Posted by bad_luck on 1/21/2016 10:29:00 AM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 1/21/2016 7:25:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/20/2016 10:42:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 1/20/2016 7:53:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 1/20/2016 7:49:00 PM (view original):
I have yet to see a single "study" on climate change that attempts to coalesce the "man made" causes with the known science about the earth's orbit and wobble in it's axis, which would be the biggest factors in planetary climate change.

Perhaps you'd be so kind as to share one.

Wait. Are you a physicist? How do you know that those would be the biggest factors in climate change?

Did you answer this?

Do I need to?

http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/154612/

So, in your opinion, all of climate change science, NASA, NOAA, etc. are all just ignoring that?

http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/GlobalWarming/page4.php

Is Current Warming Natural?

In Earth’s history before the Industrial Revolution, Earth’s climate changed due to natural causes not related to human activity. Most often, global climate has changed because of variations in sunlight. Tiny wobbles in Earth’s orbit altered when and where sunlight falls on Earth’s surface. Variations in the Sun itself have alternately increased and decreased the amount of solar energy reaching Earth. Volcanic eruptions have generated particles that reflect sunlight, brightening the planet and cooling the climate. Volcanic activity has also, in the deep past, increased greenhouse gases over millions of years, contributing to episodes of global warming.

 

These natural causes are still in play today, but their influence is too small or they occur too slowly to explain the rapid warming seen in recent decades. We know this because scientists closely monitor the natural and human activities that influence climate with a fleet of satellites and surface instruments.
...
Scientists theorize that there may be a multi-decadal trend in solar output, though if one exists, it has not been observed as yet. Even if the Sun were getting brighter, however, the pattern of warming observed on Earth since 1950 does not match the type of warming the Sun alone would cause. When the Sun’s energy is at its peak (solar maxima), temperatures in both the lower atmosphere (troposphere) and the upper atmosphere (stratosphere) become warmer. Instead, observations show the pattern expected from greenhouse gas effects: Earth’s surface and troposphere have warmed, but the stratosphere has cooled.

Posted by moy23 on 1/21/2016 4:58:00 PM (view original):
seriously... no one cares about global warming except crackpots and tec.

Posted by bad_luck on 1/21/2016 5:15:00 PM (view original):

Posted by moy23 on 1/21/2016 4:58:00 PM (view original):
seriously... no one cares about global warming except crackpots and tec.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2015_United_Nations_Climate_Change_Conference

Posted by bad_luck on 1/21/2016 5:45:00 PM (view original):
Lol

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/21/2016 5:03:00 PM (view original):
tec and BL like to argue about nothing.    Current argument is:   Which one flies away first?

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/20/2016 7:55:00 PM (view original):
I certainly don't study those who are put to death but aren't they all pretty horrible human beings?  

How can you be pro-choice and anti-death penalty?      After all, I dbubt the fetus has harmed anyone while I'm almost positive, when you're issued the death penalty, that you have. 

Posted by raucous on 1/22/2016 8:34:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/20/2016 7:55:00 PM (view original):
I certainly don't study those who are put to death but aren't they all pretty horrible human beings?  

How can you be pro-choice and anti-death penalty?      After all, I dbubt the fetus has harmed anyone while I'm almost positive, when you're issued the death penalty, that you have. 

It is just the Democrats' War on children...which they are winning by slaughtering around 750,000 (2012 data) of them per year. (700k + CA, NH, and MD who don't report their numbers).

Posted by bad_luck on 1/22/2016 10:01:00 AM (view original):

Posted by raucous on 1/22/2016 8:34:00 AM (view original):

Posted by MikeT23 on 1/20/2016 7:55:00 PM (view original):
I certainly don't study those who are put to death but aren't they all pretty horrible human beings?  

How can you be pro-choice and anti-death penalty?      After all, I dbubt the fetus has harmed anyone while I'm almost positive, when you're issued the death penalty, that you have. 

It is just the Democrats' War on children...which they are winning by slaughtering around 750,000 (2012 data) of them per year. (700k + CA, NH, and MD who don't report their numbers).

Being anti-death penalty is a "war on children?"