He's probably too stupid. Surprisingly the lone comment on that article was coherent.
"It doesn't really matter where you come down on the grand jury decision on the Michael Brown case; comparing it to this case makes very little sense. Those who are angry about the Brown case--or the Eric Garner case, or the Tamar Rice case, or the Akai Gurley case are angry not simply because those people were killed, but because they died at the hands of people who are sworn to serve and protect the public, and work for the public. In the cases of Brown and Garner, they also believe that the people who did it were not held accountable by the justice system. They further believe that protesting will make a difference. Do you really expect criminal gangs to be responsive to public opinion in the way that our government (supposedly) is?
In this case, the killing was not carried out by someone we are asked to admire and obey, but by people who society agrees are thugs. And they were not only indicted, but will doubtless go to prison for their crime. Two people involved in the killing have already pled guilty."