Posted by MikeT23 on 6/9/2017 1:36:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/9/2017 1:16:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/9/2017 1:13:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/9/2017 1:05:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 6/9/2017 1:04:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 6/9/2017 12:38:00 PM (view original):
Comey said Trump said "I hope you can let this go." I hope for a lot of ****. Regardless of how Fragile Comey felt, it was not a directive. Without a directive, there's no obstruction.
You can hope for stuff all you want, you aren't the President. Directions can be conveyed by people in power even if the words they use are benign.
Expanding on this, there's a reason Trump made sure to completely clear the room. That wasn't an accident. He knew what he was doing. So did Comey.
Sure he did. And that's why there's nothing here. Trump said/Comey said, nothing to prove either of them is lying. Oh, other than the fired guy's notes.
Pretty solid evidence there, eh?
The reputations of each "he" certainly adds credibility to one side. The fact that one was willing to testify under oath adds more credibility. The fact that other people will be able to corroborate that the room was cleared and that the meeting happened will add credibility.
This isn't exactly a tough call when it comes down to who to believe.
LOL.
You just got out of prison for murder. We stumble upon a dead body. Police arrive. I say "He did it."
Guess you're going back to jail, right?
Let me fix your analogy so it lines up a little better, because in your example, it's likely that neither of us actually killed the guy. In the Trump/Comey scenario, one person has to be lying.
There's three of us in a locked jail cell. One is me, recently arrested for murder. You're number 2, in for embezzlement, and number 3 is a dead body. Who's the real suspect here?