Posted by jrd_x on 6/22/2012 4:38:00 PM (view original):
Now you're just being dense on purpose. For such an old ****, you sure are good at bad faith arguments. No one is arguing that inflation is a great long term solution.

Government debt is a long term problem too, but in the short term, large cuts to spending would be disastrous for the economy.

And you're being dense because it's just your nature?

Well the long-term corrosive effects are easily offset by the short-term benefits of the poor eating from garbage bins. 

Keynesian ecnomics has NEVER worked anywhere, anytime, anyhow.....EVER....What makes anyone think they can make it work now?  It really has to be genetics.  I am going to apply for a govt. grant to prove my point.....3 mil ought to work.

Posted by tecwrg on 6/22/2012 4:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jrd_x on 6/22/2012 4:38:00 PM (view original):
Now you're just being dense on purpose. For such an old ****, you sure are good at bad faith arguments. No one is arguing that inflation is a great long term solution.

Government debt is a long term problem too, but in the short term, large cuts to spending would be disastrous for the economy.

And you're being dense because it's just your nature?

Look dude, I understand that you've backed yourself into a corner and, even if you agree with me, you can't admit it now.  You've produced no argument whatsoever that I'm wrong and I've produced several opinions from respected economists, nobel prize winners, ivy league professors, and former Bush advisers that further expansion of monetary policy is necessary to bring down unemployment.  You even agreed that expansionary monetary policy is necessary.

I get where you're coming from, that you ridiculously argued for 80 pages that allowing gay marriage would be the end of the institution of marriage, and now the only way to save face is to continue to dig your heels in a try to make me look like the ridiculous one.  I'm sure swamphawk and cracketoaha agree with you.

But we can have a reasonable conversation about this if you want to.

OH yeah, x, you may want to look that one up too as I think that new term introduced probably confused you.......you moron....

Forbes is a lefty blog?
Wall St Journal?
Former Bush adviser Greg Mankiw?

Yes, some of my sources are liberal, but others are conservative.

Jrd, what you're failing to recognize is that manipulating inflation to fix or offset some stupid Obamanomic policy is merely trading long-term problems.  The Fed is trying to play catch-up to repair damage done by Obamanomics.  And the "long-term corrosive effects" of playing catch-up will manifest itself in more economic problems down the road.

If Obama would abandon his BIG GOVERNMENT platforms and reduce some social programs (rather than pander to Mexican voters), perhaps the Fed won't have to resort to such drastic measures to re-invigorate a ****** economy that was started by Bush and exacerbated by Obama.

Wasting your time Todd.......kids an idiot.

Posted by toddcommish on 6/22/2012 6:24:00 PM (view original):
Jrd, what you're failing to recognize is that manipulating inflation to fix or offset some stupid Obamanomic policy is merely trading long-term problems.  The Fed is trying to play catch-up to repair damage done by Obamanomics.  And the "long-term corrosive effects" of playing catch-up will manifest itself in more economic problems down the road.

If Obama would abandon his BIG GOVERNMENT platforms and reduce some social programs (rather than pander to Mexican voters), perhaps the Fed won't have to resort to such drastic measures to re-invigorate a ****** economy that was started by Bush and exacerbated by Obama.

You're talking in such generalities it's difficult to address your point.

What "stupid obamanomic policy" are you talking about?  The collapse of demand that happened before he was elected?

How exactly would reducing spending on social programs improve the economy?

See what I mean.......just answering questions with questions....kids an idiot.

Genetics.

Posted by jrd_x on 6/22/2012 5:28:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 6/22/2012 4:43:00 PM (view original):

Posted by jrd_x on 6/22/2012 4:38:00 PM (view original):
Now you're just being dense on purpose. For such an old ****, you sure are good at bad faith arguments. No one is arguing that inflation is a great long term solution.

Government debt is a long term problem too, but in the short term, large cuts to spending would be disastrous for the economy.

And you're being dense because it's just your nature?

Look dude, I understand that you've backed yourself into a corner and, even if you agree with me, you can't admit it now.  You've produced no argument whatsoever that I'm wrong and I've produced several opinions from respected economists, nobel prize winners, ivy league professors, and former Bush advisers that further expansion of monetary policy is necessary to bring down unemployment.  You even agreed that expansionary monetary policy is necessary.

I get where you're coming from, that you ridiculously argued for 80 pages that allowing gay marriage would be the end of the institution of marriage, and now the only way to save face is to continue to dig your heels in a try to make me look like the ridiculous one.  I'm sure swamphawk and cracketoaha agree with you.

But we can have a reasonable conversation about this if you want to.

It's totally hilarious to read that you think that I (or others) are trying to make you look ridiculous.

You've been doing a fine job of that yourself.  You don't need my (or anybody else's) help.

Looks like we finally shut him up....if only it were that easy with reid and pelosi.