Anybody who's ever taken a logic/reasoning course knows that slippery slope arguments are almost never valid.  This whole thread is full of people going full retard.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Gay marriage didn't open the door for polygamy any more than interracial marriage did, or any more than heterosexual marriage did. Polygamy is completely unrelated to gay marriage.

Posted by dahsdebater on 7/7/2015 9:31:00 PM (view original):
Anybody who's ever taken a logic/reasoning course knows that slippery slope arguments are almost never valid.  This whole thread is full of people going full retard.

Well, now that you're here, yeah.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 9:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Gay marriage didn't open the door for polygamy any more than interracial marriage did, or any more than heterosexual marriage did. Polygamy is completely unrelated to gay marriage.

Traditional definition of marriage = one man and one woman.

Polygamy deviates from that definition just as gay marriage does, while interracial and heterosexual marriage stay within the traditional definition.

Color you wrong once again.  Shocking.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 9:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Gay marriage didn't open the door for polygamy any more than interracial marriage did, or any more than heterosexual marriage did. Polygamy is completely unrelated to gay marriage.

Traditional definition of marriage = one man and one woman.

Polygamy deviates from that definition just as gay marriage does, while interracial and heterosexual marriage stay within the traditional definition.

Color you wrong once again.  Shocking.

You could just as easily argue that the traditional definition of marriage = two people and that making it three deviates more.

But it really doesn't matter. Gay marriage is legal because there is no reason to prohibit it. If you want to argue that polygamy also lacks a reason for prohibition, fine, but it's a separate issue.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 10:17:00 PM (view original):

Posted by dahsdebater on 7/7/2015 9:31:00 PM (view original):
Anybody who's ever taken a logic/reasoning course knows that slippery slope arguments are almost never valid.  This whole thread is full of people going full retard.

Well, now that you're here, yeah.

It went full retard long before Dahs mentioned it. Pure RSF up in this piece.

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 10:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 9:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Gay marriage didn't open the door for polygamy any more than interracial marriage did, or any more than heterosexual marriage did. Polygamy is completely unrelated to gay marriage.

Traditional definition of marriage = one man and one woman.

Polygamy deviates from that definition just as gay marriage does, while interracial and heterosexual marriage stay within the traditional definition.

Color you wrong once again.  Shocking.

You could just as easily argue that the traditional definition of marriage = two people and that making it three deviates more.

But it really doesn't matter. Gay marriage is legal because there is no reason to prohibit it. If you want to argue that polygamy also lacks a reason for prohibition, fine, but it's a separate issue.

No, you can't "just as easily argue" that the traditional definition of marriage is just two people.  If that were the case, we wouldn't be having this controversy about gay marriage.

That's a moronic and incredibly insincere argument, even for you, the King of Stupid.

Dumbass.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Incestual gay marriage.    No chance of birth defects.   And it will make people HAPPY!!!!






And, really, isn't that's all that's important?

Posted by tecwrg on 7/8/2015 7:04:00 AM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 10:24:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 10:20:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 9:50:00 PM (view original):

Posted by tecwrg on 7/7/2015 8:32:00 PM (view original):

Posted by bad_luck on 7/7/2015 6:40:00 PM (view original):
Actually, **** it. Polygamy is harmless and should also be allowed.

Happy?

Sure.  Marriage makes people happy.  More happiness for everybody.

So now that gay marriage is the law of the land, that opens the door for polygamy.

What will come after polygamy?

Gay marriage didn't open the door for polygamy any more than interracial marriage did, or any more than heterosexual marriage did. Polygamy is completely unrelated to gay marriage.

Traditional definition of marriage = one man and one woman.

Polygamy deviates from that definition just as gay marriage does, while interracial and heterosexual marriage stay within the traditional definition.

Color you wrong once again.  Shocking.

You could just as easily argue that the traditional definition of marriage = two people and that making it three deviates more.

But it really doesn't matter. Gay marriage is legal because there is no reason to prohibit it. If you want to argue that polygamy also lacks a reason for prohibition, fine, but it's a separate issue.

No, you can't "just as easily argue" that the traditional definition of marriage is just two people.  If that were the case, we wouldn't be having this controversy about gay marriage.

That's a moronic and incredibly insincere argument, even for you, the King of Stupid.

Dumbass.

Well, actually you can. Traditionally, marriage has always been two people. Adding a third changes the dynamic of marriage much more than allowing the two people to be the same gender.

But, it's really irrelevant. Gay marriage is legal because there isn't a reason to prohibit it. Polygamy is not legal and is a separate issue.

Another incorrect assertion.

Polygamy is very common in most of Africa and the Middle East.  Gay marriage has been pretty much uncommon throughout the entire world in most cultures.

Gay marriage "changes the dynamic of marriage" much more than polygamy does in many cultures.

Posted by tecwrg on 7/8/2015 10:41:00 AM (view original):
Another incorrect assertion.

Polygamy is very common in most of Africa and the Middle East.  Gay marriage has been pretty much uncommon throughout the entire world in most cultures.

Gay marriage "changes the dynamic of marriage" much more than polygamy does in many cultures.

So you're saying there is no real definition of traditional marriage? Interesting.

Also irrelevant.

Gay marriage is legal because there is no reason to prohibit it. You know this and agree.

Polygamy is not legal and is separate from the gay marriage issue.

Do you wake up every morning with a goal to be dumber today than you were yesterday?

It seems that way.

Wow, you really got me there.

Shame on me for getting into a battle of wits with an unarmed person.