Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 4:27:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 4:25:00 PM (view original):
Not Jesus(pronounced Hey-zeus) who lives on the corner, the other one.  The Son of God. 
Yeah him.  He was banging Peter.
And with this, the jrd bus has officially driven over the cliff and crashed and burned in a fiery explosion.
5/11/2012 5:02 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 4:07:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/11/2012 3:50:00 PM (view original):
I'm not interested, so I won't do that.  But you seem to speak with a lot of conviction in your posts.  I assumed, wrongfully it seems, that you could back up your statements with facts and references.
OK.  So then what's your point?

Incest is illegal.  Being gay isn't.
Still waiting for your point tec.  Assuming you had one.
5/11/2012 5:13 PM
I'm waiting for you to tell me on what grounds is incest illegal.  Is it on moral grounds?
5/11/2012 7:37 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 4:04:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 3:55:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 3:41:00 PM (view original):
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 3:35:00 PM (view original):
I'm spending a lot of time yanking your chain.    You've looked foolish and it has been amusing. 
You spent ten pages arguing about something you don't have an opinion on. I think we know who looks foolish here. Hint: his name starts with M and rhymes with miket23.
I've pointed out, repeatedly, what I'm arguing.

JRDX:  Banning SSM is not constitutional!!
Me:  Yet they're doing it.
JRDX:  Compelling legal reasons!!
Me:  Don't know but it's happening.
JRDX:  It's illegal!!
Me:  OK.  But it's still happening.
Another post, still without an opinion.  I haven't been around here for that long, but I'm guessing this has to be some kind of record, right?
Maybe the fact that he is speaking unopinionated is why you're losing so bad. Because you can't bash his POV. 
5/11/2012 7:40 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 5/11/2012 7:37:00 PM (view original):
I'm waiting for you to tell me on what grounds is incest illegal.  Is it on moral grounds?
I have no idea.  You're the one who brought up incest.  You tell me.
5/11/2012 7:42 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 7:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/11/2012 7:37:00 PM (view original):
I'm waiting for you to tell me on what grounds is incest illegal.  Is it on moral grounds?
I have no idea.  You're the one who brought up incest.  You tell me.
Seriously? Why would they ban incest if it weren't on moral grounds?

That arguing technique is called a "rhetorical question." I believe you will learn about it once you reach 5th grade. 
5/11/2012 7:46 PM
Posted by caesari on 5/11/2012 7:46:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 7:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 5/11/2012 7:37:00 PM (view original):
I'm waiting for you to tell me on what grounds is incest illegal.  Is it on moral grounds?
I have no idea.  You're the one who brought up incest.  You tell me.
Seriously? Why would they ban incest if it weren't on moral grounds?

That arguing technique is called a "rhetorical question." I believe you will learn about it once you reach 5th grade. 
OK.  So what if it is illegal on moral grounds?  I've never argued that laws don't have a basis in morality.

But we don't allow brothers and sisters to marry because incest is illegal.

Being gay isn't illegal.
5/11/2012 7:51 PM
The Bible says it's immoral.   A lot of people believe in the Bible, no?
5/11/2012 8:09 PM
Yeah it does and a lot of people do believe in the bible. What's your point?
5/11/2012 8:14 PM
A lot of people would say being gay is immoral.     If incest is based on morality and laws are based on morality, some people might argue being gay should be illegal.   You know based on the moral/legal precedent you're setting.
5/11/2012 8:27 PM
But being gay isn't illegal.
5/11/2012 8:32 PM
Posted by tecwrg on 5/11/2012 7:37:00 PM (view original):
I'm waiting for you to tell me on what grounds is incest illegal.  Is it on moral grounds?
Prohibitions on incest are nearly culturally universal. If you want to know why, don't look to the Bible. Look to a genetics textbook or watch Deliverance.
5/11/2012 8:36 PM
Posted by toddcommish on 4/17/2012 1:52:00 PM (view original):
Posted by tecwrg on 4/16/2012 11:20:00 AM (view original):
Posted by micki on 4/16/2012 10:54:00 AM (view original):
ah well I think you are all a bunch of idiots. Griping about the current state of affairs and our President.  Thats what they want and thats how they stay in power - keep you simple minded Americans argueing  amoungst yourselves so that no one goes and looks behind the curtain as to who is really pulling the strings.

I said it 3 years a go and I'll say it again IT DON'T MATTER WHO GETS TO BE PRESIDENT, NOTHING WILL CHANGE.
Fine.  Then no problem with voting Obama out of office in November, right?
Vote for MikeT/Tec in 2012!
5/11/2012 8:38 PM
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 8:32:00 PM (view original):
But being gay isn't illegal.
Incest is considered immoral largely due to the Bible.   Homosexuality is considered immoral by the Bible.

I think sodomy is illegal in some states.    How do gay dudes get it on?
5/11/2012 8:45 PM
Posted by MikeT23 on 5/11/2012 8:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jrd_x on 5/11/2012 8:32:00 PM (view original):
But being gay isn't illegal.
Incest is considered immoral largely due to the Bible.   Homosexuality is considered immoral by the Bible.

I think sodomy is illegal in some states.    How do gay dudes get it on?
sodomy laws were ruled unconstitutional and overturned by the supreme court not too long ago.
5/11/2012 8:52 PM
◂ Prev 1...22|23|24|25|26...462 Next ▸
Obama: Worst President Ever? Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.