Posted by bronxcheer on 6/8/2018 8:49:00 AM (view original):
Israel, beloved by American Cons and Evangelicals, offers free abortions-on-demand in it's Universal, Socialistic health-care system

Israeli "babies" don't matter much to them.

You complain a lot. Must be a loser Mets fan.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/8/2018 8:43:00 AM (view original):
It does? See I don't know any of these things so how can I possibly opine?

Yes, and they develop limbs at about 8 weeks. There is no logical way to argue that it's not a living human being.

That’s not the argument. The argument is that it’s a human that has to live inside someone and, if that someone doesn’t want it there, that someone’s rights have priority.

I think that is your argument against his argument. So that is the argument. LOL

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/8/2018 8:43:00 AM (view original):
It does? See I don't know any of these things so how can I possibly opine?

Yes, and they develop limbs at about 8 weeks. There is no logical way to argue that it's not a living human being.

That’s not the argument. The argument is that it’s a human that has to live inside someone and, if that someone doesn’t want it there, that someone’s rights have priority.

This is an inhuman argument and the rights of children should always trump someone's comfort level.

I am all for women having equal rights, but the death of children should never be a "right".

Doggone it, CCCP. It's really hard for me to block Bronx's dumbassery if you keep quoting his posts.

By the way, I'm really looking forward to my upcoming Boston trip. I'm definitely going to catch a Sox game and a cape cod league game.

Anyone know how long Dino is suspended for?

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 9:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/8/2018 8:43:00 AM (view original):
It does? See I don't know any of these things so how can I possibly opine?

Yes, and they develop limbs at about 8 weeks. There is no logical way to argue that it's not a living human being.

That’s not the argument. The argument is that it’s a human that has to live inside someone and, if that someone doesn’t want it there, that someone’s rights have priority.

This is an inhuman argument and the rights of children should always trump someone's comfort level.

It’s not “comfort level,” it’s the right to control what happens to your body.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 9:33:00 AM (view original):
Anyone know how long Dino is suspended for?

Nope. Seems like a while.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:38:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 9:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/8/2018 8:43:00 AM (view original):
It does? See I don't know any of these things so how can I possibly opine?

Yes, and they develop limbs at about 8 weeks. There is no logical way to argue that it's not a living human being.

That’s not the argument. The argument is that it’s a human that has to live inside someone and, if that someone doesn’t want it there, that someone’s rights have priority.

This is an inhuman argument and the rights of children should always trump someone's comfort level.

It’s not “comfort level,” it’s the right to control what happens to your body.

Look you are making another argument.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:38:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 9:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/8/2018 9:13:00 AM (view original):

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 8:47:00 AM (view original):

Posted by cccp1014 on 6/8/2018 8:43:00 AM (view original):
It does? See I don't know any of these things so how can I possibly opine?

Yes, and they develop limbs at about 8 weeks. There is no logical way to argue that it's not a living human being.

That’s not the argument. The argument is that it’s a human that has to live inside someone and, if that someone doesn’t want it there, that someone’s rights have priority.

This is an inhuman argument and the rights of children should always trump someone's comfort level.

It’s not “comfort level,” it’s the right to control what happens to your body.

It's the death of an innocent child.

Is there ever a situation where abortion is ok with you?

No, but there are situations where I will put feelings aside. Cry for the child and keep my mouth shut. (I.e. It's the woman's life or the baby's life.) I don't think rape is a good reason. I think in instances of rape, the baby should be born and I wouldn't blame the woman in the least for putting it up for adoption.

I know that my wife would choose the baby's life over her own, but I think it would be unfair to expect every woman to make that same choice.

Posted by bad_luck on 6/7/2018 9:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 6/7/2018 8:49:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/7/2018 5:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 6/7/2018 4:55:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 6/7/2018 4:15:00 PM (view original):
I realize that the world isn’t black and white and there are situations that suck but because we have rights, they exist. Women have the right to decide if someone else can live inside them.

She has that right all the way up to the point she has unprotected sex and then doesn't use available after-sex options either.
Abortion should not be used as a birth control method simply because two people are too lazy and/or too selfish.

A) Birth control isn’t 100%

B) even for a planned pregnancy, health issues might come up during the pregnancy.

I would favor exceptions for B.
What % of abortions do you think those 2 conditions cover? 5 at most?
You agree the other 95% already made their choice?

Who cares? It’s either murder or it isn’t.

Wait, isn't people like the California Liberals who love to claim things aren't always black or white?
You're going to get yourself kicked-out of your wonderful State with all-inclusive comments like that.

FWIW, euthanasia stops a beating heart and I favor allowances for that too.

Posted by strikeout26 on 6/8/2018 9:52:00 AM (view original):
No, but there are situations where I will put feelings aside. Cry for the child and keep my mouth shut. (I.e. It's the woman's life or the baby's life.) I don't think rape is a good reason. I think in instances of rape, the baby should be born and I wouldn't blame the woman in the least for putting it up for adoption.

I know that my wife would choose the baby's life over her own, but I think it would be unfair to expect every woman to make that same choice.

So, in the case where the women’s life is in danger, you’d allow an abortion?