Jung is, of course, an inner-circle HOF'er, no discussion needed there. Incredible player.
Margot a rockstar as well; my personal bar for closers is pretty high but he clears it, elite and dominant for a long period and got to ALMOST 1,000 innings. (McDougal does not, and the innings load - barely 750 - does play a big part in that)
Phil Searle is a fascinating case - not enough AB's - the counting stats just aren't there compared to pretty much any other HOF'er - but amazing offense and he at least faked 2b, CF, and 3B for stretches of his career. But even being a LF'er gives him positive positional value.
Leonys Nieves DOES have those counting stats, and rate stats that are essentially the same as Searle's. He played a pretty decent 1b so at least he wasn't a DH but not a ton of additional value there. IN general, he's the kind of player we want to stay away from because he's just another 1B bat - but he was a REALLY good 1B bat, .308/.391/.575 (.966 OPS overall).
Blair is basically Nieves but if he wasn't as good, and played a crappy LF instead of a good 1B. Can't see ever putting him in over Nieves, and I'm sorta meh on him overall.
Viriato! Rockstar pitcher (signed for something like $12 mil if I recall, one of the last great IFA steals in this world), a truly elite pitcher for a long time - suffered on the win totals but pretty much everything else is there.
I really like George Paul and that speed but an .866 OPS for a pure 1B is hard to put up against guys like Nieves and even Blair. The SB's are obviously important, and he hung around a LONG time so those counting stats (2800 hits!) are nice. BUt I think he's probably a discussion for another year, though the power/speed combo will always get him quick-glance votes.
In my mind, we'd do Jung and Margot as the locks, with Nieves and Viriato as recommends, and Searle as kinda same as last year, an interesting case, and can say "the committee also discussed McDougal, Paul, Blair..." kind of thing.