Posted by rbow923 on 10/11/2010 10:23:00 PM (view original):
I think those are two separate events. Sparky chooses to pinch hit for Milacki before deciding wether to bunt. Sparky's not smart enough to think of everything at once. even if he did what you wanted there would be other people complaining that's not what they want! and surely the hitter is a better bunter than milacki.
you could set milacki to "dont pinch hit for" and set the hitters bunt setting to zero but that might not be what you want in other situatiuons.
Well, I sent in a support ticket.
I was wondering about the logic about bringing in Scotty Barr to pinch hit for Bob Milacki if all he was going to do is bunt. It seems like it would have been more logical to keep Milacki in to bunt since he only had 87 out of 105 of his TPC. I was wondering if you could clear it up for me.
Thanks
profcake |
| 10/14/2010 2:02 PM |
Customer Support |
Michael,
That is definitely a questionable decision. We will be reviewing the logic in the coming weeks and will make an adjustment.
Thanks |
So at least they might look into it at some point. But back to another point, as for Barr being a better bunter I agree. But is there even an event in WiS for a failed sacrifice bunt attempt? And if there is not( I have never seen one), it seems like Milacki would have to be the only choice.