be able to get to 24 teams.

I just don't get why the people who run this site would resist this. It's clear that there would be many more guys paying for seasons than there are now. If they made 8 team leagues available I'd start a progressive league with the 51-52 season immediately.
8/31/2024 11:27 PM
savoybg
Posts: 2317 (0)
All Star
10 24
Prospect
I just sent in a request for a refund for the 8 NBA seasons that I paid for but have not used. If they are not going to make leagues available for 8 teams and 12 teams I don't see myself playing anymore. Let's see what they say.
9/1/2024 2:37 PM
Lennybruce26
Posts: 2300 (1)
Hall of Famer
89 10
Prospect
I have thought about this also. Leagues are better with 16. No question. And bad teams can’t become contenders without a lot of luck with 24 teams. Just doomed.
9/1/2024 3:28 PM (edited)
savoybg
Posts: 2317 (0)
All Star
10 24
Prospect
Posted by Lennybruce26 on 9/1/2024 3:28:00 PM (view original):
I have thought about this also. Leagues are better with 16. No question. And bad teams can’t become contenders without a lot of luck with 24 teams. Just doomed.
Yes, 16 would help, but we really need 8 and 12 too. If you want to do a progressive league from the beginning you have to have 8 team leagues, and 12 teams would be ideal for other types of leagues. It would be like half of a current 24 team league.

What kind of company ignores what their customers are asking for?
9/1/2024 6:42 PM
Lennybruce26
Posts: 2300 (1)
Hall of Famer
89 10
Prospect
Posted by savoybg on 9/1/2024 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by Lennybruce26 on 9/1/2024 3:28:00 PM (view original):
I have thought about this also. Leagues are better with 16. No question. And bad teams can’t become contenders without a lot of luck with 24 teams. Just doomed.
Yes, 16 would help, but we really need 8 and 12 too. If you want to do a progressive league from the beginning you have to have 8 team leagues, and 12 teams would be ideal for other types of leagues. It would be like half of a current 24 team league.

What kind of company ignores what their customers are asking for?
I like 8 and 12 also. Anything 16 or less.
9/1/2024 9:33 PM
savoybg
Posts: 2317 (0)
All Star
10 24
Prospect
I'd start a progressive league that would have 8 teams from 1952-1967. Once you get to 1968 the ABA starts so you can go to 16 teams then.
9/1/2024 10:24 PM
◂ Prev 12
WE WANT LEAGUES AVAILABLE WITH FEWER TEAMS THAN 24 Topic
△Top△Bottom

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.