Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 3:33:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 3:10:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:57:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:24:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.
It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.
It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.
Thats because the Dems are the good guys.
If they are so "good", why are so many being busted for sexual harassment? I'm not just talking politics.
Also, I will never consider anyone who condones slaughtering unborn children a good guy. All pro-abortion people are scum to me.
'slaughtering unborn children' pah. I like to think of it as using powers of American and economic freedom!
I agree that people who do abortion are morally questionable, but then again we are, I assume, white men discussing this so it would be best not to.
I truly do think Dems have turned a corner, they will remove anyone accused of harrassment by multiple people.
I have and will always have zero respect for anyone who condones these travesties. It is legal murder. It is not "questionably moral." It is immoral and disgusting.
What if the woman is gonna die if she has the baby?
What if she has been raped?
What if she is a teen who is not ready to financially handle a baby?
I am in the middle on this. Allow first trimester abortion and that is it.
1) very rare case in this instance. I am not going to comment either way. I know for a fact that my wife would give her life so that her baby could live.
2) adoption is a great option. Not the baby's fault that she was raped.
3) adoption is a great option. Not the baby's fault that she chose to have sex before she could afford the baby.
As far as first trimester abortions, you are still killing a living human. The baby's heart starts beating before most women even know they're pregnant.