Fascist ******** posting in force today. Doug and moy giving each other hand jobs

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):
Franken's senate seat up for grabs in 2018 now (rather than 2020)... And if Pawlenty runs.... in a state that almost went for Trump.... and a broke *** DNC defending 24 Senate Seats now.

What a nice surprise for Republicnas.

And you say that 'IT WASN'T A SACRIFICE FOR DEMS'. Jesus Christ, you literally contradict yourself between posts.

Who did he try to ****?

What was her name?

EVERYBODY KNOWS except maybe you. So I want you to tell me.

CLUE #1: SHE WAS AT THE MATT LAUER ROAST IN 2008.

GIMMIE SOMPHIN.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:27:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:19:00 PM (view original):
Franken's senate seat up for grabs in 2018 now (rather than 2020)... And if Pawlenty runs.... in a state that almost went for Trump.... and a broke *** DNC defending 24 Senate Seats now.

What a nice surprise for Republicnas.

And you say that 'IT WASN'T A SACRIFICE FOR DEMS'. Jesus Christ, you literally contradict yourself between posts.

I never said that. It was someone else

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2017 1:51:00 PM (view original):
Who did he try to ****?

What was her name?

EVERYBODY KNOWS except maybe you. So I want you to tell me.

Nancy O'Dell.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by DougOut on 12/10/2017 1:51:00 PM (view original):
Who did he try to ****?

What was her name?

EVERYBODY KNOWS except maybe you. So I want you to tell me.

Nancy O'Dell.

GREAT!

You're getting there. Step by step.

NOW!

What did she say about his attempted RAPE?

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

You take the one thing he did, not the intention. The point was that he tried to **** a married woman, and admitted to kissing and he 'don't even wait'. That is sexual harrassment. SHE. WAS. MARRIED. It also gives credibility to the other accusations against Trump.

Kissing a woman without consent is harrassment.

My point was you draw yourself into a corner to talk about 'explicit proof' with Franken but not with Trump.

Things are going really well for our economy, a subject the Fake News spends as little time as possible discussing! Stock Market hit another RECORD HIGH, unemployment is now at a 17 year low and companies are coming back into the USA. Really good news, and much more to come!

Getting closer and closer on the Tax Cut Bill. Shaping up even better than projected. House and Senate working very hard and smart. End result will be not only important, but SPECIAL!

-Tweeter in Chief letting us know all the stuff the media won't!!!

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 2:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:35:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

It really did not benefit the left to kick Franken out. I agree on the Clinton point but I really do think that in this age the left is sensing a pattern and they have changed.

It most certainly does benefit them. Now a democrat can be appointed to his seat for the rest of the term and the dems can look like good guys for having taken action. If a republican was going to take over his role for the rest of the term he would not have been booted.

Thats because the Dems are the good guys.

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 2:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 2:12:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 1:26:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 12:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 11:48:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 11:46:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tangplay on 12/10/2017 10:37:00 AM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 12/10/2017 8:31:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 12/10/2017 8:13:00 AM (view original):
The left will respond to that with "we kick our sexual abusers out of office", but if you really pay attention they only kick them out when it benefits them. It wasn't until Clinton was of no use to the party anymore, after Hillary lost, that they finally started saying he was trash for what he did.

And they are reluctantly booted out, even after there's PROOF.

I mean, ofc it's reluctant, but 30 SOMETHING DEMOCRATS called for Franken to leave. That's a big deal compared to the Reps actively supporting a President who has been PROVEN to have done sexual misconduct and a Candidate who has been accused by dozens of people.

What PROOF for Trump? Be specific.

And Moore... What PROOF is there other than he said she said (which is not proof)?

Franken had a photo of him sexually harassing tweeden. That's specific.

Conyers had settlement cases paid out for sexual harassment (with tax payer money I may add). Again, specific.

The new one yesterday is Alcee Hastings paid $220k in taxpayers money to settle sexual harassment cases... Another Democrat.

Btw - all these events happened well into the 2000s..... Not in the 1970's

BILLY BUSH TAPE (btw that's better evidence against trump than there is against franken.)

There isn't. But when you have multiple people claiming that I would assume that it is true about Moore. Come on, now, be logical.

Yeah, Democrats have bad stains, but I GUARANTEE YOU all 3 are gonna get removed.

I posted the transcript from the Billy Bush tape. WHO SPECIFICALLY DID TRUMP SEXUALLY HARASS? WHAT LINE(S) SPECIFICALLY INCRIMINATE TRUMP?

Re: Moore - you're right... THERE ISN'T any proof. Lot's of people get accused of things that aren't true... like Kobe Bryant and Patrick Kane of rape... and in the end it's PROVEN untrue. When there is PROOF against Moore I will sing a different tune. Not before that, though.

Re: All 3 dems getting removed... I will tell you why... THERE IS PROOF IN ALL 3 CASES!!!

Trump: I did try and **** her. She was married.

Trump: No, no, Nancy. No, this was [unintelligible] — and I moved on her very heavily. In fact, I took her out furniture shopping.

She wanted to get some furniture. I said, “I’ll show you where they have some nice furniture.” I took her out furniture —

I moved on her like a *****. But I couldn’t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, she’s now got the big phony **** and everything. She’s totally changed her look.

Trump: Yeah, that’s her. With the gold. I better use some Tic Tacs just in case I start kissing her. You know, I’m automatically attracted to beautiful — I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.
Trump: Ooh, nice legs, huh?

All of those quotes from the tape are incriminating.

Also, when dozens of people accuse you of misconduct, you have committed misconduct. What's the border here? If we have a photo or quote, that's incriminating, is that 'proof', but no people are? So by that logic Franken is innocent, right? He does not actually touch the woman in the photo. It was just a 'joke', 10 years ago right? And anything said by someone that is not part of proof is not correct, right? GUYS FRANKEN IS INNOCENT!

Of course he isn't. I draw the line at multiple credible accusers. I think that's where Dems are drawing the line. Drawing the line at 'EXPLICIT PROOF' from Reps proves my point entirely.

So he took her out shopping because he wanted some ***... He defined 'very heavily' as taking her out furniture shopping.... That's not sexual harassment.... And he admitted he never got anywhere with her. That's not admitting sexual harassment.... That's admitting he's a dude. ****, I can't remember a single woman I took shopping on my dime for any reason other than ***.... married or not. In a relationship or not. I've also been a crying shoulder, for a piece of *** down the road. That's called being a dude... it's how relationships begin. Is any man who wants to take a married woman shopping in hopes she will consensually have sex with him sexually harassing the woman in your opinion?

And the rest of the transcript is vulgar, but again.... Not against the law and not, by definition, sexual harassment.

As for franken, by legal definition, he does not have to actually touch her to sexually harass her. I posted the exact law passed by Obama in 2010 already.

You take the one thing he did, not the intention. The point was that he tried to **** a married woman, and admitted to kissing and he 'don't even wait'. That is sexual harrassment. SHE. WAS. MARRIED. It also gives credibility to the other accusations against Trump.

Kissing a woman without consent is harrassment.

My point was you draw yourself into a corner to talk about 'explicit proof' with Franken but not with Trump.

Hitting on a married women is NOT sexual harassment, even if the intention is to get laid. Not even close. Trump took this married woman shopping for high end furniture (she went willingly, correct? Why do you think that was?) and when it didn't end up with sex he admits he gave up on it rather than force the issue.

You're suggesting that every woman who leaves her husband for another man was sexually harassed?

As for your next paragraph... When did Trump admit he kissed anyone, specifically? With no proof of any individuals Trump could be simply embellishing... You would agree Trump embellishes pretty much everything, right?

AND poor little Nancy Odell (my spell) never said Donald Trump tried to **** her.

This beautiful looking woman has a life.

She has long ago found her life mate and continues to enjoy American lifestyle.

There are no pictures or FAKE yearbooks.

She simply heard the tape and was dismayed.