Posted by bad_luck on 2/13/2015 5:00:00 PM (view original):
I choose "or don't." It's pointless.
The definition of marriage already includes gay couples.
FAIL
Dude! You need to get going. I'm about ready to take away your man card.
You don't define because either you can't or you're lazy. Or both. Don't post if you can't back it. You got no cred here.
And the definition of marriage doesn't include gays. I just read the dictionary and it's not there.
The definition of marriage hasn't changed for millenniums because because it was never necessary. Hence the term "traditional."
Gays have been living together since pretty much the beginning of mankind.
The union of a man and a woman is different from 2 of the same sex. Hijack the word if you want but they will never be the same.
Repeat your mantra over and over until you convince yourself there is no difference. But there it is. Right in front of your lying eyes.
A man and a woman is different from 2 of the same. We all see it and know it and process it. If we didn't, there would be no debate.
I suspect you'll get your way. I'll be the first to spearhead a move to come up with a new word that explains the obvious.