Defense overperformance Topic

I was looking at stats for a league of mine that's finishing up now, and noticed that my 1905 Mike Donlin is a Gold Glover at RF, despite his D/B- ratings.  

He has 20 "+" plays and no "-" plays, something I could never have imagined when I drafted him (his performance history shows an average of 0 "+" plays and 5 "-" plays in 3 previous uses).  

His fielding % was also better than expected -- .966 (only 9 errors) vs. his .934 real life %.

Am I missing something, or did I simply get lucky with Donlin?
5/26/2011 12:23 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
Didn't I read somewhere that part of the factor for + plays is the average range at that position in the league? So Donlin as a B- range guy could be way above average for a 2B ?
5/26/2011 1:12 PM
He's a RF, not a 2B.  But yeah, maybe it is somehow tied to the league average range at each position.  The top RF 'ers for "+" plays in this league are:

1985 Willie McGee (A range) 22
1905 Mike Donlin (B-) 21 (got one more in the PM game!)
1954 Mickey Mantle (B+) 13
1996 Albert Belle (C+) 12
1926 Freddy Leach (B) 11

My pitching staff was mostly modern guys, with fewer than 400 out of 1400 IP being deadball era, so I guess that helped Donlin too.  Contrast that with 1985 McGee, in 1st place above, who's on an all-deadball pitching team.


5/26/2011 1:33 PM
Something is quirky....I have an A/A CF with only 11 + plays through 131 games.
5/26/2011 1:49 PM
I think Crazy and I are right... I usually see a lot of + plays in RF if I have a guy with decent range there. Your A/A CF is probably average (or worse) compared to your league's CFers.
5/26/2011 1:53 PM
Results from a recent league...

Player SN Pos G GS Inn PO A E DP + - Fld% RF
McPhee, Bid 1887 2B 162 162 1,447.3 357 597 23 87 41 1 .976 5.93
Anson, Cap 1885 1B 162 162 1,392.3 1698 120 10 109 40 0 .995 11.75
Glasscock, Jack 1887 SS 162 162 1,447.3 354 542 34 99 34 0 .963 5.57
Stovey, Harry 1886 CF 162 162 1,392.3 385 3 9 0 28 0 .977 2.51
Lyons, Denny 1889 3B 162 162 1,396.3 130 290 33 15 26 0 .927 2.71
Carroll, Fred 1886 RF 162 162 1,447.3 324 8 6 1 26 0 .982 2.06
Hanlon, Ned 1890 LF 162 162 1,447.3 278 7 8 0 16 0 .973 1.77

Including pitchers and other players, the team had 235 "+" plays and 2 "-" plays.  Sadly, they finished win only 83 wins.
5/26/2011 2:08 PM (edited)
I just submitted this ticket:

"Could you explain the what goes into deciding if a + play occurs defensively?

I am sure it is complicated but I would love to see the logic."

Maybe we'll get an answer


5/26/2011 2:07 PM
Posted by Trentonjoe on 5/26/2011 1:49:00 PM (view original):
Something is quirky....I have an A/A CF with only 11 + plays through 131 games.
In CF an "average" range grade (zero net +plays) is about B+.  In RF or LF an "average" range grade is about C-.  An A in CF is only 2 grades above average while a B- RF is 3 grades above average.  So it wouldn't be terribly odd that a B- COF makes more + plays than an A CF. 
5/26/2011 2:55 PM
Assuming plus/minus plays are influenced by league average ranges, does it help us to know this?  Let's say I have three OF's with A+, D and D range.  Should I play the A+ guy where his range is likely to be way above average relative to the rest of the league (LF or RF)?  Okay, so he winds up with more plus plays -- but what about the D ranger guy I'm now playing in CF?  He's going to rack up a lot of minus plays, more than he would have in the corners, right?
5/26/2011 3:43 PM
Posted by crazystengel on 5/26/2011 3:43:00 PM (view original):
Assuming plus/minus plays are influenced by league average ranges, does it help us to know this?  Let's say I have three OF's with A+, D and D range.  Should I play the A+ guy where his range is likely to be way above average relative to the rest of the league (LF or RF)?  Okay, so he winds up with more plus plays -- but what about the D ranger guy I'm now playing in CF?  He's going to rack up a lot of minus plays, more than he would have in the corners, right?
Right. I don't really know how strong the impact is. If you got everyone to agree to play D range guys in CF, would they all play it capably? Or is there a limit? I have to think it's a mix between pure range and relative range. Mike Cameron would still have to get 20+ plays even surrounded by other A+ guys (I would think)
5/26/2011 3:46 PM
crazy, I've had similar stats w/ 3b Bobby Bonilla in the Centenary Progressive.

1988  C-/A+  162gs 20E 30+ plays 0- plays. He was a GG for most of the year but did not win it at the end. He had @5-6 E's in our last 20g's. 690RL pa's.
1989  D+/A+  84gs  18E  15+ plays 0- plays. Current GG. Played him in LF D-/B- for 2g 2E 2+ plays. 698RL pa's.

I attributed his A+ range to the high number of +plays, but if in fact, there is some sort of "curve" for + plays, that does add a new wrinkle to players w/ secondary defensive positions...
5/26/2011 5:06 PM
This post has a rating of , which is below the default threshold.
B- range is really good compared to other doods from 1905.
5/27/2011 12:59 AM
Posted by zubinsum on 5/26/2011 9:09:00 PM (view original):
Posted by jfranco77 on 5/26/2011 3:46:00 PM (view original):
Posted by crazystengel on 5/26/2011 3:43:00 PM (view original):
Assuming plus/minus plays are influenced by league average ranges, does it help us to know this?  Let's say I have three OF's with A+, D and D range.  Should I play the A+ guy where his range is likely to be way above average relative to the rest of the league (LF or RF)?  Okay, so he winds up with more plus plays -- but what about the D ranger guy I'm now playing in CF?  He's going to rack up a lot of minus plays, more than he would have in the corners, right?
Right. I don't really know how strong the impact is. If you got everyone to agree to play D range guys in CF, would they all play it capably? Or is there a limit? I have to think it's a mix between pure range and relative range. Mike Cameron would still have to get 20+ plays even surrounded by other A+ guys (I would think)
Plus/ minus plays are not influenced by league average ranges.  What I was trying to communicate is that in the sim, neutral range (the point where plus and minus plays balance on average) is higher in CF (~B+) than it is in RF or LF (~C-).  This is about the same as in real-life where a league average CF (say Colby Rasmus) would easily play the best COF in the majors.  While a very good LF (say Matt Holliday) would play one of the worst CFs in the majors.
So I guess we can conclude that the 3 other times 1905 Donlin was used -- where he averaged 0 "+" plays and 5 "-" plays (in contrast to the 22 "+" and 0 "-" plays he had for me) -- that he was used in CF?
5/28/2011 2:08 AM
12 Next ▸
Defense overperformance Topic

Search Criteria

Terms of Use Customer Support Privacy Statement

© 1999-2024 WhatIfSports.com, Inc. All rights reserved. WhatIfSports is a trademark of WhatIfSports.com, Inc. SimLeague, SimMatchup and iSimNow are trademarks or registered trademarks of Electronic Arts, Inc. Used under license. The names of actual companies and products mentioned herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.