Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 11:58:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/10/2014 11:55:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 11:20:00 AM (view original):
You clearly don't understand it. That's ok. No one expects more from you.

Ignore birth control. It's relatively inexpensive, prevents more expensive medical bills, and doesn't really add to the cost of health insurance.

Does the cost of birth control pills for a single male have high marginal utility or low marginal utility with respect to the cost of his healthcare insurance premiums?

You really want to try to bring up other concepts you don't grasp?

I'm down, but I'm also not the one always ******** about people bringing up stuff from past arguments.

Another one of my favorite BL argument tactics.

When unable to rationalize your retarded argument, you get into "you just don't understand it" defensive mode.

Good job.

I explained it. You don't like the explanation. Oh well.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 12:52:00 PM (view original):
I explained it. You don't like the explanation. Oh well.

Good job.

Thanks

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 12:52:00 PM (view original):
I explained it. You don't like the explanation. Oh well.

It's more like "You explained it.  There was no internal consistency to your logic.  We mocked it.  You gave up."

Posted by toddcommish on 7/10/2014 1:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 12:52:00 PM (view original):
I explained it. You don't like the explanation. Oh well.

It's more like "You explained it.  There was no internal consistency to your logic.  We mocked it.  You gave up."

What exactly did you mock?

Posted by tecwrg on 7/9/2014 10:37:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/9/2014 2:48:00 PM (view original):
I think, at this point, you're only arguing against it because it's me, not because you don't like it. Basically, if I say X, you're saying Y, no matter what.

Being on the opposite side of most of your retarded arguments is usually the better path.

LOL.  Missed this gem.

Is badluck, the actual person behind the username, complaining that someone is arguing with him over nothing?

The stupid son of a *****, the actual person behind the username, SPECIFICALLY CREATED A USERNAME TO ARGUE SOCIAL ISSUES ON A SPORTS SIM SITE!!!
You have no grounds to complain about how, why, when someone argues with you.  IT'S WHY YOU'RE ******* HERE111111

You know how I know you can't live without me?

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 2:05:00 PM (view original):

Posted by toddcommish on 7/10/2014 1:57:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/10/2014 12:52:00 PM (view original):
I explained it. You don't like the explanation. Oh well.

It's more like "You explained it.  There was no internal consistency to your logic.  We mocked it.  You gave up."

What exactly did you mock?

Do you have so little self-awareness that you honestly don't know or can't tell that you're being mocked 99% of the time?

Good job.

I know you and mike are trying to mock me. Retards trying to mock me isn't sonething worth worrying about. I'm asking todd, who, as far as I know, hasn't participated in the thread in days, what he mocked.

TRYING to mock you?

You haven't been terribly successful, so, yeah. Trying.

Oh sorry, I momentarily forgot about your lack of self-awareness.

Won't happen again.

Your meme spelled "Loses an argument.  Tells other person "You just don't understand"" wrong.