So for those who don't know, I have a pair of adjusted salary per minute metrics I use to evaluate players: one that dramatically lessens the impact of usage in the salary formula, and one that leaves usage alone. I've worked quite a bit on tweaking it over the past couple of years to get a better understanding of salary evaluation and how it translates to player value.
Using the latter - the one that does not lessen usage's impact - Ty has the #2 and #5 players when averaging out their five best seasons. On the same team. Using the former, Ty has the #1 overall guard and, well, Embiid falls way down when you lessen the impact of usage (61).
Of course, this is just one metric, in a vacuum that takes no other team building or coaching concepts into account - ie by no means perfect; no single, all-in-one metric is - but it's still pretty scary. Thankfully, Embiid doesn't play a lot of minutes, but holy ****, man!!!