I think this is the correct link. I will eventually add more tabs (with stats on the various leagues).

STANDINGS LINK

This doc does not update automatically. I will try to remember to update this after every session, but I can't promise I won't miss an update (or be a little late).

says access must be requested.

I changed the setting so anybody with the link should be able to access it now. Sorry about that.

Borrowed last year's template and forgot to change the header.

Although, if everybody was at $255, that would explain why my 140M team is on a pace to lose 120+ games.

what do the numbers mean on tab 1 next to each team name? Seem to range from 3 to 17.

Number of wins by each team

Posted by schwarze on 6/8/2024 3:17:00 PM (view original):
Borrowed last year's template and forgot to change the header.

Although, if everybody was at $255, that would explain why my 140M team is on a pace to lose 120+ games.

My thoughts exactly with a couple of my teams. Am I in the wrong league...hahah

The standings doc will only be updated once a day while I am in Vegas. Day #1, I had a 13-hour poker session.

I'm excited for the "unluckiest team" post, where 4-5 of mine are no doubt in the Top 10.

72 player field has proven to be making the competition tougher, 93.5 wins per 162 average is leading after 54 games, in past years I recall it being at 100 win pace at least.

15 wins from 25th to 1st is extremely tight.

For those who haven't noticed, I have added "Data" tabs for the 70M, 80M and 100M themes. Some interesting trends developing. For example, the teams that drafted lots of SBs (400+) are doing better collectively than the teams that stayed close to 300.

I did notice hat Schwarze...thanks for doing that, interesting. I noticed I have a low cookie score which means I obviously missed the train somewhere, also noticing in the 70m league, the teams that went for the most innings are not good...wondering if the lower IP guys will fatigue out later...also that high Winning percents on the very recent teams....Are the 2000+ teams undervalued vs. historically? Meaning you get more bang for your buck? I cannot remember, when did the dynamic salary stuff begin/end... if it was before 2018 or so, thta would explain why the DeGroms and others are NOT totally unaffordable like many historical common cookies.

I consider it a milestone that my name finally appears on the screen when I open the link (at the very bottom, tied for 29th, but who's quibbling?)

Posted by schwarze on 6/23/2024 4:26:00 PM (view original):
For those who haven't noticed, I have added "Data" tabs for the 70M, 80M and 100M themes. Some interesting trends developing. For example, the teams that drafted lots of SBs (400+) are doing better collectively than the teams that stayed close to 300.

Added tabs for 110 and 120 million themes.