Our intelligence has to first determine if ISIS is a legitimate threat against the US (tec's flying planes into buildings example). It appears, based on things the administration has said previously, that it does not. If it does not think that (and they know better than we do), then ground troops in Iraq seems rather stupid, and would cause world backlash and American deaths.
Continued aerial strikes seems like a reasonable option, as this keeps Americans safe (in the air, rather than on the ground), helps to protect Iraqis, and keeps ISIS from growing.
If we decide that ISIS actually is growing at a rate we didn't anticipate, and we think they are a threat to our way of life in the future, then I'm fine with ground troops, for the safety of the US.
Also, shame on Obama for not seeing this as a realistic possibility in Iraq. You pulled out of a new country with little understanding on how to run itself, in an area full of violence. Of course it was a possibility that another, stronger group could potentially take control of it. This is on him. That said, he was doing what the majority of the American people wanted. It's a main reason he was elected in the first place.
9/4/2014 2:14 PM (edited)