Lets debate! Topic

Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:31:00 PM (view original):
so, why can a restaurant post a sign saying "no shoes, no shirt, no service"? and why can a bar choose to not serve someone? Why should that baker have to abandon his religious beliefs? He's not telling the same sex couple they can't be gay, just that he doesn't have to make a cake for them
You can't discriminate on the basis of religion, race, color, sex, or national origin, at least under federal law. Some states have broader laws.

Someone without a shirt isn't a protected class.
bars and restaurants always have signs saying they can refuse service to anyone they choose not to serve. Why is that okay?
1/29/2019 6:42 PM
A bartender can refuse to serve people.
1/29/2019 6:42 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/29/2019 6:35:00 PM (view original):
The author also has a bookstore in which he sells his books with a store front. They are right next to each other.
If anyone can walk into the bookstore and buy a custom book, then no, the person producing the custom books can't discriminate. Retail stores can't discriminate.
But why should an author or a baker have to produce a product/service that violates their conscience?
1/29/2019 6:43 PM
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:31:00 PM (view original):
so, why can a restaurant post a sign saying "no shoes, no shirt, no service"? and why can a bar choose to not serve someone? Why should that baker have to abandon his religious beliefs? He's not telling the same sex couple they can't be gay, just that he doesn't have to make a cake for them
You can't discriminate on the basis of religion, race, color, sex, or national origin, at least under federal law. Some states have broader laws.

Someone without a shirt isn't a protected class.
bars and restaurants always have signs saying they can refuse service to anyone they choose not to serve. Why is that okay?
How many times do I have to repeat?

Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
1/29/2019 6:43 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:39:00 PM (view original):
still haven't seen an explanation for why a restaurant or a bar(both public accomodations, by the way) can refuse service to anyone they choose, but a baker can't.
Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
But this would have been a lie, which is also a sin in Christianity. So, your solution is that he should have lied instead of being truthful?
1/29/2019 6:44 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:39:00 PM (view original):
still haven't seen an explanation for why a restaurant or a bar(both public accomodations, by the way) can refuse service to anyone they choose, but a baker can't.
Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
so, he should have just lied and said he was refusing service to them because he felt like it, and it had nothing to do with their sexual orientation?
1/29/2019 6:44 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/29/2019 6:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:39:00 PM (view original):
still haven't seen an explanation for why a restaurant or a bar(both public accomodations, by the way) can refuse service to anyone they choose, but a baker can't.
Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
But this would have been a lie, which is also a sin in Christianity. So, your solution is that he should have lied instead of being truthful?
I'm not offering him a solution. I'm stating a fact. A public accommodation refusing service on the basis of religion or sex is illegal.
1/29/2019 6:45 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:31:00 PM (view original):
so, why can a restaurant post a sign saying "no shoes, no shirt, no service"? and why can a bar choose to not serve someone? Why should that baker have to abandon his religious beliefs? He's not telling the same sex couple they can't be gay, just that he doesn't have to make a cake for them
You can't discriminate on the basis of religion, race, color, sex, or national origin, at least under federal law. Some states have broader laws.

Someone without a shirt isn't a protected class.
bars and restaurants always have signs saying they can refuse service to anyone they choose not to serve. Why is that okay?
How many times do I have to repeat?

Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
like strikeout says, forget about the law. Why does that make sense?
1/29/2019 6:45 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:31:00 PM (view original):
so, why can a restaurant post a sign saying "no shoes, no shirt, no service"? and why can a bar choose to not serve someone? Why should that baker have to abandon his religious beliefs? He's not telling the same sex couple they can't be gay, just that he doesn't have to make a cake for them
You can't discriminate on the basis of religion, race, color, sex, or national origin, at least under federal law. Some states have broader laws.

Someone without a shirt isn't a protected class.
bars and restaurants always have signs saying they can refuse service to anyone they choose not to serve. Why is that okay?
How many times do I have to repeat?

Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
Being gay is none of the adjectives you listed. So by your own logic they can be denied.
1/29/2019 6:45 PM
Lol great minds think alike, Wylie, We posted the same thing at the same time.
1/29/2019 6:45 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/29/2019 6:45:00 PM (view original):
Lol great minds think alike, Wylie, We posted the same thing at the same time.
Yep! LOL
1/29/2019 6:46 PM
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/29/2019 6:44:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:39:00 PM (view original):
still haven't seen an explanation for why a restaurant or a bar(both public accomodations, by the way) can refuse service to anyone they choose, but a baker can't.
Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
But this would have been a lie, which is also a sin in Christianity. So, your solution is that he should have lied instead of being truthful?
I'm not offering him a solution. I'm stating a fact. A public accommodation refusing service on the basis of religion or sex is illegal.
Its not sex it’s based on values and maybe the baker is anti sodomy. Idk. Sex means he won’t serve women or
men. That is not the case.
1/29/2019 6:46 PM
Posted by cccp1014 on 1/29/2019 6:45:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:43:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:42:00 PM (view original):
Posted by bad_luck on 1/29/2019 6:38:00 PM (view original):
Posted by wylie715 on 1/29/2019 6:31:00 PM (view original):
so, why can a restaurant post a sign saying "no shoes, no shirt, no service"? and why can a bar choose to not serve someone? Why should that baker have to abandon his religious beliefs? He's not telling the same sex couple they can't be gay, just that he doesn't have to make a cake for them
You can't discriminate on the basis of religion, race, color, sex, or national origin, at least under federal law. Some states have broader laws.

Someone without a shirt isn't a protected class.
bars and restaurants always have signs saying they can refuse service to anyone they choose not to serve. Why is that okay?
How many times do I have to repeat?

Any business can refuse service to anyone as long as they aren't basing the refusal on religion, race, sex, color, or national origin.

If the baker told the couple he was too busy to make any more cakes (or whatever), he would have been in the clear.
Being gay is none of the adjectives you listed. So by your own logic they can be denied.
Right now, for the sake of simplicity, I'm limiting the scope to federal law. Some states expand civil rights protections to sexual orientation.
1/29/2019 6:47 PM
Once again, i'm not talking about laws. I'm discussing what is fair and proper in a free society. Somehow we keep circling back around to laws.
1/29/2019 6:48 PM
Posted by strikeout26 on 1/29/2019 6:41:00 PM (view original):
You keep using the laws to justify your answers. Take legality out of equation. Anyone reasonable can admit that there are/have been unjust laws and that laws can come with unintended consequences. This isn't a courtroom.
There have absolutely been unjust laws. I don't believe that civil rights protections fall into that category.
1/29/2019 6:49 PM
◂ Prev 1...14|15|16|17|18...229 Next ▸
Lets debate! Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2025 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.