I knew I wouldn't have nearly enough time to build all the teams I would have liked to have tried, in an ideal world. So I developed several assumptions and heuristics to dramatically reduce my search time:
-- With a couple of notable exceptions (e.g. the Ruth/Gehrig Yankees), the major differentiating factor in any given league would be the quality and quantity of starting pitching. I prioritized teams that had 2 elite starters who could (with clones) provide 1000+ high quality innings.
-- Several franchises are notorious for not having nearly enough elite SP across their history - try to pick those franchises first.
-- Look for teams that can provide A+ range at multiple critical positions (2B, SS, OF)
-- Avoid modern teams (1990-2024); several reasons for this, the most significant being the reliance on low-IP/G relief pitchers, who fatigue quickly in WIS and usually underperform. Not that salary matters in this theme, but those RPs are also uniformly overpriced IMO. The most modern team that I have is the 1988 Twins.
-- When possible, and especially toward the later rounds, divisional alignment factored heavily into my decisions.
Round 1:
1915 White Sox, 1903 Pirates
These are two of the worst franchises in history for elite SP. Thankfully, that's not true for the deadball era. The White Sox bring over 1200 elite innings from 1908/1910 Walsh and 1917 Cicotte. Bullpen is very strong with 19 Cicotte, 16 Benz, 15 Wolfgang, and 16 Russell. Offense should rake with clones of Eddie Collins, Joe Jackson, Jack Fournier (one of my WIS favorites), and the 1922 OF version of Reb Russell. Excellent defense for the era. I'll be surprised and disappointed if this team doesn't win 90+ games.
The Pirates pitching is not quite as good, by Cy Falkenberg, Jack Pfiester, Deacon Phillippe, and Sam Leever should do Ok. Clones of Wagner and Fred Clarke anchor the lineup. A+ range at 5 positions. Don't know if we can beat schwarze's 1901 Bucs, but this team should be decent.
Round 2:
1940 Tigers, 1917 Phillies
The Tigers also have execrable SP throughout their history, especially once I took the Verlander/Scherzer teams off the table with my "no modern teams" rule. 1940 gives them 2 Newhousers and 2 Trouts, along with 1946 Rowe as a stud closer. Offenses has clones of York, Greenberg, Gehringer, Averill. A+ range at SS (Bartell). We're in a division with 3 teams that will likely be very similar, so anything above 81 wins will feel like a bonus.
I had to have a Pete Alexander Phillies team. Ultimately went with 1917 because it brought Cravath, Bancroft, Evers, and 1911 Schulte to anchor the offense. They also have Charles (formerly known as "Chief") Bender who turned into a very good 2-man bullpen, as well as excellent defense for the era, with A+ range at SS (both Bancrofts), 1B (the 1910 Paskert has often approached 40 plus plays for me), and good seasons from Stock and Whitted. We lucked into a division with 1930, 1957, 1964 (away from the other Alexanders). I like our chances to win 95+ here.
Round 3:
1921 Indians, 1988 Twins
With the Joss Indians and Johnson Senators largely gone by this point, I needed to pivot. The Indians should still have excellent pitching with Coveleski, Wood, Ray Caldwell, and a number of other guys who would be in the rotation for some of my later selections. Tris Speaker clones anchor a potent offense. I'm expecting close to 400 doubles for this team. Divisional alignment is again our friend as we avoid the Joss teams. kstober's 1922 will probably look very similar, but I like our chances against the 1949-50 clubs.
Once you leave the Johnson-era behind, the Twins pitching for most of their history is execrable for a league of this caliber. In retrospect, I think I should have gone with a Johnson-era club in round 1. But since that was now moot, 1988 lets me use Carlton clones for the first (but not last) time. Combined with Blyleven, a decent Joe Niekro, and the 1981 Reardon, the staff here is about as good as I think you can put together for this franchise - again without Johnson. Unfortunately, this may be the worst offense of any of my 16 teams. How the Twins ever won 2 WS titles in this era is beyond me, and probably says something about the overall quality of play in MLB in the 1980s. We're in a division with 1987 (which I expect will have a very similar roster) and 1970 (the Oliva/Carew tandem will be formidable, and Killebrew clones may hit 20 HR apiece just against my pitching staff), so I don't have high hopes here.
Round 4:
1970 Cardinals, 1959 Reds
Let's do Carlton clones again! With 2 Gibsons, and an offense that includes multiple Torres, Allens, Brocks...got a good divisional draw here - avoided the other Gibson teams. 85+ wins here, i think.
The Reds are...not good. 1959 lets me sneak in clones of Cuellar and Newcombe, The OF can hit, the infield cannot, and we're in a division with 2 of the Big Red Machine teams. We have A+ range at SS and 2 OF spots, but that might not matter when Bench, Perez, Foster, Morgan, et al are taking Newk deep 4-5 times a game...
Round 5:
1973 Orioles, 1959 Braves
Was all set to take a deadball-era Browns team when Pedro grabbed them a few hours before my spot was due up. You guys all know what this team looks like: Palmer, Cuellar, McNally, a decent pen, excellent defense, mediocre offense. We certainly will miss having Frank Robinson in the lineup, but the good news is our divisional draw puts us against 1976, 1981, 1995, so we may sneak into a playoff spot.
You all know the 1959 Braves as well. It's a typical Spahn/Mathews/Aaron team of the era, with a couple of nice additions: Schoedients, Avila, Mickey Vernon, Enos Slaughter. 81 wins would be a success here, but who knows? We're in the NL, so we avoid all the Maddux teams, and the Braves never really had great pitching. That 1917 club with Walsh will be interesting, for sure.
Round 6:
1979 Yankees, 1952 Red Sox
At the time I posted that I love one of these and hate the other. As a diehard Sox fan, it pains me to say that I love the Yankees pick here. But the 79 Yankees are one of my favorite twist teams. Guidry, Tiant, Hunter, Righetti, Gossage... we should easily have the best pitching in our division, and we're in the AL so we miss the Ruth/Gehrig teams entirely. Might be my best team in all of round 1. We'll see.
The 52 Sox absolutely suck. I waited way too long to take a Red Sox team, so this one is just for fun, with the Williams clones and Lou Boudreau holding down the fort at C and SS. The pitching is horrible; we may give up 2000 runs.
Round 7:
1928 Dodgers, 1966 Cubs
I like these Dodgers. The Vance clones, Babe Herman on offense, and A+ range at 5 positions (1B, 2B, SS, 2 OF - hello Max Carey, I see you there). Given the divisional draw, I like our chances.
The Cubs are not good, but lucked into a division with 1933, 1935, 1940. They just might be the best of a weak crop. Banks, Williams, Santo, a nice Harvey Kuenn, Robin Roberts and Fergie on the mound with Abernathy in the pen. If we hit more HR than we give up, we might sneak out a division title with like 83 wins.
Round 8:
1970 A's; 1968 Giants
Nothing special about either team; both are in divisions with almost identical clubs (1967-70 Giants in AL East, 1972/1975 A's join the 1931 Grove/Foxx mosters in the NL West). Not expecting much from either team.
10/22/2024 9:54 AM (edited)