Mike should never be blocked, just ignored

Posted by RCBracco on 5/2/2017 7:13:00 PM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 5/2/2017 5:23:00 PM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 5/2/2017 11:19:00 AM (view original):

Posted by all3 on 5/2/2017 9:26:00 AM (view original):
Still waiting Bracco. You gonna answer or just keep avoiding?

Posted by RCBracco on 5/1/2017 2:23:00 PM (view original):
Hey all3, I did not twist Dumps words about the constitution, I quoted them verbatim. You are an ignorant piece of **** and not capable of any thought that is not part of the party line.

If you really did fight so hard for this Country (which we have to doubt, given your own past admission that everything you post may or may not be true), why are you so willing to give it away to people who have done nothing to deserve it, including those who have committed a crime against it by entering illegally?

I had no idea you were asking a question. Now explain that question if you will or show me where I said I was willing to do what you appear to be accusing me of

I know English is difficult for you to understand, so I'll try to simplify - oops, I mean make the question as easy as I can, for you.
If you really spent a part of your life defending this Country and it's values, why are you so willing to let people from other Countries illegally enter, or give those here but too lazy to work assistance - oops, I mean help, that they don't deserve? I would think someone who so vigorously defends this Country would have more respect for the laws and values that so many have held dear for so long.

Again, where did I ever say that I was in favor of that? I know it is hard for a high school drop out to understand but do give it a try or else shut up

WTF are you saying moron?
You support the Liberals and try to bash the Conservatives every chance you get (even when there's nothing to bash).
HTH can you support those Liberals but hate their position on things?
You know they want to let illegals stay in the Country and allow more immigrants from known terrorist Countries, right?
I know you're slow, but come'on man. You're making as much sense as b_l. Maybe trying some b_l double-talk because you're now caught in your own stupidity?

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/2/2017 8:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 7:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/2/2017 6:39:00 PM (view original):
Because Hillary was a good option? Bernie Sanders? Ted Cruz?

Yes

Sorry, I forgot. You're officially a retard.

My apologies.

Relative Trump, those are all good options. Again, you asked. Not my fault you can't handle the answer.

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 11:02:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/2/2017 8:00:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 7:08:00 PM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 5/2/2017 6:39:00 PM (view original):
Because Hillary was a good option? Bernie Sanders? Ted Cruz?

Yes

Sorry, I forgot. You're officially a retard.

My apologies.

Relative Trump, those are all good options. Again, you asked. Not my fault you can't handle the answer.

None of them are good options. Only Trump is going to make America great again!!! That's why he won and sour grapes BL is calling all those that voted for him an idiot. Who can't handle the answer.... GIVE ME A B! GIVE ME AN L!

Posted by RCBracco on 5/2/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):
I figure about 3 million votes less then anyone else running. The system sucks and your president is inept

"The system sucks . . . ".
Isn't that what Trumped tried to tell you and everyone else BEFORE the election?
Now you agree with him. Maybe you should stop trying to p!ssing and moan about every single thing he does simply because he belongs to the other Party and you'd see that he's right about a lot more.

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 12:26:00 PM (view original):
Wow, I missed so much in just a few hours.

moy - nothing in that mclatchy link says it was the economy. Which makes sense considering unemployment was at <5% when the election happened.

mike - of course we want the president to fix the problem. Obama was. The economy was turning around and did end up turning around completely. Also, Obama didn't spend 8 years blaming Bush for everything but we, as a country, will always point to the Bush administration when discussing the recession that started at the end of 2007. That's different than Trump promising to do a **** load of stuff in his first 100 days, doing almost none of it, and then blaming everyone else for his inability to get it done.

tec - I don't think anyone knows exactly why Clinton lost. But I am sure that anyone who points to one and only one reason is wrong. My guess is that she lost due to a combination of things. And yes, that combination includes (but is not limited to) sexism, Comey, and Russia.

all3 - you are correct that we treat stupid people differently than smart people but stupid people do not get to claim that they are a minority. Even if you feel like we're mean to you because of it.

Hillary lost because she was an incredibly unlikable and untrustworthy candidate, refused to acknowledge and get out in front of that, and campaigned as if her election was a foregone conclusion.

The fact the she (and others, such as you) are still making excuses and blaming others ("Russia!!!", "Comey!!!", "Mysogeny!!!") for her loss is both sad and laughable at the same time.

Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.

Posted by all3 on 5/3/2017 8:29:00 AM (view original):

Posted by RCBracco on 5/2/2017 3:13:00 PM (view original):
I figure about 3 million votes less then anyone else running. The system sucks and your president is inept

"The system sucks . . . ".
Isn't that what Trumped tried to tell you and everyone else BEFORE the election?
Now you agree with him. Maybe you should stop trying to p!ssing and moan about every single thing he does simply because he belongs to the other Party and you'd see that he's right about a lot more.

Trump was indeed saying that, meanwhile let's not forget Democrats were bragging about Hillary's electoral 'Firewall' that included Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan.

Posted by tecwrg on 5/3/2017 8:43:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 12:26:00 PM (view original):
Wow, I missed so much in just a few hours.

moy - nothing in that mclatchy link says it was the economy. Which makes sense considering unemployment was at <5% when the election happened.

mike - of course we want the president to fix the problem. Obama was. The economy was turning around and did end up turning around completely. Also, Obama didn't spend 8 years blaming Bush for everything but we, as a country, will always point to the Bush administration when discussing the recession that started at the end of 2007. That's different than Trump promising to do a **** load of stuff in his first 100 days, doing almost none of it, and then blaming everyone else for his inability to get it done.

tec - I don't think anyone knows exactly why Clinton lost. But I am sure that anyone who points to one and only one reason is wrong. My guess is that she lost due to a combination of things. And yes, that combination includes (but is not limited to) sexism, Comey, and Russia.

all3 - you are correct that we treat stupid people differently than smart people but stupid people do not get to claim that they are a minority. Even if you feel like we're mean to you because of it.

Hillary lost because she was an incredibly unlikable and untrustworthy candidate, refused to acknowledge and get out in front of that, and campaigned as if her election was a foregone conclusion.

The fact the she (and others, such as you) are still making excuses and blaming others ("Russia!!!", "Comey!!!", "Mysogeny!!!") for her loss is both sad and laughable at the same time.

Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.

Saw an interview with Hillary. She says she takes full responsibility for losing the election then spends the rest of the interview blaming others for her loss.

BL-level self-awareness there.

Speaking out of both sides of her mouth.

Just like BL.

Posted by tecwrg on 5/3/2017 8:43:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 5/2/2017 12:26:00 PM (view original):
Wow, I missed so much in just a few hours.

moy - nothing in that mclatchy link says it was the economy. Which makes sense considering unemployment was at <5% when the election happened.

mike - of course we want the president to fix the problem. Obama was. The economy was turning around and did end up turning around completely. Also, Obama didn't spend 8 years blaming Bush for everything but we, as a country, will always point to the Bush administration when discussing the recession that started at the end of 2007. That's different than Trump promising to do a **** load of stuff in his first 100 days, doing almost none of it, and then blaming everyone else for his inability to get it done.

tec - I don't think anyone knows exactly why Clinton lost. But I am sure that anyone who points to one and only one reason is wrong. My guess is that she lost due to a combination of things. And yes, that combination includes (but is not limited to) sexism, Comey, and Russia.

all3 - you are correct that we treat stupid people differently than smart people but stupid people do not get to claim that they are a minority. Even if you feel like we're mean to you because of it.

Hillary lost because she was an incredibly unlikable and untrustworthy candidate, refused to acknowledge and get out in front of that, and campaigned as if her election was a foregone conclusion.

The fact the she (and others, such as you) are still making excuses and blaming others ("Russia!!!", "Comey!!!", "Mysogeny!!!") for her loss is both sad and laughable at the same time.

Those who do not learn from the mistakes of the past are doomed to repeat them.

I don't think anyone who is being honest would deny that Clinton and her campaign bear a significant amount of responsibility for losing. I also think it's dishonest to deny that, for example, Comey coming out with a letter about a "new" investigation didn't impact the race at the very last minute.

Considering she she won the popular vote, I don't think Clinton was fundamentally unlikable or unelectable.

Well, she won the popular vote in California. A state that elects actors as governors. She lost the popular vote in the other 49 states. Where she was fundamentally unlikable and unelectable.

I mean, SOMEBODY had to win the popular vote. Do you think she would have won the popular vote if the Republicans had put up a more "mainstream" candidate, such as 2012 Romney or 2008 McCain? She got a lot of votes solely because Trump scared the **** out of a lot of people.

Posted by tecwrg on 5/3/2017 9:51:00 AM (view original):
Well, she won the popular vote in California. A state that elects actors as governors. She lost the popular vote in the other 49 states. Where she was fundamentally unlikable and unelectable.

You don't just get to remove the largest state like it doesn't matter.

Posted by tecwrg on 5/3/2017 9:51:00 AM (view original):
Well, she won the popular vote in California. A state that elects actors as governors. She lost the popular vote in the other 49 states. Where she was fundamentally unlikable and unelectable.

And I thought Ronny was chosen by God so you cons could have your own saint!